Primary Maxillary Reconstruction With Fibula Flap and Dental Implants : A Comparative Study Between Virtual Surgical Planning and Standard in Class IIC Defects

被引:15
|
作者
Navarro Cuellar, Carlos [1 ]
Bullejos Martinez, Elena [1 ]
Navarro Cuellar, Ignacio [1 ]
Lopez Lopez, Ana Maria [1 ]
Tousidonis Rial, Manuel [1 ]
Sanchez Perez, Arturo [2 ]
Salmeron Escobar, Jose Ignacio [1 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Gen Univ Gregorio Maranon, Maxillofacial Surg Dept, Madrid, Spain
[2] Univ Murcia, Fac Odontol, Murcia, Spain
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.joms.2020.08.003
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: Oncological patients who undergo bilateral subtotal maxillectomies develop functional and esthetic sequelae that require immediate reconstruction. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the primary reconstruction of maxillary defects with fibula flap and dental implants assisted by virtual surgical planning (VSP) and to assess the postoperative outcomes compared with standard surgery. Material and Methods: A retrospective study was designed between January 2016 and April 2020 with 12 oncologic patients who underwent subtotal bilateral maxillectomy. Six consecutive patients were treated by standard surgical procedure (SS) at the beginning of the study. In 2018, the VSP was implemented, and 6 consecutive patients were treated using this technique. All patients were rehabilitated with Ticare implants and implant prostheses. Anatomic position of the bone, bone apposition, change of vertical distance, and horizontal shift, the operative and ischemia time, the esthetic results, and the functional rehabilitation were evaluated and compared. Results: The position of the bone in anatomical position was 100% in the VSP group vs 66% in the SS group. The bone apposition was 100% in the VSP group vs 83.3%. The change of vertical distance and the horizontal shift were lower in the VSP group (P < .05). The ischemia time and operative time were shorter in the VSP group (P < .05). A good esthetic result was achieved in 83.3% in the VSP group vs 33.3% in the SS group; 81 dental implants and 1 zygomatic implant were placed. The success rate was 95% in the VSP group and 92.6% in the SS group. All patients were rehabilitated with implant prosthesis. Conclusions: VSP improves the accuracy of midface reconstruction (class IIC defect) with a better anatomical position of the bone, a higher rate of bone contact, and a lower change in vertical distance compared with standard surgery. It significantly improves the esthetic result, reduces ischemia time, and operation time. (C) 2020 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons
引用
收藏
页码:237 / 248
页数:12
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [1] Virtual surgical planning for combined nasal, dental and maxillary reconstruction with the prefabricated fibula flap
    Manzie, Timothy
    Howes, Dale
    Leinkram, David
    Fleming, Sophie
    Clark, Jonathan R.
    Dunn, Masako
    Elliott, Michael
    Low, Tsu-Hui
    ORAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 136
  • [2] Evaluation of virtual surgical planning and three-dimensional configurations for reconstruction of maxillary defects using the fibula free flap
    Barrantes Verdoy, Sergi
    Sadeghi, Payam
    Lopez Ojeda, Anna
    Palacin Porte, Jose A.
    Vinyals Vinyals, Joan M.
    Huesa Barcelo, Lia
    Cisa Lluis, Enric
    Gonzalez Compta, Xavier
    Torres Diaz, Alberto
    Bermejo Segu, Josep Oriol
    MICROSURGERY, 2022, 42 (08) : 749 - 756
  • [3] Special considerations in virtual surgical planning for secondary accurate maxillary reconstruction with vascularised fibula osteomyocutaneous flap
    Shen, Yi
    Sun, Jian
    Li, Jun
    Li, Mei-mei
    Huang, Wei
    Ow, Andrew
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2012, 65 (07): : 893 - 902
  • [4] Special considerations in virtual surgical planning for secondary accurate maxillary reconstruction with vascularized fibula osteomyocutaneous flap
    Sun, Jian
    Shen, Yi
    Li, Jun
    ORAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 49 : S18 - S18
  • [5] Maxillary reconstruction with a fibula osteoseptocutaneous free flap and simultaneous insertion of osseointegrated dental implants
    Chang, YM
    Coskunfirat, OK
    Wei, FC
    Tsai, CY
    Lin, HN
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2004, 113 (04) : 1140 - 1145
  • [6] Virtual Surgical Planning for Mandibular Reconstruction: Improving the Fibula Bone Flap
    Parras, Dolores
    Ramos, Benito
    Jose Haro, Juan
    Acosta, Manuel
    Cavas-Martinez, Francisco
    Canavate, Francisco J. F.
    Fernandez-Pacheco, Daniel G.
    BIOINFORMATICS AND BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, IWBBIO 2017, PT I, 2017, 10208 : 282 - 291
  • [7] Virtual surgical planning in fibula free flap reconstruction of head and neck defects: Advice to novice surgeons
    Al Deek, Nidal F.
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2019, 72 (12): : 2069 - 2070
  • [8] Primary insertion of osseointegrated dental implants into fibula osteoseptocutaneous free flap for mandible reconstruction
    Chang, YM
    Santamaria, E
    Wei, FC
    Chen, HC
    Chan, CP
    Shen, YF
    Hou, SP
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 1998, 102 (03) : 680 - 688
  • [9] A Comparative Study of Analog Preoperative Planning Versus Virtual Preoperative Planning for Mandibular Reconstruction With Fibula Free Flap
    Cedillo, Marco
    Cordova, Sofia
    Larralde, Sebastian
    Martinez, Fabian
    Sandoval, Fernando
    Suntaxi, Felipe
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2022, 33 (07) : E680 - E685
  • [10] Virtual Surgical Planning, Stereolitographic Models and CAD/CAM Titanium Mesh for Three-Dimensional Reconstruction of Fibula Flap with Iliac Crest Graft and Dental Implants
    Navarro Cuellar, Carlos
    Tousidonis Rial, Manuel
    Antunez-Conde, Raul
    Ochandiano Caicoya, Santiago
    Navarro Cuellar, Ignacio
    Arenas de Frutos, Gema
    Sada Urmeneta, Angela
    Garcia-Hidalgo Alonso, Maria Isabel
    Navarro Vila, Carlos
    Salmeron Escobar, Jose Ignacio
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (09)