A framework for understanding artificial intelligence research: insights from practice

被引:36
|
作者
Bawack, Ransome Epie [1 ]
Fosso Wamba, Samuel [2 ]
Carillo, Kevin Daniel Andre [2 ]
机构
[1] Toulouse Capitole Univ, TBS Business Sch, Res Ctr, Toulouse, France
[2] TBS Business Sch, Toulouse, France
关键词
Artificial intelligence; Industry context; Literature review; Fortune; 500; Information systems research; MACHINE LEARNING APPROACH; DECISION-SUPPORT-SYSTEM; DEEP NEURAL-NETWORKS; TEXT ANALYTICS; BIG DATA; INFORMATION-TECHNOLOGY; RECOMMENDER SYSTEMS; USER ACCEPTANCE; PREDICTION; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1108/JEIM-07-2020-0284
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Purpose The current evolution of artificial intelligence (AI) practices and applications is creating a disconnection between modern-day information system (IS) research and practices. The purpose of this study is to propose a classification framework that connects the IS discipline to contemporary AI practices. Design/methodology/approach We conducted a review of practitioner literature to derive our framework's key dimensions. We reviewed 103 documents on AI published by 25 leading technology companies ranked in the 2019 list of Fortune 500 companies. After that, we reviewed and classified 110 information system (IS) publications on AI using our proposed framework to demonstrate its ability to classify IS research on AI and reveal relevant research gaps. Findings Practitioners have adopted different definitional perspectives of AI (field of study, concept, ability, system), explaining the differences in the development, implementation and expectations from AI experienced today. All these perspectives suggest that perception, comprehension, action and learning are the four capabilities AI artifacts must possess. However, leading IS journals have mostly published research adopting the "AI as an ability" perspective of AI with limited theoretical and empirical studies on AI adoption, use and impact. Research limitations/implications First, the framework is based on the perceptions of AI by a limited number of companies, although it includes all the companies leading current AI practices. Secondly, the IS literature reviewed is limited to a handful of journals. Thus, the conclusions may not be generalizable. However, they remain true for the articles reviewed, and they all come from well-respected IS journals. Originality/value This is the first study to consider the practitioner's AI perspective in designing a conceptual framework for AI research classification. The proposed framework and research agenda are used to show how IS could become a reference discipline in contemporary AI research.
引用
收藏
页码:645 / 678
页数:34
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Understanding the dilemma of explainable artificial intelligence: a proposal for a ritual dialog framework
    Aorigele Bao
    Yi Zeng
    Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11
  • [42] Trust in artificial intelligence: From a Foundational Trust Framework to emerging research opportunities PREFACE
    Lukyanenko, Roman
    Maass, Wolfgang
    Storey, Veda C.
    ELECTRONIC MARKETS, 2022, 32 (04) : 1993 - 2020
  • [43] Implementing and scaling artificial intelligence: A review, framework, and research agenda
    Haefner, Naomi
    Parida, Vinit
    Gassmann, Oliver
    Wincent, Joakim
    TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2023, 197
  • [44] Artificial intelligence in interactive marketing: a conceptual framework and research agenda
    Peltier, James W.
    Dahl, Andrew J.
    Schibrowsky, John A.
    JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN INTERACTIVE MARKETING, 2024, 18 (01) : 54 - 90
  • [45] Framework for Guiding Artificial Intelligence Research in Combat Casualty Care
    Wong, Kenneth H.
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2019: IMAGING INFORMATICS FOR HEALTHCARE, RESEARCH, AND APPLICATIONS, 2019, 10954
  • [46] Artificial intelligence and innovation management: A review, framework, and research agenda
    Haefner, Naomi
    Wincent, Joakim
    Parida, Vinit
    Gassmann, Oliver
    TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2021, 162
  • [47] Artificial Intelligence for Practice
    McMillan, Nigel
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 16 : 102 - 103
  • [48] The Clinical Practice Integration of Artificial Intelligence (CPI-AI) framework
    Farrow, L.
    Meek, D.
    Leontidis, G.
    Campbell, M.
    Harrison, E.
    Anderson, L.
    BONE & JOINT RESEARCH, 2024, 13 (09): : 507 - 512
  • [49] Developing an understanding of artificial intelligence lung nodule risk prediction using insights from the Brock model
    Madhurima R. Chetan
    Nicholas Dowson
    Noah Waterfield Price
    Sarim Ather
    Angus Nicolson
    Fergus V. Gleeson
    European Radiology, 2022, 32 : 5330 - 5338
  • [50] Developing an understanding of artificial intelligence lung nodule risk prediction using insights from the Brock model
    Chetan, Madhurima R.
    Dowson, Nicholas
    Price, Noah Waterfield
    Ather, Sarim
    Nicolson, Angus
    Gleeson, Fergus, V
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2022, 32 (08) : 5330 - 5338