Strategies to Improve the Clinical Outcomes for Direct-to-Consumer Pharmacogenomic Tests

被引:9
|
作者
Tafazoli, Alireza [1 ,2 ]
Guggilla, Rama Krishna [3 ,4 ]
Kamel-Koleti, Zahra [5 ]
Miltyk, Wojciech [1 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ Bialystok, Div Lab Med, Fac Pharm, Dept Anal & Bioanal Med, PL-15089 Bialystok, Poland
[2] Med Univ Bialystok, Clin Res Ctr, PL-15276 Bialystok, Poland
[3] Med Univ Bialystok, Dept Populat Med & Civilizat Dis Prevent, Fac Med, Div Dent, PL-15269 Bialystok, Poland
[4] Med Univ Bialystok, Div Med Educ English, PL-15269 Bialystok, Poland
[5] Mazandaran Univ Med Sci, Shohada Hosp, Dept Pathol & Med Lab, Behshahr 4851613185, Iran
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
direct-to-consumer pharmacogenomic tests; clinical related outcome; personalized medicine; LANDSCAPE; IMPACT; ISSUES; LEGAL;
D O I
10.3390/genes12030361
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Direct-to-consumer genetic tests (DTC-GT) have become a bridge between marketing and traditional healthcare services. After earning FDA endorsement for such facilities, several fast-developing companies started to compete in the related area. Pharmacogenomic (PGx) tests have been introduced as potentially one of the main medical services of such companies. Most of the individuals will be interested in finding out about the phenotypic consequences of their genetic variants and molecular risk factors against diverse medicines they take or will take later. Direct-to-consumer pharmacogenomic tests (DTC-PT) is still in its young age, however it is expected to expand rapidly through the industry in the future. The result of PGx tests could be considered as the main road toward the implementation of personalized and precision medicine in the clinic. This narrative critical review study provides a descriptive overview on DTC-GT, then focuses on DTC-PT, and also introduces and suggests the potential approaches for improving the clinical related outcomes of such tests on healthcare systems.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 14
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Europe to ban direct-to-consumer genetic tests?
    Borry, Pascal
    NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2008, 26 (07) : 736 - 737
  • [22] Response to 'Europe and direct-to-consumer genetic tests'
    Larry J. Kricka
    Paolo Fortina
    Yuan Mai
    George P. Patrinos
    Nature Reviews Genetics, 2012, 13 : 146 - 146
  • [23] Direct-to-consumer genetic tests: flawed and unethical
    不详
    LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2008, 9 (12): : 1113 - 1113
  • [24] Direct-to-Consumer Marketing of Genetic and Genomic Tests
    不详
    ONCOLOGY NURSING FORUM, 2010, 37 (04) : 385 - 385
  • [25] The epistemic harms of direct-to-consumer genetic tests
    Yasmin Haddad
    Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 2023, 26 : 559 - 571
  • [26] Direct-to-Consumer Marketing of Genetic Tests: Access Does Not Reflect Clinical Utility
    Field, Amanda
    Krokosky, Alyson
    Terry, Sharon F.
    GENETIC TESTING AND MOLECULAR BIOMARKERS, 2010, 14 (06) : 731 - 732
  • [27] Direct-to-consumer genetic tests: beyond medical regulation?
    Magnus, David
    Cho, Mildred K.
    Cook-Deegan, Robert
    GENOME MEDICINE, 2009, 1
  • [28] Are doctors prepared for direct-to-consumer advertising of genetics tests?
    Tracy, Erin E.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2007, 110 (06): : 1389 - 1391
  • [29] Direct-to-consumer genetic tests: a risk to public health?
    Katsanis, S. H.
    Javitt, G.
    Hudson, K.
    PERSONALIZED MEDICINE, 2008, 5 (04) : 322 - 322
  • [30] Legislation to Increase Accessibility to Direct-to-Consumer Tests in California
    Doan, Thuan-Huong Pearl
    Adamson, Paul C.
    Klausner, Jeffrey D.
    SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASES, 2022, 49 (01) : E37 - E37