Primary Maxillary Reconstruction With Fibula Flap and Dental Implants : A Comparative Study Between Virtual Surgical Planning and Standard in Class IIC Defects

被引:15
|
作者
Navarro Cuellar, Carlos [1 ]
Bullejos Martinez, Elena [1 ]
Navarro Cuellar, Ignacio [1 ]
Lopez Lopez, Ana Maria [1 ]
Tousidonis Rial, Manuel [1 ]
Sanchez Perez, Arturo [2 ]
Salmeron Escobar, Jose Ignacio [1 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Gen Univ Gregorio Maranon, Maxillofacial Surg Dept, Madrid, Spain
[2] Univ Murcia, Fac Odontol, Murcia, Spain
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.joms.2020.08.003
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: Oncological patients who undergo bilateral subtotal maxillectomies develop functional and esthetic sequelae that require immediate reconstruction. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the primary reconstruction of maxillary defects with fibula flap and dental implants assisted by virtual surgical planning (VSP) and to assess the postoperative outcomes compared with standard surgery. Material and Methods: A retrospective study was designed between January 2016 and April 2020 with 12 oncologic patients who underwent subtotal bilateral maxillectomy. Six consecutive patients were treated by standard surgical procedure (SS) at the beginning of the study. In 2018, the VSP was implemented, and 6 consecutive patients were treated using this technique. All patients were rehabilitated with Ticare implants and implant prostheses. Anatomic position of the bone, bone apposition, change of vertical distance, and horizontal shift, the operative and ischemia time, the esthetic results, and the functional rehabilitation were evaluated and compared. Results: The position of the bone in anatomical position was 100% in the VSP group vs 66% in the SS group. The bone apposition was 100% in the VSP group vs 83.3%. The change of vertical distance and the horizontal shift were lower in the VSP group (P < .05). The ischemia time and operative time were shorter in the VSP group (P < .05). A good esthetic result was achieved in 83.3% in the VSP group vs 33.3% in the SS group; 81 dental implants and 1 zygomatic implant were placed. The success rate was 95% in the VSP group and 92.6% in the SS group. All patients were rehabilitated with implant prosthesis. Conclusions: VSP improves the accuracy of midface reconstruction (class IIC defect) with a better anatomical position of the bone, a higher rate of bone contact, and a lower change in vertical distance compared with standard surgery. It significantly improves the esthetic result, reduces ischemia time, and operation time. (C) 2020 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons
引用
收藏
页码:237 / 248
页数:12
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [41] Comparison of surgical outcomes between primary plate and fibular flap transfer for reconstruction of segmental mandibular defects
    Huang, Tzu-Huan
    Kuo, Pao-Jen
    Liu, Chung-Ji
    MICROSURGERY, 2021, 41 (04) : 327 - 334
  • [42] Reconstruction of Hand and Foot Defects with Free Serratus Carpaccio Flap and Free Serratus Fascia Flap: A Comparative Retrospective Study of Surgical Outcomes
    Tee, Jia Wei
    Bigdeli, Amir K.
    Thomas, Benjamin
    Falkner, Florian
    Didzun, Oliver
    Vollbach, Felix H.
    Kneser, Ulrich
    Gazyakan, Emre
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (09)
  • [43] The Cost Utility of Virtual Surgical Planning and Computer-Assisted Design/Computer-Assisted Manufacturing in Mandible Reconstruction Using the Free Fibula Osteocutaneous Flap
    Kurlander, David E.
    Garvey, Patrick B.
    Largo, Rene D.
    Yu, Peirong
    Chang, Edward, I
    Hanasono, Matthew M.
    Mericli, Alexander F.
    JOURNAL OF RECONSTRUCTIVE MICROSURGERY, 2023, 39 (03) : 221 - 230
  • [44] Functional Outcomes After Surgical Resection of Tongue Cancer; A Comparative Study Between Primary Closure, Secondary Intention Healing and Flap Reconstruction
    Ravindra, Aditi
    Nayak, Dipak Ranjan
    Devaraja, K.
    Matthew, Neethu M.
    Tiwari, Shivani
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY AND HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2022, 74 (SUPPL 3) : 6296 - 6306
  • [45] Functional Outcomes After Surgical Resection of Tongue Cancer; A Comparative Study Between Primary Closure, Secondary Intention Healing and Flap Reconstruction
    Aditi Ravindra
    Dipak Ranjan Nayak
    K. Devaraja
    Neethu M. Matthew
    Shivani Tiwari
    Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, 2022, 74 : 6296 - 6306
  • [46] A comparative study of the accuracy between two computer-aided surgical simulation methods in virtual surgical planning
    da Silva Ferraz, Flavio Wellington
    Iwaki-Filho, Liogi
    de Souza-Pinto, Gustavo Nascimento
    Vessoni Iwaki, Lilian Cristina
    Li, An Tien
    Cardoso, Mauricio de Almeida
    JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2021, 49 (02) : 84 - 92
  • [47] 3D printing for virtual surgical planning of nasoseptal flap skull-base reconstruction: A proof-of-concept study
    Kayastha, Darpan
    Wiznia, Daniel
    Manes, R. Peter
    Omay, Sacit Bulent
    Khoury, Tawfiq
    Rimmer, Ryan
    INTERNATIONAL FORUM OF ALLERGY & RHINOLOGY, 2023, 13 (11) : 2073 - 2075
  • [48] Short- and long-term outcomes of three-dimensional printed surgical guides and virtual surgical planning versus conventional methods for fibula free flap reconstruction of the mandible: Decreased nonunion and complication rates
    May, Matthew M.
    Howe, Benjamin M.
    O'Byrne, Thomas J.
    Alexander, Amy E.
    Morris, Jonathon M.
    Moore, Eric J.
    Kasperbauer, Jan L.
    Janus, Jeffrey R.
    Van Abel, Kathryn M.
    Dickens, Hunter J.
    Price, Daniel L.
    HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2021, 43 (08): : 2342 - 2352
  • [49] A comparative analysis of dual-axis implants placed into maxillary anterior extraction sockets versus virtual planning with uniaxial implants: A simulated cone beam computed tomography study of implant length and diameter
    Song, Seung Jun
    Chu, Stephanie M.
    Chu, Stephen J.
    Saito, Hanae
    Levin, Barry P.
    Egbert, Nicholas L.
    Sarnachiaro, Guido O.
    Tarnow, Dennis P.
    JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC AND RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 2023, 35 (01) : 206 - 214