Determining PM2.5 calibration curves for a low-cost particle monitor: common indoor residential aerosols

被引:0
|
作者
Dacunto, Philip J. [1 ,2 ]
Klepeis, Neil E. [1 ,3 ]
Cheng, Kai-Chung [1 ]
Acevedo-Bolton, Viviana [1 ]
Jiang, Ruo-Ting [1 ]
Repace, James L. [4 ]
Ott, Wayne R. [1 ]
Hildemann, Lynn M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] US Mil Acad, Dept Geog & Environm Engn, West Point, NY 10996 USA
[3] San Diego State Univ Res Fdn, Grad Sch Publ Hlth, Ctr Behav Epidemiol & Community Hlth CBEACH, San Diego, CA 92123 USA
[4] Repace Associates, Bowie, MD 20720 USA
关键词
OUTDOOR;
D O I
10.1039/c5em00365b
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Real-time particle monitors are essential for accurately estimating exposure to fine particles indoors. However, many such monitors tend to be prohibitively expensive for some applications, such as a tenant or homeowner curious about the quality of the air in their home. A lower cost version (the Dylos Air Quality Monitor) has recently been introduced, but it requires appropriate calibration to reflect the mass concentration units required for exposure assessment. We conducted a total of 64 experiments with a suite of instruments including a Dylos DC1100, another real-time laser photometer (TSI SidePak T Model AM-510 Personal Aerosol Monitor), and a gravimetric sampling apparatus to estimate Dylos calibration factors for emissions from 17 different common indoor sources including cigarettes, incense, fried bacon, chicken, and hamburger. Comparison of minute-by-minute data from the Dylos with the gravimetrically calibrated SidePak yielded relationships that enable the conversion of the raw Dylos particle counts less than 2.5 mm (in #/0.01 ft(3)) to estimated PM2.5 mass concentration (e.g. mg m(-3)). The relationship between the exponentially-decaying Dylos particle counts and PM2.5 mass concentration can be described by a theoretically-derived power law with source-specific empirical parameters. A linear relationship (calibration factor) is applicable to fresh or quickly decaying emissions (i.e., before the aerosol has aged and differential decay rates introduce curvature into the relationship). The empirical parameters for the power-law relationships vary greatly both between and within source types, although linear factors appear to have lower uncertainty. The Dylos Air Quality Monitor is likely most useful for providing instantaneous feedback and context on mass particle levels in home and work situations for field-survey or personal awareness applications.
引用
收藏
页码:1959 / 1966
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Inter- versus Intracity Variations in the Performance and Calibration of Low-Cost PM2.5 Sensors: A Multicity Assessment in India
    Sreekanth, V
    Bhargav, R. Ajay
    Kulkarni, Padmavati
    Puttaswamy, Naveen
    Prabhu, Vignesh
    Agrawal, Pratyush
    Upadhya, Adithi R.
    Rao, Sofiya
    Sutaria, Ronak
    Mor, Suman
    Dey, Sagnik
    Khaiwal, Ravindra
    Balakrishnan, Kalpana
    Tripathi, Sachchida Nand
    Singh, Pratima
    ACS EARTH AND SPACE CHEMISTRY, 2022, 6 (12): : 3007 - 3016
  • [42] Band-Sensitive Calibration of Low-Cost PM2.5 Sensors by LSTM Model with Dynamically Weighted Loss Function
    Ryu, Jewan
    Park, Heekyung
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (10)
  • [43] Characterizing indoor-outdoor PM 2.5 concentrations using low-cost sensor measurements in residential homes in Dhaka, Bangladesh
    Saha, Provat K.
    Habib, Ahsan
    Prapti, Dipika R.
    Jubair, Talha
    Zarrah, Abu U.
    Hossain, Chowdhury A.
    Rahman, Sheikh M.
    Salam, Abdus
    Bari, Md Aynul
    Marshall, Julian D.
    ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2025, 342
  • [44] Development of Low-Cost Air Quality Stations for Next Generation Monitoring Networks: Calibration and Validation of PM2.5 and PM10 Sensors
    Cavaliere, Alice
    Carotenuto, Federico
    Di Gennaro, Filippo
    Gioli, Beniamino
    Gualtieri, Giovanni
    Martelli, Francesca
    Matese, Alessandro
    Toscano, Piero
    Vagnoli, Carolina
    Zaldei, Alessandro
    SENSORS, 2018, 18 (09)
  • [45] Assessing low-cost sensor for characterizing temporal variation of PM2.5 in Bandung, Indonesia
    Kurniawati, Syukria
    Santoso, Muhayatun
    Nurhaini, Feni Fernita
    Atmodjo, Djoko Prakoso D.
    Lestiani, Diah Dwiana
    Ramadhani, Moch Faizal
    Kusmartini, Indah
    Syahfitri, Woro Yatu N.
    Damastuti, Endah
    Tursinah, Rasito
    KUWAIT JOURNAL OF SCIENCE, 2025, 52 (01)
  • [46] An Accurate and Low-cost PM2.5 Estimation Method Based on Artificial Neural Network
    Xia, Lixue
    Luo, Rong
    Zhao, Bin
    Wang, Yu
    Yang, Huazhong
    2015 20TH ASIA AND SOUTH PACIFIC DESIGN AUTOMATION CONFERENCE (ASP-DAC), 2015, : 190 - 195
  • [47] Seasonal Changes in Urban PM2.5 Hotspots and Sources from Low-Cost Sensors
    Harr, Lorenz
    Sinsel, Tim
    Simon, Helge
    Esper, Jan
    ATMOSPHERE, 2022, 13 (05)
  • [48] On the distribution of low-cost PM2.5 sensors in the US: demographic and air quality associations
    deSouza, Priyanka
    Kinney, Patrick L.
    JOURNAL OF EXPOSURE SCIENCE AND ENVIRONMENTAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2021, 31 (03) : 514 - 524
  • [49] Research Priorities of Applying Low-Cost PM2.5 Sensors in Southeast Asian Countries
    Lung, Shih-Chun Candice
    Thi Hien, To
    Cambaliza, Maria Obiminda L.
    Hlaing, Ohnmar May Tin
    Oanh, Nguyen Thi Kim
    Latif, Mohd Talib
    Lestari, Puji
    Salam, Abdus
    Lee, Shih-Yu
    Wang, Wen-Cheng Vincent
    Tsou, Ming-Chien Mark
    Cong-Thanh, Tran
    Cruz, Melliza Templonuevo
    Tantrakarnapa, Kraichat
    Othman, Murnira
    Roy, Shatabdi
    Dang, Tran Ngoc
    Agustian, Dwi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (03)
  • [50] Exposure to PM2.5 on Public Transport: Guidance for Field Measurements with Low-Cost Sensors
    Fameli, Kyriaki-Maria
    Moustris, Konstantinos
    Spyropoulos, Georgios
    Rodanas, Dimitrios-Michael
    ATMOSPHERE, 2024, 15 (03)