A framework for understanding artificial intelligence research: insights from practice

被引:36
|
作者
Bawack, Ransome Epie [1 ]
Fosso Wamba, Samuel [2 ]
Carillo, Kevin Daniel Andre [2 ]
机构
[1] Toulouse Capitole Univ, TBS Business Sch, Res Ctr, Toulouse, France
[2] TBS Business Sch, Toulouse, France
关键词
Artificial intelligence; Industry context; Literature review; Fortune; 500; Information systems research; MACHINE LEARNING APPROACH; DECISION-SUPPORT-SYSTEM; DEEP NEURAL-NETWORKS; TEXT ANALYTICS; BIG DATA; INFORMATION-TECHNOLOGY; RECOMMENDER SYSTEMS; USER ACCEPTANCE; PREDICTION; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1108/JEIM-07-2020-0284
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Purpose The current evolution of artificial intelligence (AI) practices and applications is creating a disconnection between modern-day information system (IS) research and practices. The purpose of this study is to propose a classification framework that connects the IS discipline to contemporary AI practices. Design/methodology/approach We conducted a review of practitioner literature to derive our framework's key dimensions. We reviewed 103 documents on AI published by 25 leading technology companies ranked in the 2019 list of Fortune 500 companies. After that, we reviewed and classified 110 information system (IS) publications on AI using our proposed framework to demonstrate its ability to classify IS research on AI and reveal relevant research gaps. Findings Practitioners have adopted different definitional perspectives of AI (field of study, concept, ability, system), explaining the differences in the development, implementation and expectations from AI experienced today. All these perspectives suggest that perception, comprehension, action and learning are the four capabilities AI artifacts must possess. However, leading IS journals have mostly published research adopting the "AI as an ability" perspective of AI with limited theoretical and empirical studies on AI adoption, use and impact. Research limitations/implications First, the framework is based on the perceptions of AI by a limited number of companies, although it includes all the companies leading current AI practices. Secondly, the IS literature reviewed is limited to a handful of journals. Thus, the conclusions may not be generalizable. However, they remain true for the articles reviewed, and they all come from well-respected IS journals. Originality/value This is the first study to consider the practitioner's AI perspective in designing a conceptual framework for AI research classification. The proposed framework and research agenda are used to show how IS could become a reference discipline in contemporary AI research.
引用
收藏
页码:645 / 678
页数:34
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Shaping the Governance Framework towards the Artificial Intelligence from the Responsible Research and Innovation
    Zhang, Han
    Gao, Lu
    2019 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED ROBOTICS AND ITS SOCIAL IMPACTS (ARSO), 2019, : 213 - 218
  • [22] Trust in artificial intelligence: From a Foundational Trust Framework to emerging research opportunities
    Roman Lukyanenko
    Wolfgang Maass
    Veda C. Storey
    Electronic Markets, 2022, 32 : 1993 - 2020
  • [23] Responsible artificial intelligence governance: A review and research framework
    Papagiannidis, Emmanouil
    Mikalef, Patrick
    Conboy, Kieran
    JOURNAL OF STRATEGIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2025, 34 (02):
  • [24] A framework for artificial intelligence in cancer research and precision oncology
    Raquel Perez-Lopez
    Jorge S. Reis-Filho
    Jakob Nikolas Kather
    npj Precision Oncology, 7
  • [25] A framework for artificial intelligence in cancer research and precision oncology
    Perez-Lopez, Raquel
    Reis-Filho, Jorge S.
    Kather, Jakob Nikolas
    NPJ PRECISION ONCOLOGY, 2023, 7 (01)
  • [26] Artificial Intelligence in Vascular Diseases: From Clinical Practice to Medical Research and Education
    Lareyre, Fabien
    Raffort, Juliette
    ANGIOLOGY, 2025,
  • [27] Medical artificial intelligent research: translating artificial intelligence into clinical practice
    Lin, Haotian
    Yu, Limin
    ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2020, 8 (11)
  • [28] Can Artificial Intelligence Improve Psychotherapy Research and Practice?
    Rachel L. Horn
    John R. Weisz
    Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 2020, 47 : 852 - 855
  • [29] Can Artificial Intelligence Improve Psychotherapy Research and Practice?
    Horn, Rachel L.
    Weisz, John R.
    ADMINISTRATION AND POLICY IN MENTAL HEALTH AND MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2020, 47 (05) : 852 - 855
  • [30] Potential of artificial intelligence in injury prevention research and practice
    Quistberg, D. Alex
    INJURY PREVENTION, 2024, 30 (02) : 89 - 91