A framework for understanding artificial intelligence research: insights from practice

被引:36
|
作者
Bawack, Ransome Epie [1 ]
Fosso Wamba, Samuel [2 ]
Carillo, Kevin Daniel Andre [2 ]
机构
[1] Toulouse Capitole Univ, TBS Business Sch, Res Ctr, Toulouse, France
[2] TBS Business Sch, Toulouse, France
关键词
Artificial intelligence; Industry context; Literature review; Fortune; 500; Information systems research; MACHINE LEARNING APPROACH; DECISION-SUPPORT-SYSTEM; DEEP NEURAL-NETWORKS; TEXT ANALYTICS; BIG DATA; INFORMATION-TECHNOLOGY; RECOMMENDER SYSTEMS; USER ACCEPTANCE; PREDICTION; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1108/JEIM-07-2020-0284
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Purpose The current evolution of artificial intelligence (AI) practices and applications is creating a disconnection between modern-day information system (IS) research and practices. The purpose of this study is to propose a classification framework that connects the IS discipline to contemporary AI practices. Design/methodology/approach We conducted a review of practitioner literature to derive our framework's key dimensions. We reviewed 103 documents on AI published by 25 leading technology companies ranked in the 2019 list of Fortune 500 companies. After that, we reviewed and classified 110 information system (IS) publications on AI using our proposed framework to demonstrate its ability to classify IS research on AI and reveal relevant research gaps. Findings Practitioners have adopted different definitional perspectives of AI (field of study, concept, ability, system), explaining the differences in the development, implementation and expectations from AI experienced today. All these perspectives suggest that perception, comprehension, action and learning are the four capabilities AI artifacts must possess. However, leading IS journals have mostly published research adopting the "AI as an ability" perspective of AI with limited theoretical and empirical studies on AI adoption, use and impact. Research limitations/implications First, the framework is based on the perceptions of AI by a limited number of companies, although it includes all the companies leading current AI practices. Secondly, the IS literature reviewed is limited to a handful of journals. Thus, the conclusions may not be generalizable. However, they remain true for the articles reviewed, and they all come from well-respected IS journals. Originality/value This is the first study to consider the practitioner's AI perspective in designing a conceptual framework for AI research classification. The proposed framework and research agenda are used to show how IS could become a reference discipline in contemporary AI research.
引用
收藏
页码:645 / 678
页数:34
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Creativity Assessment, Research, and Practice in the Age of Artificial Intelligence
    Acar, Selcuk
    CREATIVITY RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2023,
  • [32] Artificial Intelligence in Practice: Implications for Information Systems Research
    Bawack, Ransome Epie
    Wamba, Samuel Fosso
    Carillo, Kevin Daniel Andre
    25TH AMERICAS CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION SYSTEMS (AMCIS 2019), 2019,
  • [33] Artificial Intelligence and Educational Policy: Bridging Research and Practice
    Isotani, Seiji
    Bittencourt, Ig Ibert
    Walker, Erin
    ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN EDUCATION. POSTERS AND LATE BREAKING RESULTS, WORKSHOPS AND TUTORIALS, INDUSTRY AND INNOVATION TRACKS, PRACTITIONERS, DOCTORAL CONSORTIUM AND BLUE SKY, AIED 2023, 2023, 1831 : 63 - 68
  • [34] Artificial intelligence and inequality: insights from the Philippines
    Alibudbud, Rowalt
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2024, 46 (03) : e545 - e546
  • [35] Understanding of Artificial Intelligence for Islamic Education Support and Service: Insights from Empirical Literature Review
    Musolin, Mukhamad Hadi
    Ismail, Mohamad Hazli
    Farhan, Moh
    Rois, Nur
    Ismail, Azman
    Huda, Miftachul
    Rohim, Moh Abdul
    PROCEEDINGS OF NINTH INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY, VOL 9, ICICT 2024, 2025, 1054 : 27 - 43
  • [36] Learning at the Boundaries of Research and Practice: A Framework for Understanding Research-Practice Partnerships
    Farrell, Caitlin C.
    Penuel, William R.
    Allen, Annie
    Anderson, Eleanor R.
    Bohannon, Angel X.
    Coburn, Cynthia E.
    Brown, Stephanie L.
    EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHER, 2022, 51 (03) : 197 - 208
  • [37] Advancing Health Equity Through Artificial Intelligence: An Educational Framework for Preparing Nurses in Clinical Practice and Research
    Cary Jr, Michael P.
    De Gagne, Jennie C.
    Kauschinger, Elaine D.
    Carter, Brigit M.
    CREATIVE NURSING, 2024, 30 (02) : 154 - 164
  • [38] Artificial Intelligence Reshapes Supply Chain and Lean: Framework and Main Insights
    Amrani, Anne Zouggar
    Cormican, Kathryn
    Hernandez, Diego Ruiz
    ADVANCES IN PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS-PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS FOR VOLATILE, UNCERTAIN, COMPLEX, AND AMBIGUOUS ENVIRONMENTS, APMS 2024, PT III, 2024, 730 : 61 - 74
  • [39] Understanding the dilemma of explainable artificial intelligence: a proposal for a ritual dialog framework
    Bao, Aorigele
    Zeng, Yi
    HUMANITIES & SOCIAL SCIENCES COMMUNICATIONS, 2024, 11 (01):
  • [40] Pause artificial intelligence research? Understanding AI policy challenges
    Goldfarb, Avi
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS-REVUE CANADIENNE D ECONOMIQUE, 2024, 57 (02): : 363 - 377