A Practical, Automated Quality Assurance Method for Measuring Spatial Resolution in PET

被引:29
|
作者
Lodge, Martin A. [1 ]
Rahmim, Arman [1 ]
Wahl, Richard L. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Div Nucl Med, Russell H Morgan Dept Radiol & Radiol Sci, Baltimore, MD USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Sidney Kimmel Comprehens Canc Ctr Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD USA
关键词
spatial resolution; quality assurance; multicenter trials; PET; IMAGE-RECONSTRUCTION; EMISSION-TOMOGRAPHY; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.2967/jnumed.108.060079
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The use of different scanners, acquisition protocols, and reconstruction algorithms has been identified as a problem that limits the use of PET in multicenter trials. The aim of this project was to aid standardization of data collection by developing a quality assurance method for measuring the spatial resolution achieved with clinical imaging protocols. Methods: A commercially available 68Ge cylinder phantom (diameter, 20 cm) with a uniform activity concentration was positioned in the center of the PET field of view, and an image was acquired using typical clinical parameters. Spatial resolution was measured by artificially generating an object function (O) with uniform activity within a 20-cm-diameter cylinder, assuming no noise and perfect spatial resolution, centered on the original image (I); dividing F[I] by F[O], where F indicates a 2-dimensional Fourier transform, to produce a modulation transfer function; and taking the inverse Fourier transform of the modulation transfer function to produce a point-spread function in image space. The method was validated using data acquired on 4 different commercial PET systems. Results: Spatial resolution on the Discovery LS was measured at 5.75 +/- 0.58 mm, compared with 5.54 +/- 0.19 mm from separate point source measurements. Variability of the resolution measurements differed between scanners and protocols, but the typical SD was approximately 0.15 mm when iterative reconstruction was used. The potential for predicting resolution recovery coefficients for small objects was also demonstrated. Conclusion: The proposed method does not require elaborate phantom preparation and is practical to perform, and data analysis is fully automated. This approach is useful for evaluating clinical reconstruction protocols across varying scanners and reconstruction algorithms and should greatly aid standardization of data collection between centers.
引用
收藏
页码:1307 / 1314
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Measuring PET Spatial Resolution Using a Cylinder Phantom Positioned at an Oblique Angle
    Lodge, Martin A.
    Leal, Jeffrey P.
    Rahmim, Arman
    Sunderland, John J.
    Frey, Eric C.
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2018, 59 (11) : 1768 - 1775
  • [22] PRACTICAL QUALITY ASSURANCE FOR DIAGNOSTIC TELERADIOLOGY
    FREY, GD
    OLINGER, R
    SPICER, KM
    SCHENING, T
    CONWAY, WF
    YOUNG, JW
    RADIOLOGY, 1995, 197 : 449 - 449
  • [23] A PRACTICAL APPROACH TO QUALITY ASSURANCE IN CT
    JOHNSON, GA
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1982, 139 (02) : 427 - 427
  • [24] Quality assurance for MRI: practical experience
    Firbank, MJ
    Harrison, RM
    Williams, ED
    Coulthard, A
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2000, 73 (868): : 376 - 383
  • [25] QUALITY ASSURANCE IN NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND PET
    Pathmaraj, Kunthi
    Scott, Andrew
    INTERNAL MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2013, 43 : 40 - 40
  • [26] Automated quality assurance of continuous data
    Last, M
    Kandel, A
    SYSTEMATIC ORGANISATION OF INFORMATION IN FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2003, 184 : 89 - 104
  • [27] Automated quality assurance in mammographic Imaging
    Blot, L
    Zwiggelaar, R
    Hobulinka, M
    Davis, A
    IWDM 2000: 5TH INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY, 2001, : 641 - 647
  • [28] Quality assurance methodologies for automated driving
    Wotawa, F.
    Peischl, B.
    Kluck, F.
    Nica, M.
    ELEKTROTECHNIK UND INFORMATIONSTECHNIK, 2018, 135 (4-5): : 322 - 327
  • [29] AUTOMATED QUALITY ASSURANCE OF EDUCATIONAL TESTING
    Doneva, Rositsa
    Gaftandzhieva, Silvia
    Totkov, George
    TURKISH ONLINE JOURNAL OF DISTANCE EDUCATION, 2018, 19 (03): : 71 - 92
  • [30] Modular measuring stations for quality assurance
    Urbansky, Uwe
    Werkstatt und Betrieb, 1996, 129 (04):