Bone Graft and Intraosseous Anchorage of Dental Implants for Reconstruction of the Residual Alveolar Ridge

被引:4
|
作者
Bali, Yashika [1 ]
Singh, Ravpreet [1 ]
Gill, Tarunpreet Kaur
Rela, Rathi [2 ]
Vatsa, Ritesh [3 ]
Priyadarshni, Priyanka [4 ]
机构
[1] BJS Dent Coll & Hosp, Dept Prosthodont, Ludhiana, Punjab, India
[2] Nalanda Med Coll & Hosp, Dept Oral Med & Radiol, Patna, Bihar, India
[3] Sri Krishna Med Coll & Hosp, Dept Dent, Muzaffarpur, Bihar, India
[4] Patna Dent Coll & Hosp, Dept Prosthodont, Patna, Bihar, India
来源
关键词
Bone regeneration; collagen; dental implants; guided bone regeneration; membranes; osseointegration; BARRIER MEMBRANES; AUGMENTATION; DEFECTS;
D O I
10.4103/jpbs.JPBS_638_20
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Background: Bone grafting aims at better dental implant osseointegration and preserves the remaining alveolar bone in the socket. The success of various bone grafting materials plays a vital role in assessing future implant function. Aims and Objectives: The present clinical trial was aimed at evaluating the results of guided bone regeneration (GBR) with and without the bioresorbable membrane in the dental implant placement. Materials and Methods: The 20 patients were divided into two groups (n = 10). First was Group I- GBR with bioresorbable collagen membrane (BioGide (TM)) and second was Group II- GBR without membrane. Bone gain and bone levels were analyzed for both groups. All the collected data were analyzed statistically. Results: For Group I, bone levels at baseline were nonsignificant (P = 0.2188) Similarly, nonsignificant values were seen in both groups at 3 months with bone level values of 0.25 +/- 0.17 and 0.38 +/- 0.24 for Group I and Group II, respectively. Changes in the bone levels were found to be 2.45 +/- 0.349 and 2.58 +/- 0.304 from Group I and II, respectively, inferring the nonsignificant difference with P value of 0.3723. The percentage of bone gain for intergroup at the end of 3 months was 89.15% +/- 0.678 for Group I and 88.68% +/- 0.503%; these values were statistically nonsignificant (P = 0.982). Conclusion: Nonsignificant difference was observed between the two groups with and without membrane in terms of changes in bone level, percentage of bone gain, and bone defect reduction. This study concludes that the use of bone grafts significantly improves residual alveolar ridge irrespective of membrane used.
引用
收藏
页码:465 / 468
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Calvarial Autogenous Bone Graft for Maxillary Ridge and Sinus Reconstruction for Rehabilitation With Dental Implants
    Bastos, Alliny Souza
    Spin-Neto, Rubens
    Conte-Neto, Nicolau
    Galina, Keidy
    Boeck-Neto, Rodolfo Jorge
    Marcantonio, Claudio
    Marcantonio, Elcio
    Marcantonio, Elcio, Jr.
    JOURNAL OF ORAL IMPLANTOLOGY, 2014, 40 (04) : 469 - 478
  • [2] Reconstruction of severely resorbed alveolar ridge crests with dental implants using a bovine bone mineral for augmentation
    Hising, P
    Bolin, A
    Branting, C
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2001, 16 (01) : 90 - 97
  • [3] DIRECT BONE ANCHORAGE OF DENTAL IMPLANTS
    ALBREKTSSON, T
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1983, 50 (02): : 255 - 261
  • [4] Placement of endosteal implants combined with chin bone onlay graft for dental reconstruction in patients with grafted alveolar clefts
    Fukuda, M
    Takahashi, T
    Yamaguchi, T
    Kochi, S
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1998, 27 (06) : 440 - 444
  • [5] Alveolar Ridge Preservation With Deproteinized Bovine Bone Graft and Collagen Membrane and Delayed Implants
    Pang, Chaoyuan
    Ding, Yuxiang
    Zhou, Hongzhi
    Qin, Ruifeng
    Hou, Rui
    Zhang, Guoliang
    Hu, Kaijin
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2014, 25 (05) : 1698 - 1702
  • [6] Use of Allogeneic Bone Graft in Maxillary Reconstruction for Installation of Dental implants
    Gomes, Kelston Ulbricht
    Carlini, Joao Luiz
    Biron, Cassia
    Rapoport, Abrao
    Dedivitis, Rogerio A.
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2008, 66 (11) : 2335 - 2338
  • [7] Cone Beam Computed Tomographic Evaluation of a Maxillary Alveolar Ridge Reconstruction With Iliac Crest Graft and Implants
    Gonzalez Cortes, Arthur Rodriguez
    Cortes, Djalma Nogueira
    Arita, Emiko Saito
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2012, 23 (01) : E12 - E14
  • [8] Torus Palatinus: A Graft Option for Alveolar Ridge Reconstruction
    Moraes Junior, Edgard Franco
    Damante, Carla Andreotti
    Araujo, Sergio Ricardo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PERIODONTICS & RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 2010, 30 (03) : 283 - 289
  • [9] Two-stage reconstruction of the severely deficient alveolar ridge: bone graft followed by alveolar distraction osteogenesis
    Rachmiel, A.
    Emodi, O.
    Aizenbud, D.
    Rachmiel, D.
    Shilo, D.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2018, 47 (01) : 117 - 124
  • [10] Reconstruction of Severely Atrophied Alveolar Ridges with Calvarial Onlay Bone Grafts and Dental Implants
    Mertens, Christian
    Steveling, Helmut G.
    Seeberger, Robin
    Hoffmann, Juergen
    Freier, Kolja
    CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2013, 15 (05) : 673 - 683