Strategies to Improve the Clinical Outcomes for Direct-to-Consumer Pharmacogenomic Tests

被引:9
|
作者
Tafazoli, Alireza [1 ,2 ]
Guggilla, Rama Krishna [3 ,4 ]
Kamel-Koleti, Zahra [5 ]
Miltyk, Wojciech [1 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ Bialystok, Div Lab Med, Fac Pharm, Dept Anal & Bioanal Med, PL-15089 Bialystok, Poland
[2] Med Univ Bialystok, Clin Res Ctr, PL-15276 Bialystok, Poland
[3] Med Univ Bialystok, Dept Populat Med & Civilizat Dis Prevent, Fac Med, Div Dent, PL-15269 Bialystok, Poland
[4] Med Univ Bialystok, Div Med Educ English, PL-15269 Bialystok, Poland
[5] Mazandaran Univ Med Sci, Shohada Hosp, Dept Pathol & Med Lab, Behshahr 4851613185, Iran
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
direct-to-consumer pharmacogenomic tests; clinical related outcome; personalized medicine; LANDSCAPE; IMPACT; ISSUES; LEGAL;
D O I
10.3390/genes12030361
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Direct-to-consumer genetic tests (DTC-GT) have become a bridge between marketing and traditional healthcare services. After earning FDA endorsement for such facilities, several fast-developing companies started to compete in the related area. Pharmacogenomic (PGx) tests have been introduced as potentially one of the main medical services of such companies. Most of the individuals will be interested in finding out about the phenotypic consequences of their genetic variants and molecular risk factors against diverse medicines they take or will take later. Direct-to-consumer pharmacogenomic tests (DTC-PT) is still in its young age, however it is expected to expand rapidly through the industry in the future. The result of PGx tests could be considered as the main road toward the implementation of personalized and precision medicine in the clinic. This narrative critical review study provides a descriptive overview on DTC-GT, then focuses on DTC-PT, and also introduces and suggests the potential approaches for improving the clinical related outcomes of such tests on healthcare systems.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 14
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Selling direct-to-consumer epigenetic tests: are we ready?
    Dupras, Charles
    Beauchamp, Elisabeth
    Joly, Yann
    NATURE REVIEWS GENETICS, 2020, 21 (06) : 335 - 336
  • [32] Direct-to-consumer genetic tests: beyond medical regulation?
    David Magnus
    Mildred K Cho
    Robert Cook-Deegan
    Genome Medicine, 1
  • [33] Are doctors prepared for direct-to-consumer advertising of genetic tests?
    Mennuti, Michael
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2008, 111 (04): : 991 - 991
  • [34] Direct-to-Consumer Cardiac Screening Tests: User Beware
    Lockwood, Christina M.
    CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 2012, 58 (06) : 1068 - 1069
  • [35] Selling direct-to-consumer epigenetic tests: are we ready?
    Charles Dupras
    Elisabeth Beauchamp
    Yann Joly
    Nature Reviews Genetics, 2020, 21 : 335 - 336
  • [36] Ethical Implications of Direct-to-Consumer Hereditary Cancer Tests
    Kilbride, Madison K.
    Domchek, Susan M.
    Bradbury, Angela R.
    JAMA ONCOLOGY, 2018, 4 (10) : 1327 - 1328
  • [37] Clarity Also Needed for Direct-to-Consumer Pharmacogenetic Tests
    Patel, Jai N.
    McLeod, Howard L.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 38 (03) : 283 - +
  • [38] Direct-to-consumer genetic testing - clinical considerations
    Trent, Ronald J.
    MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2013, 198 (09) : 496 - 498
  • [39] Ready or not, here it comes: Direct-to-consumer pharmacogenomic testing and its implications for community pharmacists
    Gammal, Roseann S.
    Mayes, Jason
    Caudle, Kelly E.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PHARMACISTS ASSOCIATION, 2019, 59 (05) : 646 - 650
  • [40] Perception of Direct-To-Consumer Genetic Testing and Direct-To-Consumer Advertising of Genetic Tests among Members of a Large Managed Care Organization
    Rahm, Alanna Kulchak
    Feigelson, Heather Spencer
    Wagner, Nicole
    Anh Quynh Le
    Halterman, Eve
    Cornish, Nadine
    Dearing, James W.
    JOURNAL OF GENETIC COUNSELING, 2012, 21 (03) : 448 - 461