Subject-specific finite element models of long bones: An in vitro evaluation of the overall accuracy

被引:185
|
作者
Taddei, Fulvia [1 ]
Cristofolini, Luca
Martelli, Saulo
Gill, H. S.
Viceconti, Marco
机构
[1] Ist Ortoped Rizzoli, Lab Tecnol Med, Bologna, Italy
[2] Univ Bologna, Fac Engn, DIEM, Bologna, Italy
[3] Univ Oxford, Nuffield Dept Orthopaed Surg, OOEC, Oxford, England
关键词
finite element modelling; automatic mesh generation; computed tomography; experimental validation; human bones;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.07.018
中图分类号
Q6 [生物物理学];
学科分类号
071011 ;
摘要
The determination of the mechanical stresses induced in human bones is of great importance in both research and clinical practice. Since the stresses in bones cannot be measured non-invasively in vivo, the only way to estimate them is through subject-specific finite element modelling. Several methods exist for the automatic generation of these models from CT data, but before bringing them in the clinical practice it is necessary to assess their accuracy in the predictions of the bone stresses. Particular attention should be paid to those regions, like the epiphyseal and metaphyseal parts of long bones, where the automatic methods are typically less accurate. Aim of the present study was to implement a general procedure to automatically generate subject-specific finite element models of bones from CT data and estimate the accuracy of this general procedure by applying it to one real femur. This femur was tested in vitro under five different loading scenarios and the results of these tests were used to verify how the adoption of a simplified two-material homogeneous model would change the accuracy with respect to the density-based inhomogeneous one, with special attention paid to the epiphyseal and metaphyseal proximal regions of the bone. The results showed that the density-based inhomogeneous model predicts with a very good accuracy the measured stresses (R(2) = 0.91, RMSE = 8.6%, peak error = 27%), while the two-material model was less accurate (R(2) = 0.89, RMSE = 9.6%, peak error = 35%). The results showed that it is possible to automatically generate accurate finite element models of bones from CT data and that the strategy of material properties mapping has a significant influence on its accuracy. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2457 / 2467
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] An Image Registration-Based Morphing Technique for Generating Subject-Specific Brain Finite Element Models
    Giudice, J. Sebastian
    Alshareef, Ahmed
    Wu, Taotao
    Gancayco, Christina A.
    Reynier, Kristen A.
    Tustison, Nicholas J.
    Druzgal, T. Jason
    Panzer, Matthew B.
    ANNALS OF BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2020, 48 (10) : 2412 - 2424
  • [32] Development of a customized density-modulus relationship for use in subject-specific finite element models of the ulna
    Austman, R. L.
    Milner, J. S.
    Holdsworth, D. W.
    Dunning, C. E.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART H-JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE, 2009, 223 (H6) : 787 - 794
  • [33] Evaluation of a subject-specific finite-element model of the equine metacarpophalangeal joint under physiological load
    Harrison, Simon M.
    Whitton, R. Chris
    Kawcak, Chris E.
    Stover, Susan M.
    Pandy, Marcus G.
    JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 2014, 47 (01) : 65 - 73
  • [34] Subject-specific material properties of the heel pad: An inverse finite element analysis
    Isvilanonda, Vara
    Li, Ellen Y.
    Williams, Evan D.
    Cavanagh, Peter R.
    Haynor, David R.
    Chu, Baocheng
    Ledoux, William R.
    JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 2024, 165
  • [35] DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF A SUBJECT-SPECIFIC FINITE ELEMENT MODEL FOR SKULL FRACTURE ASSESSMENT
    Huang, James
    Raymond, David
    Shen, Weixin
    Stuhmiller, James
    Crawford, Gregory
    Bir, Cynthia
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME INTERNATIONAL MECHANICAL ENGINEERING CONGRESS AND EXPOSITION 2011, VOL 2, 2012, : 31 - +
  • [36] Subject-specific finite element model of the pelvis: Development, validation and sensitivity studies
    Anderson, AE
    Peters, CL
    Tuttle, BD
    Weiss, JA
    JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICAL ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2005, 127 (03): : 364 - 373
  • [37] Development and validation of two subject-specific finite element models of human head against three cadaveric experiments
    Tse, Kwong Ming
    Tan, Long Bin
    Lee, Shu Jin
    Lim, Siak Piang
    Lee, Heow Pueh
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUMERICAL METHODS IN BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2014, 30 (03) : 397 - 415
  • [38] Efficient development of subject-specific finite element knee models: Automated identification of soft-tissue attachments
    Malbouby, Vahid
    Gibbons, Kalin D.
    Bursa, Nurbanu
    Ivy, Amanda K.
    Fitzpatrick, Clare K.
    JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 2025, 178
  • [39] Prediction of the structural response of the femoral shaft under dynamic loading using subject-specific finite element models
    Park, Gwansik
    Kim, Taewung
    Forman, Jason
    Panzer, Matthew B.
    Crandall, Jeff R.
    COMPUTER METHODS IN BIOMECHANICS AND BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2017, 20 (11) : 1151 - 1166
  • [40] An accurate estimation of bone density improves the accuracy of subject-specific finite element (vol 41, pg 2483, 2008)
    Schileo, Enrico
    Dall'Ara, Enrico
    Taddei, Fulvia
    Malandrino, Andrea
    Schotkamp, Tom
    Baleani, Massimiliano
    Viceconti, Marco
    JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 2008, 41 (15) : 3294 - 3294