A Practical, Automated Quality Assurance Method for Measuring Spatial Resolution in PET

被引:29
|
作者
Lodge, Martin A. [1 ]
Rahmim, Arman [1 ]
Wahl, Richard L. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Div Nucl Med, Russell H Morgan Dept Radiol & Radiol Sci, Baltimore, MD USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Sidney Kimmel Comprehens Canc Ctr Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD USA
关键词
spatial resolution; quality assurance; multicenter trials; PET; IMAGE-RECONSTRUCTION; EMISSION-TOMOGRAPHY; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.2967/jnumed.108.060079
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The use of different scanners, acquisition protocols, and reconstruction algorithms has been identified as a problem that limits the use of PET in multicenter trials. The aim of this project was to aid standardization of data collection by developing a quality assurance method for measuring the spatial resolution achieved with clinical imaging protocols. Methods: A commercially available 68Ge cylinder phantom (diameter, 20 cm) with a uniform activity concentration was positioned in the center of the PET field of view, and an image was acquired using typical clinical parameters. Spatial resolution was measured by artificially generating an object function (O) with uniform activity within a 20-cm-diameter cylinder, assuming no noise and perfect spatial resolution, centered on the original image (I); dividing F[I] by F[O], where F indicates a 2-dimensional Fourier transform, to produce a modulation transfer function; and taking the inverse Fourier transform of the modulation transfer function to produce a point-spread function in image space. The method was validated using data acquired on 4 different commercial PET systems. Results: Spatial resolution on the Discovery LS was measured at 5.75 +/- 0.58 mm, compared with 5.54 +/- 0.19 mm from separate point source measurements. Variability of the resolution measurements differed between scanners and protocols, but the typical SD was approximately 0.15 mm when iterative reconstruction was used. The potential for predicting resolution recovery coefficients for small objects was also demonstrated. Conclusion: The proposed method does not require elaborate phantom preparation and is practical to perform, and data analysis is fully automated. This approach is useful for evaluating clinical reconstruction protocols across varying scanners and reconstruction algorithms and should greatly aid standardization of data collection between centers.
引用
收藏
页码:1307 / 1314
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Patient-specific quantification of image quality: An automated method for measuring spatial resolution in clinical CT images
    Sanders, Jeremiah
    Hurwitz, Lynne
    Samei, Ehsan
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 43 (10) : 5330 - 5338
  • [2] A practical method for measuring planar spatial resolution with scatter on a CZT gamma camera
    Barrau, Corinne
    Tylski, Perrine
    EJNMMI PHYSICS, 2024, 11 (01):
  • [3] Evaluating spatial resolution for quality assurance of UAV images
    Lee, Jaeone
    Sung, Sangmin
    SPATIAL INFORMATION RESEARCH, 2016, 24 (02) : 141 - 154
  • [4] A Method for Estimating PET Spatial Resolution
    Chaal, J.
    Sjoholm, A. T.
    Conti, M.
    Townsend, D.
    2015 IEEE NUCLEAR SCIENCE SYMPOSIUM AND MEDICAL IMAGING CONFERENCE (NSS/MIC), 2015,
  • [5] Method of measuring the spatial resolution of a photoresist
    Hoffnagle, JA
    Hinsberg, WD
    Sanchez, MI
    Houle, FA
    OPTICS LETTERS, 2002, 27 (20) : 1776 - 1778
  • [6] A practical approach to measuring assurance
    Jelen, GF
    Williams, JR
    14TH ANNUAL COMPUTER SECURITY APPLICATIONS CONFERENCE, PROCEEDINGS, 1998, : 333 - 343
  • [7] PRACTICAL QUALITY ASSURANCE
    CONNELL, J
    BRICE, L
    DATAMATION, 1985, 31 (05): : 106 - &
  • [8] An Efficient and Practical MR Flow Quantification Quality Assurance Method
    Lin, C.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2015, 42 (06) : 3255 - 3255
  • [9] The new DIN EN 14181: Quality assurance of automated emission measuring systems
    Hummel, HJ
    Kordecki, R
    GEFAHRSTOFFE REINHALTUNG DER LUFT, 2004, 64 (10): : 449 - 455
  • [10] An Automated Method for the Verification and Quality Assurance of Treatment Planning Systems
    Oh, S.
    Lee, D.
    Leong, B.
    Wu, Y.
    Kim, S.
    Kim, T.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 44 (06) : 2939 - 2940