An online replanning method using warm start optimization and aperture morphing for flattening-filter-free beams

被引:13
|
作者
Ahunbay, Ergun E. [1 ]
Ates, O. [1 ]
Li, X. A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Med Coll Wisconsin, Dept Radiat Oncol, Milwaukee, WI 53226 USA
关键词
flattening-filter-free beams; adaptive radiotherapy; online replanning; MR-linac; INTERFRACTIONAL VARIATIONS; RADIOTHERAPY; PROSTATE; THERAPY; CANCER;
D O I
10.1118/1.4955439
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: In a situation where a couch shift for patient positioning is not preferred or prohibited (e. g., MR-linac), segment aperture morphing (SAM) can address target dislocation and deformation. For IMRT /VMAT with flattening-filter-free (FFF) beams, however, SAM method would lead to an adverse translational dose effect due to the beam unflattening. Here the authors propose a new two-step process to address both the translational effect of FFF beams and the target deformation. Methods: The replanning method consists of an offline and an online step. The offline step is to create a series of preshifted-plans (PSPs) obtained by a so-called "warm start" optimization (starting optimization from the original plan, rather than from scratch) at a series of isocenter shifts. The PSPs all have the same number of segments with very similar shapes, since the warm start optimization only adjusts the MLC positions instead of regenerating them. In the online step, a new plan is obtained by picking the closest PSP or linearly interpolating the MLC positions and the monitor units of the closest PSPs for the shift determined from the image of the day. This two-step process is completely automated and almost instantaneous (no optimization or dose calculation needed). The previously developed SAM algorithm is then applied for daily deformation. The authors tested the method on sample prostate and pancreas cases. Results: The two-step interpolation method can account for the adverse dose effects from FFF beams, while SAM corrects for the target deformation. Plan interpolation method is effective in diminishing the unflat beam effect and may allow reducing the required number of PSPs. The whole process takes the same time as the previously reported SAM process (5-10 min). Conclusions: The new two-step method plus SAM can address both the translation effects of FFF beams and target deformation, and can be executed in full automation except the delineation of target contour required by the SAM process. (C) 2016 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:4575 / 4584
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Technical Note: Correction for intra-chamber dose gradients in reference dosimetry of flattening-filter-free MV photon beams
    Ruggieri, Ruggero
    Naccarato, Stefania
    Stavrev, Pavel
    Stavreva, Nadejda
    Pasetto, Stefano
    Salamone, Ignazio
    Alongi, Filippo
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 43 (08) : 4729 - 4733
  • [32] Evaluating Mobius3D Dose Calculation Accuracy for Small-Field Flattening-Filter-Free Photon Beams
    Kim, Changhwan
    Kim, Jihun
    Lee, Young Kyu
    Shin, Han-Back
    Han, Min Cheol
    Kim, Hojin
    Kim, Jin Sung
    TECHNOLOGY IN CANCER RESEARCH & TREATMENT, 2022, 21
  • [33] Use and Choice of Ionization Chambers for the Commissioning of Flattened and Flattening-Filter-Free Photon Beams: Determination of Recombination Correction Factor (ks)
    Stucchi, C.
    Bresolin, A.
    Mongioj, V.
    Carrara, M.
    Pignoli, E.
    Bonfantini, F.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 41 (06) : 371 - 371
  • [34] Surface and build-up dose comparison between Elekta 6 MV flattening filter and flattening-filter-free beams using an advanced Markus ionization chamber and a solid water-equivalent phantom
    Imae, Toshikazu
    Takenaka, Shigeharu
    Watanabe, Yuichi
    Aoki, Atsushi
    Matsuda, Kanako
    Sasaki, Katsutake
    Saegusa, Shigeki
    Nawa, Kanabu
    Nakagawa, Keiichi
    Abe, Osamu
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 21 (12): : 334 - 339
  • [35] Treatment Planning Performance of High Intensity Flattening-Filter-Free Beams for Head-And-Neck Cancer: IMRT versus VMAT
    Duan, J.
    Shen, S.
    Popple, R.
    Wu, X.
    Brezovich, I.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2011, 38 (06)
  • [36] Comparison of Dosimetric Performance among Commercial Quality Assurance Systems for Verifying Pretreatment Plans of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Using Flattening-Filter-Free Beams
    Chung, Jin-Beom
    Kang, Sang-Won
    Eom, Keun-Yong
    Song, Changhoon
    Choi, Kyoung-Sik
    Suh, Tae Suk
    JOURNAL OF KOREAN MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2016, 31 (11) : 1742 - 1748
  • [37] Rotational IMRT Delivery Using a Siemens Artiste in Flattening-Filter-Free, High Dose-Rate Mode
    Sarkar, V.
    Rassiah-Szegedi, P.
    Szegedi, M.
    Wang, B.
    Zhao, H.
    Huang, Y.
    Shukla, H.
    Salter, B.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2010, 37 (06)
  • [38] In-vivo and in-vitro impact of high-dose rate radiotherapy using flattening-filter-free beams on the anti-tumor immune response
    Laurent, P. A.
    Kownacka, A.
    Boidot, R.
    Richard, C.
    Limagne, E.
    Morgand, V.
    Froidurot, L.
    Bonin, C.
    Aubignac, L.
    Ghiringhelli, F.
    Crehange, G.
    Mirjolet, C.
    CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2020, 24 : 116 - 122
  • [39] Visualisation of Respiratory Tumour Motion and Co-Moving Isodose Lines in the Context of Respiratory Gating, IMRT and Flattening-Filter-Free Beams
    Dzierma, Yvonne
    Nuesken, Frank G.
    Fleckenstein, Jochen
    Kremp, Stephanie
    Licht, Norbert P.
    Ruebe, Christian
    PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (01):
  • [40] 3D In-Vivo Portal Dosimetry Hypo-Fractionated Radiotherapy with Flattening-Filter-Free Beams: First Results
    Taborda, A.
    Stroom, J.
    Nijsten, S.
    Greco, C.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 45 (06) : E181 - E181