Strategies to Improve the Clinical Outcomes for Direct-to-Consumer Pharmacogenomic Tests

被引:9
|
作者
Tafazoli, Alireza [1 ,2 ]
Guggilla, Rama Krishna [3 ,4 ]
Kamel-Koleti, Zahra [5 ]
Miltyk, Wojciech [1 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ Bialystok, Div Lab Med, Fac Pharm, Dept Anal & Bioanal Med, PL-15089 Bialystok, Poland
[2] Med Univ Bialystok, Clin Res Ctr, PL-15276 Bialystok, Poland
[3] Med Univ Bialystok, Dept Populat Med & Civilizat Dis Prevent, Fac Med, Div Dent, PL-15269 Bialystok, Poland
[4] Med Univ Bialystok, Div Med Educ English, PL-15269 Bialystok, Poland
[5] Mazandaran Univ Med Sci, Shohada Hosp, Dept Pathol & Med Lab, Behshahr 4851613185, Iran
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
direct-to-consumer pharmacogenomic tests; clinical related outcome; personalized medicine; LANDSCAPE; IMPACT; ISSUES; LEGAL;
D O I
10.3390/genes12030361
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Direct-to-consumer genetic tests (DTC-GT) have become a bridge between marketing and traditional healthcare services. After earning FDA endorsement for such facilities, several fast-developing companies started to compete in the related area. Pharmacogenomic (PGx) tests have been introduced as potentially one of the main medical services of such companies. Most of the individuals will be interested in finding out about the phenotypic consequences of their genetic variants and molecular risk factors against diverse medicines they take or will take later. Direct-to-consumer pharmacogenomic tests (DTC-PT) is still in its young age, however it is expected to expand rapidly through the industry in the future. The result of PGx tests could be considered as the main road toward the implementation of personalized and precision medicine in the clinic. This narrative critical review study provides a descriptive overview on DTC-GT, then focuses on DTC-PT, and also introduces and suggests the potential approaches for improving the clinical related outcomes of such tests on healthcare systems.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 14
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Opportunities and challenges with direct-to-consumer genetic tests in personalised care
    Kiselev, Y.
    Landmark, C. Johannessen
    Baftiu, A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY, 2019, 41 (01) : 325 - 325
  • [42] Clarity Also Needed for Direct-to-Consumer Pharmacogenetic Tests Reply
    Kilbride, Madison K.
    Domchek, Susan M.
    Bradbury, Angela R.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 38 (03) : 284 - +
  • [43] Direct-to-consumer personal genomic tests need better regulation
    Osman Moneer
    Jennifer E. Miller
    Nilay D. Shah
    Joseph S. Ross
    Nature Medicine, 2021, 27 : 940 - 943
  • [44] Policies of US Companies Offering Direct-to-Consumer Laboratory Tests
    Kalokairinou, Louiza
    Choi, Rebekah
    Wei, Nina
    Wexler, Anna
    JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2023, 183 (11) : 1275 - 1278
  • [45] Online Genomes: Problematizing the disruptiveness of direct-to-consumer genetic tests
    Turrini, Mauro
    SOCIOLOGY COMPASS, 2018, 12 (11):
  • [46] Direct-to-consumer marketing of genetic tests for cancer: Buyer beware
    Gray, S
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2003, 21 (17) : 3191 - 3193
  • [47] Direct-to-consumer personal genomic tests need better regulation
    Moneer, Osman
    Miller, Jennifer E.
    Shah, Nilay D.
    Ross, Joseph S.
    NATURE MEDICINE, 2021, 27 (06) : 940 - 943
  • [48] Call to improve transparent communication in direct-to-consumer test marketing
    Gram, Emma Grundtvig
    Macdonald, Helen
    Kramer, Barnett
    Woloshin, Steven
    BMJ EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE, 2024, 29 (04) : 213 - 214
  • [49] Effects of Direct-to-Consumer Advertising and Clinical Guidelines on Appropriate Use of Human Papillomavirus DNA Tests
    Price, Rebecca Anhang
    Frank, Richard G.
    Cleary, Paul D.
    Goldie, Sue J.
    MEDICAL CARE, 2011, 49 (02) : 132 - 138
  • [50] Ethical and clinical practice considerations for genetic counselors related to direct-to-consumer marketing of genetic tests
    Wade, Christopher H.
    Wilfond, Benjamin S.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS PART C-SEMINARS IN MEDICAL GENETICS, 2006, 142C (04) : 284 - 292