Sutureless aortic valve replacement with Perceval bioprosthesis: are there predicting factors for postoperative pacemaker implantation?

被引:70
|
作者
Vogt, Ferdinand [1 ]
Pfeiffer, Steffen [1 ]
Dell'Aquila, Angelo Maria [2 ]
Fischlein, Theodor [1 ]
Santarpino, Giuseppe [1 ]
机构
[1] Paracelsus Med Univ, Dept Cardiac Surg, Nurnberg, Germany
[2] Univ Hosp, Dept Cardiac Surg, Munster, Germany
关键词
Heart valve prosthesis; Pacemaker; Electrophysiology; HEART-FAILURE; TIME; ELECTROCARDIOGRAM; MULTICENTER; CARDIOLOGY; DISORDERS; COMMITTEE; STENOSIS; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1093/icvts/ivv330
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVES: Aortic valve replacement (AVR) with sutureless bioprostheses has become an alternative to conventional AVR for patients with intermediate to high operative risk. However, this technique is associated with an increased risk of postoperative conduction disorders. METHODS: We analysed 258 patients who underwent AVR with the Perceval prosthesis from July 2010 to September 2014 at our centre. Electrocardiography were obtained at baseline to record preoperatively the presence of conduction disorders. Preoperative risk factors, intraoperative procedures and complications (61 variables) were compared between patients with permanent pacemaker (PPM group) and without (no-PPM group) need for postoperative PPM implantation. RESULTS: One hundred and sixty-nine patients underwent isolated AVR with the Perceval bioprosthesis, 89 patients had associated surgery and 23 patients underwent redo operations. The mean age was 77.7 +/- 5 years, 139 patients were female (46%) and the mean logistic EuroSCORE was 13.2 +/- 11%. At baseline, 8 patients had already an implanted pacemaker. Postoperatively, 27 patients (10.5%) required new PPM implantation due to complete atrioventricular block. On univariate analysis, age (PPM vs no-PPM group: 80 +/- 5 vs 77 +/- 5 years, P = 0.009) and preoperative presence of right bundle branch block (RBBB) [overall n = 20 (7.8%); PPM vs no-PPM group: 9 vs 11 (33 vs 4.8%); P < 0.001] were identified as independent predictors of postoperative conduction disorders, but only pre-existing RBBB persisted on multivariate analysis (odds ratio 11.3-C-statistic 0.74, error estimate 0.064, confidence interval 0.672-0.801; P = 0.0002). Among patients undergoing sutureless AVR, the rate of PPM implantation was high. CONCLUSIONS: The analysis of the data collected made it possible to identify preoperatively a subset of patients undergoing sutureless AVR at higher risk of postoperative atrioventricular block. Additional surgical precautions should be implemented to prevent the occurrence of conduction disorders after sutureless AVR.
引用
收藏
页码:253 / 258
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Electrocardiographic and clinical predictors of permanent pacemaker insertion following Perceval sutureless aortic valve implantation
    Mugnai, Giacomo
    Moran, Darragh
    Nijs, Jan
    Chierchia, Gian-Battista
    Velagic, Vedran
    Stroker, Erwin
    Hunuk, Burak
    Czapla, Jens
    Brugada, Pedro
    La Meir, Mark
    de Asmundis, Carlo
    JOURNAL OF ELECTROCARDIOLOGY, 2019, 56 : 10 - 14
  • [22] Thrombocytopenia After Aortic Valve Replacement: Comparison Between Sutureless Perceval S Valve and Perimount Magna Ease Bioprosthesis
    Mujtaba, Syed Saleem
    Ledingham, Simon
    Shah, Asif Raza
    Schueler, Stephan
    Clark, Stephen
    Pillay, Thasee
    BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2018, 33 (02) : 169 - 175
  • [23] Perceval sutureless bioprosthesis versus Perimount sutured bioprosthesis for aortic valve replacement in patients with aortic stenosis: a retrospective, propensity-matched study
    Kapadia, Sharan J.
    Salmasi, Mohammed Yousuf
    Zientara, Alicja
    Roussin, Isabelle
    Quarto, Cesare
    Asimakopoulos, George
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC SURGERY, 2024, 19 (01)
  • [24] Perceval sutureless bioprosthesis versus Perimount sutured bioprosthesis for aortic valve replacement in patients with aortic stenosis: a retrospective, propensity-matched study
    Sharan J Kapadia
    Mohammed Yousuf Salmasi
    Alicja Zientara
    Isabelle Roussin
    Cesare Quarto
    George Asimakopoulos
    Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, 19
  • [25] Sutureless aortic valve replacement in stentless bioprosthesis failure
    Kim, Jae Hyun
    Kim, Jae-Bum
    Choi, Sae Young
    INTERACTIVE CARDIOVASCULAR AND THORACIC SURGERY, 2015, 21 (06) : 801 - 802
  • [26] Left ventricular mass regression after sutureless implantation of the Perceval S aortic valve bioprosthesis: preliminary results
    Santarpino, Giuseppe
    Pfeiffer, Steffen
    Pollari, Francesco
    Concistre, Giovanni
    Vogt, Ferdinand
    Fischlein, Theodor
    INTERACTIVE CARDIOVASCULAR AND THORACIC SURGERY, 2014, 18 (01) : 38 - 42
  • [27] Sutureless bioprosthesis may increase postoperative atrial fibrillation after aortic valve replacement
    Sameer D Thakur
    Andrew Cheng
    Hansraj R Bookun
    David Lee
    Chin Siew Lee
    Xiao Bo Zhang
    Shivanand Gangahanumaiah
    Marco Moscarelli
    Giacomo Bianchi
    Pier A Farneti
    Marco Solinas
    Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, 10 (Suppl 1)
  • [28] Thrombocytopenia among Patients Undergoing Aortic Valve Replacement Using the Sutureless Perceval S Bioprosthesis: A Retrospective Study
    Jayet, Adrien
    Lu, Henri
    Monney, Pierre
    Verdugo-Marchese, Mario
    Gunga, Ziyad
    Rancati, Valentina
    Ltaief, Zied
    Kirsch, Matthias
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2024, 13 (04)
  • [29] Valve-in-Valve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation for the Failing Surgical Perceval Bioprosthesis
    Suleiman, Tariq
    Tanseco, Kristoffer
    Arunothayaraj, Sandeep
    Michail, Michael
    Cockburn, James
    Hadjivassilev, Stanislav
    Hildick-Smith, David
    CARDIOVASCULAR REVASCULARIZATION MEDICINE, 2022, 40 : S148 - S153
  • [30] Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement using the Perceval S sutureless valve
    Misfeld, Martin
    ANNALS OF CARDIOTHORACIC SURGERY, 2015, 4 (02) : 203 - 205