Evaluation of the Abbott m2000rt RealTime™ HIV-1 assay with manual sample preparation compared with the ROCHE COBAS® AmpliPrep™/AMPLICOR™ HIV-1 MONITOR® v1.5 using specimens from East Africa

被引:31
|
作者
Crump, John A. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Scott, Lesley E. [5 ]
Msuya, Emma [3 ]
Morrissey, Anne B. [1 ]
Kimaro, Ekyafyose E. [3 ]
Shao, John F. [3 ,4 ]
Stevens, Wendy S. [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Med, Div Infect Dis & Int Health, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Duke Global Hlth Inst, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[3] Kilimanjaro Christian Med Ctr, Moshi, Tanzania
[4] Tumaini Univ, Kilimanjaro Christian Med Coll, Moshi, Tanzania
[5] Univ Witwatersrand, Dept Mol Med & Haematol, Sch Pathol, Fac Hlth Sci, ZA-2050 Wits, South Africa
[6] Natl Hlth Lab Serv, Johannesburg, South Africa
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
HIV; Reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction; Viral load; Validation studies; Tanzania; GENETICALLY DIVERSE PANEL; DRIED BLOOD SPOTS; VIRUS TYPE-1 RNA; QUANTITATIVE DETECTION; PERFORMANCE; NUCLISENS; PLASMA; TANZANIA; PCR; QUANTIFICATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jviromet.2009.08.013
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The performance of the Abbott m2000rt RealTime (TM) HIV-1 assay (RealTime HIV-1) with manual sample preparation was compared against the ROCHE COBAS (R) AmpliPrep (TM)/AMPLICOR (TM) HIV-1 MONITOR Test v0.5 (CAP/CA HIV-1) using samples collected from 100 donors infected with HIV and 20 donors not infected with HIV in northern Tanzania where HIV-1 subtypes A, C, D, and their recombinant forms predominate. The RealTime HIV-1 appeared to have more within-run variability at high HIV-1 RNA concentrations, but total assay variability over the dynamic range tested was within the manufacturer's claim of < 0.3 SD copies/mL Accuracy studies showed 100% concordance for positive and negative values. When continuous values were examined, CAP/CA HIV-1 yielded higher values than the RealTime HIV-1 at higher nominal HIV-1 RNA concentrations. The RealTime HIV-1 assay showed excellent linearity between 2.5 and 7.0 log copies/mL Of negative samples, 100% showed negative results, and > 95% of samples with nominal concentrations of 40 copies/mL were detected at >= 40 copies/mL by RealTime HIV-1. Manual sample preparation may contribute to higher total assay variability. This study suggests that the Abbott m2000rt RealTime HIV-1 assay with manual sample preparation is an acceptable and feasible alternative to the conventional ROCHE COBAS AmpliPrep/AMLICOR HIV-1 Monitor v1.5 assay and that the RealTime HIV-1 assay performs well on samples from East Africa. (c) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:218 / 222
页数:5
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [1] Comparative evaluation of the Abbott HIV-1 RealTime™ assay with the Standard Roche COBAS® Amplicor™ HIV-1 Monitor® Test, v1.5 for determining HIV-1 RNA levels in plasma specimens from Pune, India
    Khopkar, Priyanka
    Mallav, Vikas
    Chidrawar, Shweta
    Kulkarni, Smita
    JOURNAL OF VIROLOGICAL METHODS, 2013, 191 (01) : 82 - 87
  • [2] Evaluation of the Abbott m2000 RealTime Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 (HIV-1) Assay for HIV Load Monitoring in South Africa Compared to the Roche Cobas AmpliPrep-Cobas Amplicor, Roche Cobas AmpliPrep-Cobas TaqMan HIV-1, and BioMerieux NucliSENS EasyQ HIV-1 Assays
    Scott, Lesley E.
    Noble, Lara D.
    Moloi, Jackie
    Erasmus, Linda
    Venter, Willem D. F.
    Stevens, Wendy
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2009, 47 (07) : 2209 - 2217
  • [3] Evaluation of the Cobas AmpliPrep/Cobas Amplicor HIV-1 Monitor™ Ultrasensitive Test:: comparison with the Cobas Amplicor HIV-1 Monitor™ test (manual specimen preparation)
    Berger, A
    Scherzed, L
    Stürmer, M
    Preiser, W
    Doerr, HW
    Rabenau, HF
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL VIROLOGY, 2002, 25 : S103 - S107
  • [4] Comparison of the Abbott m2000 HIV-1 Real-Time and Roche AMPLICOR Monitor v1.5 HIV-1 assays on plasma specimens from Rakai, Uganda
    Ssebugenyi, I.
    Kizza, A.
    Mpoza, B.
    Aluma, G.
    Boaz, I.
    Newell, K.
    Laeyendecker, O.
    Shott, J. P.
    Serwadda, D.
    Reynolds, S. J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STD & AIDS, 2011, 22 (07) : 373 - 375
  • [5] Performance of the Automated COBAS AmpliPrep/COBAS TaqMan HIV-1 Test on a Genetically Diverse Panel of Specimens from China: Comparison to the COBAS Amplicor HIV-1 Monitor Test, v1.5
    Xu, Sihong
    Song, Aijing
    Li, Xiuhua
    Nie, Jianhui
    Zhang, Chuntao
    Wang, Youchun
    INTERVIROLOGY, 2010, 53 (04) : 221 - 228
  • [6] Evaluation of the Abbott Investigational Use Only RealTime HIV-1 Assay and Comparison to the Roche Amplicor HIV-1 Monitor Test, Version 1.5
    Pyne, Michael T.
    Konnick, Eric Q.
    Phansalkar, Amit
    Hillyard, David R.
    JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS, 2009, 11 (04): : 347 - 354
  • [7] Comparative evaluation of Roche's COBAS Ampliprep/COBAS TaqMan HIV-1 Test v2.0 and Abbott's RealTime m2000sp/rt HIV-1 assay on PPTs and EDTA samples
    Adachi, Dena
    Benedet, Marlin
    Tang, Julian W.
    Taylor, Geoffrey D.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL VIROLOGY, 2014, 60 (01) : 78 - 79
  • [8] Evaluation of performance across the dynamic range of the Abbott RealTime™ HIV-1 assay as compared to VERSANT HIV-1 RNA 3.0 and AMPLICOR HIV-1 MONITOR v1.5 using serial dilutions of 39 group M and O viruses
    Swanson, Priscilla
    Huang, Shihai
    Abravaya, Klara
    de Mendoza, Carmen
    Soriano, Vincent
    Devare, Sushil G.
    Hackett, John, Jr.
    JOURNAL OF VIROLOGICAL METHODS, 2007, 141 (01) : 49 - 57
  • [9] Performance of the Abbott RealTime HIV-1 assay versus the Roche Amplicor HIV-1 MonitorTM Test, v1.5, UltraSensitive assay for samples with low plasma HIV-1 RNA copy numbers
    Stephan, Christoph
    Hill, Andrew
    Hadacek, Maria Blanca
    van Delft, Yvonne
    Moecklinghoff, Christiane
    JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2014, 69 (06) : 1708 - 1710
  • [10] Comparative Evaluation of the Roche Cobas AmpliPrep/Cobas TaqMan HIV-1 Version 2 Test Using the TaqMan 48 Analyzer and the Abbott RealTime HIV-1 Assay
    van Rensburg, Estrelita Janse
    Tait, Karen
    Watt, Alistair
    Schall, Robert
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2011, 49 (01) : 377 - 379