Primary Maxillary Reconstruction With Fibula Flap and Dental Implants : A Comparative Study Between Virtual Surgical Planning and Standard in Class IIC Defects

被引:15
|
作者
Navarro Cuellar, Carlos [1 ]
Bullejos Martinez, Elena [1 ]
Navarro Cuellar, Ignacio [1 ]
Lopez Lopez, Ana Maria [1 ]
Tousidonis Rial, Manuel [1 ]
Sanchez Perez, Arturo [2 ]
Salmeron Escobar, Jose Ignacio [1 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Gen Univ Gregorio Maranon, Maxillofacial Surg Dept, Madrid, Spain
[2] Univ Murcia, Fac Odontol, Murcia, Spain
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.joms.2020.08.003
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: Oncological patients who undergo bilateral subtotal maxillectomies develop functional and esthetic sequelae that require immediate reconstruction. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the primary reconstruction of maxillary defects with fibula flap and dental implants assisted by virtual surgical planning (VSP) and to assess the postoperative outcomes compared with standard surgery. Material and Methods: A retrospective study was designed between January 2016 and April 2020 with 12 oncologic patients who underwent subtotal bilateral maxillectomy. Six consecutive patients were treated by standard surgical procedure (SS) at the beginning of the study. In 2018, the VSP was implemented, and 6 consecutive patients were treated using this technique. All patients were rehabilitated with Ticare implants and implant prostheses. Anatomic position of the bone, bone apposition, change of vertical distance, and horizontal shift, the operative and ischemia time, the esthetic results, and the functional rehabilitation were evaluated and compared. Results: The position of the bone in anatomical position was 100% in the VSP group vs 66% in the SS group. The bone apposition was 100% in the VSP group vs 83.3%. The change of vertical distance and the horizontal shift were lower in the VSP group (P < .05). The ischemia time and operative time were shorter in the VSP group (P < .05). A good esthetic result was achieved in 83.3% in the VSP group vs 33.3% in the SS group; 81 dental implants and 1 zygomatic implant were placed. The success rate was 95% in the VSP group and 92.6% in the SS group. All patients were rehabilitated with implant prosthesis. Conclusions: VSP improves the accuracy of midface reconstruction (class IIC defect) with a better anatomical position of the bone, a higher rate of bone contact, and a lower change in vertical distance compared with standard surgery. It significantly improves the esthetic result, reduces ischemia time, and operation time. (C) 2020 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons
引用
收藏
页码:237 / 248
页数:12
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [21] Three-Dimensional Accuracy of Virtual Planning and Surgical Navigation for Mandibular Reconstruction With Free Fibula Flap
    Yu, Yao
    Zhang, Wen-Bo
    Liu, Xiao-Jing
    Guo, Chuan-Bin
    Yu, Guang-Yan
    Peng, Xin
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2016, 74 (07) : 1503.e1 - 1503.e10
  • [22] Virtual Surgical Planning for Mandibular Reconstruction With the Fibula Free Flap A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Barr, Meaghan L.
    Haveles, Christos S.
    Rezzadeh, Kameron S.
    Nolan, Ian T.
    Castro, Ruben
    Lee, Justine C.
    Steinbacher, Derek
    Pfaff, Miles J.
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2020, 84 (01) : 117 - 122
  • [23] Mandibular Reconstruction With Fibula Flap and Dental Implants Through Virtual Surgical Planning and Three Different Techniques: Double-Barrel Flap, Implant Dynamic Navigation and CAD/CAM Mesh With Iliac Crest Graft
    Antunez-Conde, Raul
    Salmeron, Jose Ignacio
    Diez-Montiel, Alberto
    Agea, Marc
    Gascon, Dafne
    Sada, Angela
    Navarro Cuellar, Ignacio
    Tousidonis, Manuel
    Ochandiano, Santiago
    Arenas, Gema
    Navarro Cuellar, Carlos
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2021, 11
  • [24] Virtual surgical planning in fibula free flap head and neck reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Tang, Nicholas S. J.
    Ahmadi, Iraj
    Ramakrishnan, Anand
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2019, 72 (09): : 1465 - 1477
  • [25] Virtual surgical planning for maxillary reconstruction with the scapular free flap: An evaluation of a simple cutting guide design
    Khanh Linh Tran
    Kwon, Jae Young
    Gui, Xi Yao
    Wang, Edward
    Yang, David
    Durham, James Scott
    Prisman, Eitan
    HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2023, 45 (01): : 115 - 125
  • [26] The use of 3D virtual surgical planning and computer aided design in reconstruction of maxillary surgical defects
    Glas, Haye H.
    Vosselman, Nathalie
    de Visscher, Sebastiaan A. H. J.
    CURRENT OPINION IN OTOLARYNGOLOGY & HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2020, 28 (02): : 122 - 128
  • [27] Virtual Surgical Guidance Improves Quality of Life Following Scapular Free-Flap Reconstruction of Maxillary Defects
    Alwadeai, Mohamed
    Al-aroomy, Leena
    Amin, Ayman
    Shindy, Mostafa
    Zedan, Mohamed
    Baz, Safaa
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2024, 82 (05) : 600 - 609
  • [28] Impact of virtual surgical planning and three-dimensional modeling on time to surgery in mandibular reconstruction by free fibula flap
    Villarme, A.
    Pace-Loscos, Tanguy
    Schiappa, Renaud
    Poissonnet, Gilles
    Dassonville, Olivier
    Chamorey, Emmanuel
    Bozec, Alexandre
    Culie, Dorian
    EJSO, 2024, 50 (03):
  • [29] Utilization of Three-Dimensional Computer-Aided Preoperative Virtual Planning and Manufacturing in Maxillary and Mandibular Reconstruction with a Microvascular Fibula Flap
    Kaariainen, Minna
    Kuuskeri, Marika
    Gremoutis, Georgios
    Kuokkanen, Hannu
    Miettinen, Aimo
    Laranne, Jussi
    JOURNAL OF RECONSTRUCTIVE MICROSURGERY, 2016, 32 (02) : 137 - 141
  • [30] Functional and esthetic outcomes of virtual surgical planning versus the conventional technique in mandibular reconstruction with a free fibula flap: A retrospective study of 24 cases
    Garajei, Ata
    Modarresi, Alireza
    Arabkheradmand, Ali
    Shirkhoda, Mohammad
    JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2024, 52 (04) : 454 - 463