Multicentre evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging supported transperineal prostate biopsy in biopsy-naive men with suspicion of prostate cancer

被引:114
|
作者
Hansen, Nienke L. [1 ,13 ]
Barrett, Tristan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Kesch, Claudia [4 ]
Pepdjonovic, Lana [5 ,6 ]
Bonekamp, David [7 ]
O'Sullivan, Richard [8 ,9 ]
Distler, Florian [4 ]
Warren, Anne [1 ,3 ,10 ]
Samel, Christina [11 ]
Hadaschik, Boris [4 ,14 ]
Grummet, Jeremy [5 ,6 ]
Kastner, Christof [1 ,3 ,12 ]
机构
[1] Addenbrookes Hosp, CamPARI Clin, Cambridge, England
[2] Addenbrookes Hosp, Dept Radiol, Cambridge, England
[3] Univ Cambridge, Cambridge, England
[4] Univ Hosp Heidelberg, Dept Urol, Heidelberg, Germany
[5] Australian Urol Associates, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[6] Monash Univ, Dept Surg, Cent Clin Sch, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[7] German Canc Res Ctr, Dept Radiol, Heidelberg, Germany
[8] Healthcare Imaging, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[9] Monash Univ, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[10] Addenbrookes Hosp, Dept Pathol, Cambridge, England
[11] Univ Hosp Cologne, Inst Med Stat Informat & Epidemiol, Cologne, Germany
[12] Addenbrookes Hosp, Dept Urol, Cambridge, England
[13] Univ Hosp Cologne, Dept Diagnost & Intervent Radiol, Cologne, Germany
[14] Univ Hosp Essen, Dept Urol, Essen, Germany
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
transperineal; magnetic resonance imaging; MRI-TRUS fusion; cognitive fusion; prostate biopsy; #PCSM; #ProstateCancer; ULTRASOUND-GUIDED BIOPSY; TARGETED BIOPSY; REPEAT BIOPSY; FUSION; MRI; GUIDELINES; DIAGNOSIS; RISK; HISTOPATHOLOGY; LESIONS;
D O I
10.1111/bju.14049
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
ObjectivesTo analyse the detection rates of primary magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-fusion transperineal prostate biopsy using combined targeted and systematic core distribution in three tertiary referral centres. Patients and MethodsIn this multicentre, prospective outcome study, 807 consecutive biopsy-naive patients underwent MRI-guided transperineal prostate biopsy, as the first diagnostic intervention, between 10/2012 and 05/2016. MRI was reported following the Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) criteria. In all, 236 patients had 18-24 systematic transperineal biopsies only, and 571 patients underwent additional targeted biopsies either by MRI-fusion or cognitive targeting if PI-RADS 3 lesions were present. Detection rates for any and Gleason score 7-10 cancer in targeted and overall biopsy were calculated and predictive values were calculated for different PI-RADS and PSA density (PSAD) groups. ResultsCancer was detected in 68% of the patients (546/807) and Gleason score 7-10 cancer in 49% (392/807). The negative predictive value of 236 PI-RADS 1-2 MRI in combination with PSAD of <0.1ng/mL/mL for Gleason score 7-10 was 0.91 (95% confidence interval 0.07, 8% of study population). In 418 patients with PI-RADS 4-5 lesions using targeted plus systematic biopsies, the cancer detection rate of Gleason score 7-10 was significantly higher at 71% vs 59% and 61% with either approach alone (P < 0.001). For 153 PI-RADS 3 lesions, the detection rate was 31% with no significant difference to systematic biopsies with 27% (P > 0.05). Limitations include variability of multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) reading and Gleason grading. ConclusionMRI-based transperineal biopsy performed at high-volume tertiary care centres with a significant experience of prostate mpMRI and image-guided targeted biopsies yielded high detection rates of Gleason score 7-10 cancer. Prostate biopsies may not be needed for men with low PSAD and an unsuspicious MRI. In patients with high probability lesions, combined targeted and systematic biopsies are recommended.
引用
收藏
页码:40 / 49
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Magnetic resonance imaging-guided biopsies may improve diagnosis in biopsy-naive men with suspicion of prostate cancer
    Winther, Mads Dochedahl
    Balslev, Ingegerd
    Boesen, Lars
    Logager, Vibeke
    Noergaard, Nis
    Thestrup, Karen-Cecilie Duus
    Thomsen, Henrik S.
    DANISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2017, 64 (05):
  • [2] Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Prostate Biopsy Compared with Systematic Prostate Biopsy in Biopsy-naive Patients with Suspected Prostate Cancer
    Alkema, Nicolette G.
    Hoogeveen, Sebastiaan F. J. S.
    Cauberg, Evelyne C. C.
    Witte, Lambertus P. W.
    van't Veer-ten Kate, Miranda
    de Boer, Erwin
    Hoogland, Marije A. M.
    Blanker, Marco H.
    Boomsma, Martijn F.
    Steffens, Martijn G.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY OPEN SCIENCE, 2022, 44 : 125 - 130
  • [3] The Impact of Prostate Volume on Prostate Cancer Detection: Comparing Magnetic Resonance Imaging with Transrectal Ultrasound in Biopsy-naive Men
    Ye, Jianjun
    Zhang, Chichen
    Zheng, Lei
    Wang, Qihao
    Wu, Qiyou
    Tu, Xiang
    Bao, Yige
    Wei, Qiang
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY OPEN SCIENCE, 2024, 64 : 1 - 8
  • [4] Transrectal and transperineal MRI-guided prostate cancer pathways in biopsy-naive men
    Israel, B.
    Immerzeel, J. J. F. M.
    Van der Leest, M. M. G.
    Hannink, G. J.
    Zamecnik, P.
    Bomers, J. G. R.
    Schoots, I. G.
    Van Basten, J. P. A.
    Debruyne, F. M. J.
    Van Oort, I. M.
    Sedelaar, J. P. M.
    Barentsz, J. O.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2021, 79 : S1327 - S1328
  • [5] Should Prebiopsy Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging be Offered to All Biopsy-naive Men Undergoing Prostate Biopsy?
    Ahmad, Ardalan E.
    Finelli, Antonio
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2016, 69 (03) : 426 - 427
  • [6] Diagnostic Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Targeted Biopsy for Prostate Cancer in Biopsy-Naive Men: A Meta-Analysis
    Tu, Xiang
    Liu, Zhenhua
    Zhang, Chichen
    Chang, Tiancong
    Xu, He
    Bao, Yige
    Li, Jiakun
    Jin, Kun
    Yuan, Qiming
    Qiu, Shi
    Yang, Lu
    Wei, Qiang
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2020, 104 (3-4) : 187 - 198
  • [7] Magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasonography fusion targeted prostate biopsy finds more significant prostate cancer in biopsy-naive Japanese men compared with the standard biopsy
    Fujii, Shinsuke
    Hayashi, Tetsutaro
    Honda, Yukiko
    Terada, Hiroaki
    Akita, Ryuji
    Kitamura, Naoyuki
    Ueda, Eikoh
    Han, Xiangrui
    Ueno, Takeshi
    Miyamoto, Shunsuke
    Kitano, Hiroyuki
    Inoue, Shogo
    Teishima, Jun
    Abdi, Hamidreza
    Awai, Kazuo
    Takeshima, Yukio
    Sentani, Kazuhiro
    Yasui, Wataru
    Matsubara, Akio
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 27 (02) : 140 - 146
  • [8] Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Risk Calculators Optimize Selection for Prostate Biopsy Among Biopsy-Naive Men
    Fang, Andrew M.
    Rais-Bahrami, Soroush
    CANCER, 2022, 128 (01) : 25 - 27
  • [9] Targeted and Systematic Prostate Biopsy in Biopsy-naive Men With Positive Multiparameter Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings: A Meta-analysis
    Jiang, Guiya
    Zhang, Guangyuan
    Chen, Shuqiu
    Chen, Ming
    CLINICAL GENITOURINARY CANCER, 2020, 18 (02) : 105 - +
  • [10] TRUS Biopsy vs Transperineal Biopsy for Suspicion of Prostate Cancer
    Chiu, Peter K. F.
    Ahmed, Hashim U.
    Rastinehad, Ardeshir R.
    UROLOGY, 2022, 164 : 18 - 20