Sutureless aortic valve replacement with Perceval bioprosthesis: are there predicting factors for postoperative pacemaker implantation?

被引:70
|
作者
Vogt, Ferdinand [1 ]
Pfeiffer, Steffen [1 ]
Dell'Aquila, Angelo Maria [2 ]
Fischlein, Theodor [1 ]
Santarpino, Giuseppe [1 ]
机构
[1] Paracelsus Med Univ, Dept Cardiac Surg, Nurnberg, Germany
[2] Univ Hosp, Dept Cardiac Surg, Munster, Germany
关键词
Heart valve prosthesis; Pacemaker; Electrophysiology; HEART-FAILURE; TIME; ELECTROCARDIOGRAM; MULTICENTER; CARDIOLOGY; DISORDERS; COMMITTEE; STENOSIS; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1093/icvts/ivv330
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVES: Aortic valve replacement (AVR) with sutureless bioprostheses has become an alternative to conventional AVR for patients with intermediate to high operative risk. However, this technique is associated with an increased risk of postoperative conduction disorders. METHODS: We analysed 258 patients who underwent AVR with the Perceval prosthesis from July 2010 to September 2014 at our centre. Electrocardiography were obtained at baseline to record preoperatively the presence of conduction disorders. Preoperative risk factors, intraoperative procedures and complications (61 variables) were compared between patients with permanent pacemaker (PPM group) and without (no-PPM group) need for postoperative PPM implantation. RESULTS: One hundred and sixty-nine patients underwent isolated AVR with the Perceval bioprosthesis, 89 patients had associated surgery and 23 patients underwent redo operations. The mean age was 77.7 +/- 5 years, 139 patients were female (46%) and the mean logistic EuroSCORE was 13.2 +/- 11%. At baseline, 8 patients had already an implanted pacemaker. Postoperatively, 27 patients (10.5%) required new PPM implantation due to complete atrioventricular block. On univariate analysis, age (PPM vs no-PPM group: 80 +/- 5 vs 77 +/- 5 years, P = 0.009) and preoperative presence of right bundle branch block (RBBB) [overall n = 20 (7.8%); PPM vs no-PPM group: 9 vs 11 (33 vs 4.8%); P < 0.001] were identified as independent predictors of postoperative conduction disorders, but only pre-existing RBBB persisted on multivariate analysis (odds ratio 11.3-C-statistic 0.74, error estimate 0.064, confidence interval 0.672-0.801; P = 0.0002). Among patients undergoing sutureless AVR, the rate of PPM implantation was high. CONCLUSIONS: The analysis of the data collected made it possible to identify preoperatively a subset of patients undergoing sutureless AVR at higher risk of postoperative atrioventricular block. Additional surgical precautions should be implemented to prevent the occurrence of conduction disorders after sutureless AVR.
引用
收藏
页码:253 / 258
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Early Predictors of Permanent Pacemaker Implantation in Sutureless Aortic Valve Replacement with Perceval Bioprosthesis: A Conduction Disorders Analysis
    Belluschi, Igor
    Moriggia, Stefano
    Calabrese, Mariachiara
    Schiavi, Davide
    Alfieri, Ottavio
    CARDIOLOGY, 2016, 134 (02) : 245 - 245
  • [2] A pooled analysis of pacemaker implantation after Perceval sutureless aortic valve replacement
    Moscarelli, Marco
    Santarpino, Giuseppe
    Athanasiou, Thanos
    Mastroroberto, Pasquale
    Fattouch, Khalil
    Nasso, Giuseppe
    Speziale, Giuseppe
    INTERACTIVE CARDIOVASCULAR AND THORACIC SURGERY, 2021, 33 (04) : 501 - 509
  • [3] Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in degenerative sutureless perceval aortic bioprosthesis
    Landes, Uri
    Sagie, Alexander
    Kornowski, Ran
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2018, 91 (05) : 1000 - 1004
  • [4] Effect of sutureless implantation of the Perceval S aortic valve bioprosthesis on intraoperative and early postoperative outcomes
    Flameng, Willem
    Herregods, Marie-Christine
    Hermans, Hadewich
    Van der Mieren, Gerry
    Vercalsteren, Monique
    Poortmans, Gert
    Van Hemelrijck, Jan
    Meuris, Bart
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2011, 142 (06): : 1453 - 1457
  • [5] Early aortic dissection after aortic valve replacement with a Perceval sutureless bioprosthesis
    Giosuè Falcetta
    Stefano Pratali
    Giacomo Ravenni
    Uberto Bortolotti
    Indian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2019, 35 : 510 - 512
  • [6] Early aortic dissection after aortic valve replacement with a Perceval sutureless bioprosthesis
    Falcetta, Giosue
    Pratali, Stefano
    Ravenni, Giacomo
    Bortolotti, Uberto
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2019, 35 (03) : 510 - 512
  • [7] Early Outcomes of Sutureless Aortic Valve Replacement With the Perceval S Bioprosthesis
    Kosasih, Michael
    Almeida, Aubrey A.
    Smith, Julian A.
    HEART LUNG AND CIRCULATION, 2019, 28 (06): : 970 - 976
  • [8] Sutureless Perceval aortic valve implantation compared with conventional Mitroflow valve replacement
    Casha A.R.
    Manché A.
    Camilleri L.
    Yamagata K.
    Santucci S.
    Gauci M.
    Galea J.
    Indian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2018, 34 (2) : 109 - 115
  • [9] Aortic valve replacement with sutureless Perceval S bioprosthesis: Single-center experience
    Souaf-Khalafi, Souhayla
    Fernandez-Gonzalez, Angel L.
    Baluja-Gonzalez, Maria A.
    Sierra-Quiroga, Juan L.
    Adrio-Nazar, Belen
    Garcia-Carro, Javier
    Martinez-Cereijo, Jose M.
    Duran-Munoz, Dario N.
    CIRUGIA CARDIOVASCULAR, 2019, 26 (02): : 92 - 97
  • [10] Predictors of Pacemaker Insertion Post-Sutureless (Perceval) Aortic Valve Implantation
    Brookes, John D. L.
    Mathew, Manish
    Brookes, Elizabeth M.
    Jaya, Joseph S.
    Almeida, Aubrey A.
    Smith, Julian A.
    HEART LUNG AND CIRCULATION, 2021, 30 (06): : 917 - 921