Sutureless aortic valve replacement with Perceval bioprosthesis: are there predicting factors for postoperative pacemaker implantation?

被引:70
|
作者
Vogt, Ferdinand [1 ]
Pfeiffer, Steffen [1 ]
Dell'Aquila, Angelo Maria [2 ]
Fischlein, Theodor [1 ]
Santarpino, Giuseppe [1 ]
机构
[1] Paracelsus Med Univ, Dept Cardiac Surg, Nurnberg, Germany
[2] Univ Hosp, Dept Cardiac Surg, Munster, Germany
关键词
Heart valve prosthesis; Pacemaker; Electrophysiology; HEART-FAILURE; TIME; ELECTROCARDIOGRAM; MULTICENTER; CARDIOLOGY; DISORDERS; COMMITTEE; STENOSIS; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1093/icvts/ivv330
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVES: Aortic valve replacement (AVR) with sutureless bioprostheses has become an alternative to conventional AVR for patients with intermediate to high operative risk. However, this technique is associated with an increased risk of postoperative conduction disorders. METHODS: We analysed 258 patients who underwent AVR with the Perceval prosthesis from July 2010 to September 2014 at our centre. Electrocardiography were obtained at baseline to record preoperatively the presence of conduction disorders. Preoperative risk factors, intraoperative procedures and complications (61 variables) were compared between patients with permanent pacemaker (PPM group) and without (no-PPM group) need for postoperative PPM implantation. RESULTS: One hundred and sixty-nine patients underwent isolated AVR with the Perceval bioprosthesis, 89 patients had associated surgery and 23 patients underwent redo operations. The mean age was 77.7 +/- 5 years, 139 patients were female (46%) and the mean logistic EuroSCORE was 13.2 +/- 11%. At baseline, 8 patients had already an implanted pacemaker. Postoperatively, 27 patients (10.5%) required new PPM implantation due to complete atrioventricular block. On univariate analysis, age (PPM vs no-PPM group: 80 +/- 5 vs 77 +/- 5 years, P = 0.009) and preoperative presence of right bundle branch block (RBBB) [overall n = 20 (7.8%); PPM vs no-PPM group: 9 vs 11 (33 vs 4.8%); P < 0.001] were identified as independent predictors of postoperative conduction disorders, but only pre-existing RBBB persisted on multivariate analysis (odds ratio 11.3-C-statistic 0.74, error estimate 0.064, confidence interval 0.672-0.801; P = 0.0002). Among patients undergoing sutureless AVR, the rate of PPM implantation was high. CONCLUSIONS: The analysis of the data collected made it possible to identify preoperatively a subset of patients undergoing sutureless AVR at higher risk of postoperative atrioventricular block. Additional surgical precautions should be implemented to prevent the occurrence of conduction disorders after sutureless AVR.
引用
收藏
页码:253 / 258
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Transcatheter aortic valve-in-valve implantation for early failure of sutureless aortic bioprosthesis
    Sun, Xiaotian
    Song, Zuorui
    Soffer, Daniel
    Pirris, John P.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIAC SURGERY, 2018, 33 (04) : 172 - 175
  • [32] Proximal dislocation of a sutureless Perceval valve after the second aortic valve replacement
    Nakamae, Kosuke
    Oshitomi, Takashi
    Hirota, Masataka
    Uesugi, Hideyuki
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2023, 39 (04) : 391 - 394
  • [33] Aortic Sutureless Perceval Valve for Small Root in Concomitant Mitral Valve Replacement
    Moriggia, Stefano
    Trumello, Cinzia
    Buzzatti, Nicola
    Iaci, Giuseppe
    Di Giannuario, Giovanna
    Alfieri, Ottavio
    JOURNAL OF HEART VALVE DISEASE, 2015, 24 (02): : 187 - 189
  • [34] Proximal dislocation of a sutureless Perceval valve after the second aortic valve replacement
    Kosuke Nakamae
    Takashi Oshitomi
    Masataka Hirota
    Hideyuki Uesugi
    Indian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2023, 39 : 391 - 394
  • [35] Sutureless bioprosthesis for aortic valve replacement: Surgical and clinical outcomes
    Ferreira, Ricardo
    Rua, Nuno
    Sena, Andre
    Velho, Tiago R.
    Goncalves, Joao
    Junqueira, Nadia
    Almeida, Ana G.
    Nobre, Angelo
    Pinto, Fausto
    JOURNAL OF CARDIAC SURGERY, 2022, 37 (12) : 4774 - 4782
  • [36] Pacemaker Implantation in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement vs. Sutureless Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: A Meta-analysis
    Turagam, Mohit
    Velagapudi, Poonam
    Agrawal, Harsh
    Mittal, Mayank
    Katta, Natraj
    Abbott, J. Dawn
    Aggarwal, Kul
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2016, 68 (18) : B101 - B101
  • [37] Emergency Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation for Acute and Early Failure of Sutureless Perceval Aortic Valve
    Durand, Eric
    Tron, Christophe
    Eltchaninoff, Helene
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2015, 31 (09) : 1204.e13 - 1204.e15
  • [38] Sutureless bioprosthesis as an alternative to conventional aortic valve replacement surgery
    Rua, N.
    Ferreira, R.
    Sena, A.
    Nobre, A.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2021, 42 : 1688 - 1688
  • [39] Risk predictors that impact long-term prognosis in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement with the Perceval sutureless bioprosthesis
    Dokollari, Aleksander
    Margaryan, Rafik
    Torregrossa, Gianluca
    Sicouri, Serge
    Cameli, Matteo
    Mandoli, Giulia Elena
    Prifti, Edvin
    Veshti, Altin
    Bonacchi, Massimo
    Gelsomino, Sandro
    CARDIOVASCULAR REVASCULARIZATION MEDICINE, 2023, 55 : 10 - 19
  • [40] Perceval Sutureless Bioprosthesis for Degenerative Aortic Valve Stenosis: Initial Experience With 67 Patients
    Lazovic, Dejan M.
    Kocica, Mladen J.
    Vucicevic, Filip
    Kocica-Karadzic, Milica
    Grujic, Milos
    Terzic, Dusko
    Dordevic, Aleksandar
    Grujic, Danko
    Cvetkovic, Dragan
    HEART SURGERY FORUM, 2021, 24 (06): : 1065 - 1069