Primary Maxillary Reconstruction With Fibula Flap and Dental Implants : A Comparative Study Between Virtual Surgical Planning and Standard in Class IIC Defects

被引:15
|
作者
Navarro Cuellar, Carlos [1 ]
Bullejos Martinez, Elena [1 ]
Navarro Cuellar, Ignacio [1 ]
Lopez Lopez, Ana Maria [1 ]
Tousidonis Rial, Manuel [1 ]
Sanchez Perez, Arturo [2 ]
Salmeron Escobar, Jose Ignacio [1 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Gen Univ Gregorio Maranon, Maxillofacial Surg Dept, Madrid, Spain
[2] Univ Murcia, Fac Odontol, Murcia, Spain
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.joms.2020.08.003
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: Oncological patients who undergo bilateral subtotal maxillectomies develop functional and esthetic sequelae that require immediate reconstruction. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the primary reconstruction of maxillary defects with fibula flap and dental implants assisted by virtual surgical planning (VSP) and to assess the postoperative outcomes compared with standard surgery. Material and Methods: A retrospective study was designed between January 2016 and April 2020 with 12 oncologic patients who underwent subtotal bilateral maxillectomy. Six consecutive patients were treated by standard surgical procedure (SS) at the beginning of the study. In 2018, the VSP was implemented, and 6 consecutive patients were treated using this technique. All patients were rehabilitated with Ticare implants and implant prostheses. Anatomic position of the bone, bone apposition, change of vertical distance, and horizontal shift, the operative and ischemia time, the esthetic results, and the functional rehabilitation were evaluated and compared. Results: The position of the bone in anatomical position was 100% in the VSP group vs 66% in the SS group. The bone apposition was 100% in the VSP group vs 83.3%. The change of vertical distance and the horizontal shift were lower in the VSP group (P < .05). The ischemia time and operative time were shorter in the VSP group (P < .05). A good esthetic result was achieved in 83.3% in the VSP group vs 33.3% in the SS group; 81 dental implants and 1 zygomatic implant were placed. The success rate was 95% in the VSP group and 92.6% in the SS group. All patients were rehabilitated with implant prosthesis. Conclusions: VSP improves the accuracy of midface reconstruction (class IIC defect) with a better anatomical position of the bone, a higher rate of bone contact, and a lower change in vertical distance compared with standard surgery. It significantly improves the esthetic result, reduces ischemia time, and operation time. (C) 2020 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons
引用
收藏
页码:237 / 248
页数:12
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [11] A Novel Approach to Virtual Surgical Planning for Mandibular and Midfacial Reconstruction With a Fibula Free Flap
    Kalachi, Kourosh
    Highstein, Mallory J.
    Shikara, Meryam
    Hirsch, Jeffrey
    Vakharia, Kalpesh T.
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2022, 33 (03) : 759 - 763
  • [12] New approach for virtual surgical planning and mandibular reconstruction using a fibula free flap
    Mottini, Matthias
    Jafari, S. M. Seyed
    Shafighi, Maziar
    Schaller, Benoit
    ORAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 59 : E6 - E9
  • [13] Virtual Surgical Planning and Customized Subperiosteal Titanium Maxillary Implant (CSTMI) for Three Dimensional Reconstruction and Dental Implants of Maxillary Defects after Oncological Resection: Case Series
    Cebrian Carretero, Jose Luis
    Del Castillo Pardo de Vera, Jose Luis
    Montesdeoca Garcia, Nestor
    Garrido Martinez, Pablo
    Pampin Martinez, Marta Maria
    Aragon Nino, Inigo
    Navarro Cuellar, Ignacio
    Navarro Cuellar, Carlos
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (15)
  • [14] The Latest Evolution in Virtual Surgical Planning: Customized Reconstruction Plates in Free Fibula Flap Mandibular Reconstruction
    Lee, Z-Hye
    Alfonso, Allyson R.
    Ramly, Elie P.
    Kantar, Rami S.
    Yu, Jason W.
    Daar, David
    Hirsch, David L.
    Jacobson, Adam
    Levine, Jamie P.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2020, 146 (04) : 872 - 879
  • [15] Virtual Surgical Planning for Mandible Reconstruction With a Double Barrel Fibula Flap and Immediate Implant Placement
    Berrone, Mattia
    Crosetti, Erika
    Battiston, Bruno
    Succo, Giovanni
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2020, 31 (01) : E41 - E43
  • [16] Evaluation of virtual surgical planning systems and customized devices in fibula free flap mandibular reconstruction
    Blanc, Jacques
    Fuchsmann, Carine
    Nistiriuc-Muntean, Veronica
    Jacquenot, Pierre
    Philouze, Pierre
    Ceruse, Philippe
    EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 2019, 276 (12) : 3477 - 3486
  • [17] Evaluation of virtual surgical planning systems and customized devices in fibula free flap mandibular reconstruction
    Jacques Blanc
    Carine Fuchsmann
    Veronica Nistiriuc-Muntean
    Pierre Jacquenot
    Pierre Philouze
    Philippe Ceruse
    European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 2019, 276 : 3477 - 3486
  • [18] Discussion: The Latest Evolution in Virtual Surgical Planning: Customized Reconstruction Plates in Free Fibula Flap Mandibular Reconstruction
    Largo, Rene D.
    Chang, Edward I.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2020, 146 (04) : 880 - 881
  • [19] Virtual Surgical Planning in Subscapular System Free Flap Reconstruction of Midface Defects
    Swendseid, Brian P.
    Roden, Dylan F.
    Vimawala, Swar
    Richa, Tony
    Sweeny, Larissa
    Goldman, Richard A.
    Luginbuhl, Adam
    Heffelfinger, Ryan N.
    Khanna, Shachika
    Curry, Joseph M.
    ORAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 101
  • [20] Making the Case for Virtual Surgical Planning: Bilateral Sequential Fibula Flaps with Immediate Dental Implants for Maxillectomy
    Taylor, Erin M.
    Vorstenbosch, Joshua
    Morrison, Edwin
    Janssen, Pierce L.
    Kronstadt, Kenneth L.
    Randazzo, Joseph
    Rosen, Evan B.
    Cordeiro, Peter G.
    Shahzad, Farooq
    Ganly, Ian
    Matros, Evan
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2023, 152 (04) : 707E - 711E