An online replanning method using warm start optimization and aperture morphing for flattening-filter-free beams

被引:13
|
作者
Ahunbay, Ergun E. [1 ]
Ates, O. [1 ]
Li, X. A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Med Coll Wisconsin, Dept Radiat Oncol, Milwaukee, WI 53226 USA
关键词
flattening-filter-free beams; adaptive radiotherapy; online replanning; MR-linac; INTERFRACTIONAL VARIATIONS; RADIOTHERAPY; PROSTATE; THERAPY; CANCER;
D O I
10.1118/1.4955439
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: In a situation where a couch shift for patient positioning is not preferred or prohibited (e. g., MR-linac), segment aperture morphing (SAM) can address target dislocation and deformation. For IMRT /VMAT with flattening-filter-free (FFF) beams, however, SAM method would lead to an adverse translational dose effect due to the beam unflattening. Here the authors propose a new two-step process to address both the translational effect of FFF beams and the target deformation. Methods: The replanning method consists of an offline and an online step. The offline step is to create a series of preshifted-plans (PSPs) obtained by a so-called "warm start" optimization (starting optimization from the original plan, rather than from scratch) at a series of isocenter shifts. The PSPs all have the same number of segments with very similar shapes, since the warm start optimization only adjusts the MLC positions instead of regenerating them. In the online step, a new plan is obtained by picking the closest PSP or linearly interpolating the MLC positions and the monitor units of the closest PSPs for the shift determined from the image of the day. This two-step process is completely automated and almost instantaneous (no optimization or dose calculation needed). The previously developed SAM algorithm is then applied for daily deformation. The authors tested the method on sample prostate and pancreas cases. Results: The two-step interpolation method can account for the adverse dose effects from FFF beams, while SAM corrects for the target deformation. Plan interpolation method is effective in diminishing the unflat beam effect and may allow reducing the required number of PSPs. The whole process takes the same time as the previously reported SAM process (5-10 min). Conclusions: The new two-step method plus SAM can address both the translation effects of FFF beams and target deformation, and can be executed in full automation except the delineation of target contour required by the SAM process. (C) 2016 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:4575 / 4584
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Scanned Percent Depth Dose Curve Discrepancy for Varian TrueBeam Flattening-Filter-Free Photon Beams Using Very Small Sensitive Volume Ion Chamber
    Zhao, H.
    Wang, B.
    Rassiah-Szegedi, P.
    Huang, Y.
    Sarkar, V.
    Szegedi, M.
    Salter, B. J.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2013, 40 (06)
  • [42] Comparison of Flattening Filter (FF) and Flattening-Filter-Free (FFF) 6 MV photon beam characteristics for small field dosimetry using EGSnrc Monte Carlo code
    Sangeetha, S.
    Sureka, C. S.
    RADIATION PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY, 2017, 135 : 63 - 75
  • [43] Local Control after stereotactic Radiotherapy for Metastases using Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy and Flattening-Filter-Free Technique
    Aydin, B.
    Er, I
    Aktuerk, N.
    Cetinayak, O.
    Umay, C.
    Alicikus, Arican Z.
    Demiral, Nur A.
    Akman, F.
    STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2017, 193 : S118 - S119
  • [44] Effectiveness of Flattening-Filter-Free versus Flattened Beams in V79 and Glioblastoma Patient-Derived Stem-like Cells
    Dini, Valentina
    Esposito, Giuseppe
    Sacconi, Andrea
    D'Andrea, Marco
    Tabocchini, Maria Antonella
    Anello, Pasquale
    Ricci-Vitiani, Lucia
    Buccarelli, Mariachiara
    Pallini, Roberto
    Strigari, Lidia
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR SCIENCES, 2023, 24 (02)
  • [45] Dosimetric Differences of Plans Using Flattened 6MV Versus Flattening-Filter-Free 10MV Beams for the Treatment of Prostate with and Without Seminal Vesicles
    Ashenafi, M.
    Rothfuss, C.
    Gray, A.
    Zhang, H.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 48 (06)
  • [46] Stereotactic body radiation therapy for prostate cancer: a dosimetric comparison of IMRT and VMAT using flattening filter and flattening filter-free beams
    El-Sayed, Sherif M.
    El-Gebaly, Reem H.
    Fathy, Mohamed M.
    Abdelaziz, Dina M.
    RADIATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL BIOPHYSICS, 2024, 63 (03) : 423 - 431
  • [47] Treatment Delivery with High-Intensity Flattening-Filter-Free Beams for Head-And-Neck Cancers: Performance Assessment of Automated IMRT versus VMAT
    Duan, J.
    Shen, S.
    Popple, R.
    Wu, X.
    Brezovich, I.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2011, 38 (06) : 3583 - +
  • [48] Ion recombination and polarity corrections for small-volume ionization chambers in high-dose-rate, flattening-filter-free pulsed photon beams
    Hyun, Megan A.
    Miller, Jessica R.
    Micka, John A.
    DeWerd, Larry A.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 44 (02) : 618 - 627
  • [49] Breast Tangential Treatment Plan Using Flattening Filter-free Beams: A Planning Study
    Xie, J.
    Cao, J.
    Chen, W.
    Cui, Y.
    Galvin, J.
    Yu, Y.
    Xiao, Y.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2012, 84 (03): : S867 - S867
  • [50] Improvement of the penumbra for small radiosurgical fields using flattening filter free low megavoltage beams
    Yarahmadi, Mehran
    Allahverdi, Mahmoud
    Nedaie, Hassan A.
    Asnaashari, Khadijeh
    Vaezzadeh, Sayed A.
    Sauer, Otto A.
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR MEDIZINISCHE PHYSIK, 2013, 23 (04): : 291 - 299