Aortic valve replacement with sutureless Perceval S bioprosthesis: Single-center experience

被引:1
|
作者
Souaf-Khalafi, Souhayla [1 ]
Fernandez-Gonzalez, Angel L. [1 ]
Baluja-Gonzalez, Maria A. [2 ]
Sierra-Quiroga, Juan L. [1 ]
Adrio-Nazar, Belen [1 ]
Garcia-Carro, Javier [1 ]
Martinez-Cereijo, Jose M. [1 ]
Duran-Munoz, Dario N. [1 ]
机构
[1] Complejo Hosp Univ Santiago de Compostela, Serv Cirugia Cardiaca, Santiago De Compostela, Spain
[2] Complejo Hosp Univ Santiago de Compostela, Serv Anestesiol & Reanimac, Santiago De Compostela, Spain
来源
CIRUGIA CARDIOVASCULAR | 2019年 / 26卷 / 02期
关键词
Aortic valve replacement; Perceval S; Aortic valve stenosis; Biological prosthesis; Review; RISK PATIENTS; TRANSCATHETER; IMPLANTATION; PROSTHESIS; STENOSIS; MULTICENTER; OUTCOMES; COST; MINITHORACOTOMY; MORBIDITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.circv.2019.01.075
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction and objectives: Sutureless aortic valve replacement has emerged as an alternative for surgical treatment of severe aortic stenosis, especially in older patients. This is an observational, retrospective study of a group of patients from a single centre undergoing aortic valve replacement with Perceval S sutureless bioprosthesis (LivaNova, Saluggia, Italy). Methods: A total of 105 patients had an aortic valve replacement with a Perceval S bioprosthesis between June 2015 and October 2018. The combined procedures were, mitral valve replacement (n=1), tricuspid valve repair (n=2), myocardial revascularisation (n =16), and myectomy (n=1). The clinical and echocardiographic follow-up was performed at discharge, at 6 months, and yearly, after surgery. Results: The mean age was 80.5 +/- 3.8 years, and 57 (54.3%) were women. The mortality rate at 30 days was 1.9% (2 out of 105).The 30-day survival rate was 98%, and at one year it was 95%. The mean Euroscore II was 3.8% + 5.5%. The cardiopulmonary bypass and ischaemia times were 58.4 +/- 41.8 min, and 44 +/- 19.9 min for isolated aortic valve replacement, 94.2 +/- 44.1 min and 73.9 +/- 35.6 min for combined procedures, respectively. The mean trans-prosthetic gradient was 13.5 +/- 4.9 mmHg. The left ventricle function increased from 56.8% +/- 10.8% to 58.6% +/- 11.1%. Only 7 patients have required a definitive pacemaker implant (6.7%). Only 2 patients presented with a moderate para-valvular leak that did not require any treatment. Conclusions: Aortic valve replacement with the Perceval S sutureless bioprosthesis is associated with low mortality and excellent clinical and haemodynamic behaviour, especially in elderly patients. (C) 2019 Sociedad Espanola de Cirugia Toracica-Cardiovascular. Published by Elsevier Espana, S.L.U.
引用
收藏
页码:92 / 97
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Minimally Invasive Sutureless Aortic Valve Replacement With the Perceval S Bioprosthesis Through Ministernotomy: A Single-Center Experience
    Ramsaransing, Krishan
    Hindori, Vikash
    Kougioumtzoglou, Athina
    Kaya, Abdullah
    Verbeek, Eva
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2020, 12 (10)
  • [2] Aortic Valve Replacement with the Perceval S Bioprosthesis: Single-Center Experience in 143 Patients
    Zannis, Konstantinos
    Joffre, Jeremie
    Czitrom, Daniel
    Folliguet, Thierry
    Noghin, Milena
    Lansac, Emmanuel
    Mitchell-Heggs, Laurens
    Debauchez, Mathieu
    Laborde, Francois
    JOURNAL OF HEART VALVE DISEASE, 2014, 23 (06): : 795 - 802
  • [3] Aortic Valve Replacement With Perceval Bioprosthesis: Single-Center Experience With 617 Implants
    Concistre, Giovanni
    Chiaramonti, Francesca
    Bianchi, Giacomo
    Cerillo, Alfredo
    Murzi, Michele
    Margaryan, Rafik
    Farneti, Pierandrea
    Solinas, Marco
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2018, 105 (01): : 40 - 46
  • [4] Early Outcomes of Sutureless Aortic Valve Replacement With the Perceval S Bioprosthesis
    Kosasih, Michael
    Almeida, Aubrey A.
    Smith, Julian A.
    HEART LUNG AND CIRCULATION, 2019, 28 (06): : 970 - 976
  • [5] Sutureless aortic bioprosthesis: Competitor or alternative for transcatheter aortic valve implantation? Single center experience with Perceval valves
    Olasinska-Wisniewska, Anna
    Buczkowski, Piotr
    Perek, Bartlomiej
    Puslecki, Mateusz
    Bocianski, Michal
    Stefaniak, Sebastian
    Urbanowicz, Tomasz
    Grygier, Marek
    Esiak, Maciej L.
    Jemielity, Marek
    CARDIOLOGY JOURNAL, 2022, 29 (04) : 724 - 726
  • [6] Early aortic dissection after aortic valve replacement with a Perceval sutureless bioprosthesis
    Giosuè Falcetta
    Stefano Pratali
    Giacomo Ravenni
    Uberto Bortolotti
    Indian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2019, 35 : 510 - 512
  • [7] Early aortic dissection after aortic valve replacement with a Perceval sutureless bioprosthesis
    Falcetta, Giosue
    Pratali, Stefano
    Ravenni, Giacomo
    Bortolotti, Uberto
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2019, 35 (03) : 510 - 512
  • [8] Aortic Valve Replacement with the Mitroflow Pericardial Bioprosthesis: Single-Center Experience
    Savini, C.
    Careddu, L.
    Pantaleo, A.
    Pilato, E.
    Suarez, S. Martin
    Folesani, G.
    Rasovic, O.
    Ferlito, M.
    Moretti, C.
    Di Bartolomeo, R.
    CARDIOLOGY, 2010, 115 (04) : 285 - 286
  • [9] North American single-center experience with a sutureless aortic bioprosthesis
    de Varennes, Benoit
    Lachapelle, Kevin
    Cecere, Renzo
    Szczepkowski, Isabel
    Buithieu, Jean
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2016, 151 (03): : 735 - 742
  • [10] Sutureless Aortic Valve Replacement: First-Year Single-Center Experience
    Santarpino, Giuseppe
    Pfeiffer, Steffen
    Schmidt, Joachim
    Concistre, Giovanni
    Fischlein, Theodor
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2012, 94 (02): : 504 - 509