Determining PM2.5 calibration curves for a low-cost particle monitor: common indoor residential aerosols

被引:0
|
作者
Dacunto, Philip J. [1 ,2 ]
Klepeis, Neil E. [1 ,3 ]
Cheng, Kai-Chung [1 ]
Acevedo-Bolton, Viviana [1 ]
Jiang, Ruo-Ting [1 ]
Repace, James L. [4 ]
Ott, Wayne R. [1 ]
Hildemann, Lynn M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] US Mil Acad, Dept Geog & Environm Engn, West Point, NY 10996 USA
[3] San Diego State Univ Res Fdn, Grad Sch Publ Hlth, Ctr Behav Epidemiol & Community Hlth CBEACH, San Diego, CA 92123 USA
[4] Repace Associates, Bowie, MD 20720 USA
关键词
OUTDOOR;
D O I
10.1039/c5em00365b
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Real-time particle monitors are essential for accurately estimating exposure to fine particles indoors. However, many such monitors tend to be prohibitively expensive for some applications, such as a tenant or homeowner curious about the quality of the air in their home. A lower cost version (the Dylos Air Quality Monitor) has recently been introduced, but it requires appropriate calibration to reflect the mass concentration units required for exposure assessment. We conducted a total of 64 experiments with a suite of instruments including a Dylos DC1100, another real-time laser photometer (TSI SidePak T Model AM-510 Personal Aerosol Monitor), and a gravimetric sampling apparatus to estimate Dylos calibration factors for emissions from 17 different common indoor sources including cigarettes, incense, fried bacon, chicken, and hamburger. Comparison of minute-by-minute data from the Dylos with the gravimetrically calibrated SidePak yielded relationships that enable the conversion of the raw Dylos particle counts less than 2.5 mm (in #/0.01 ft(3)) to estimated PM2.5 mass concentration (e.g. mg m(-3)). The relationship between the exponentially-decaying Dylos particle counts and PM2.5 mass concentration can be described by a theoretically-derived power law with source-specific empirical parameters. A linear relationship (calibration factor) is applicable to fresh or quickly decaying emissions (i.e., before the aerosol has aged and differential decay rates introduce curvature into the relationship). The empirical parameters for the power-law relationships vary greatly both between and within source types, although linear factors appear to have lower uncertainty. The Dylos Air Quality Monitor is likely most useful for providing instantaneous feedback and context on mass particle levels in home and work situations for field-survey or personal awareness applications.
引用
收藏
页码:1959 / 1966
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Ensemble learning of model hyperparameters and spatiotemporal data for calibration of low-cost PM2.5 sensors
    Yin, Peng-Yeng
    Tsai, Chih-Chun
    Day, Rong-Fuh
    Tung, Ching-Ying
    Bhanu, Bir
    MATHEMATICAL BIOSCIENCES AND ENGINEERING, 2019, 16 (06) : 6858 - 6873
  • [22] Calibration of low-cost PurpleAir outdoor monitors using an improved method of calculating PM2.5
    Wallace, Lance
    Bi, Jianzhao
    Ott, Wayne R.
    Sarnat, Jeremy
    Liu, Yang
    ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 256
  • [23] Evaluating Indoor Air Quality in Residential Environments: A Study of PM2.5 and CO2 Dynamics Using Low-Cost Sensors
    Shah, Kabir Bahadur
    Kim, Dylan
    Pinakana, Sai Deepak
    Hobosyan, Mkhitar
    Montes, Armando
    Raysoni, Amit U.
    ENVIRONMENTS, 2024, 11 (11)
  • [24] Evaluation of Low-Cost Sensors for Ambient PM2.5 Monitoring
    Badura, Marek
    Batog, Piotr
    Drzeniecka-Osiadacz, Anetta
    Modzel, Piotr
    JOURNAL OF SENSORS, 2018, 2018
  • [25] Feasibility of Using Low-Cost Sensors to Monitor Personal Exposure to PM2.5 Among People with Asthma
    Xie, S.
    Meeker, J.
    Perez, L.
    Eriksen, W.
    Bocage, C.
    Ndicu, G.
    Localio, A.
    Park, H.
    Jen, A.
    Goldstein, M.
    Christie, C.
    Greenblatt, R.
    Barg, F.
    Apter, A. J.
    Himes, B. E.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2020, 201
  • [26] Analysis of spatiotemporal PM2.5 concentration patterns in Changwon, Korea, using low-cost PM2.5 sensors
    Song, Bonggeun
    Park, Kyunghun
    Kim, Taehyeung
    Seo, Gyeongho
    URBAN CLIMATE, 2022, 46
  • [27] Seasonal Field Calibration of Low-Cost PM2.5 Sensors in Different Locations with Different Sources in Thailand
    Dejchanchaiwong, Racha
    Tekasakul, Perapong
    Saejio, Apichat
    Limna, Thanathip
    Le, Thi-Cuc
    Tsai, Chuen-Jinn
    Lin, Guan-Yu
    Morris, John
    ATMOSPHERE, 2023, 14 (03)
  • [28] Low-cost PM2.5 Sensors: An Assessment of their Suitability for Various Applications
    Jayaratne, Rohan
    Liu, Xiaoting
    Ahn, Kang-Ho
    Asumadu-Sakyi, Akwasi
    Fisher, Gavin
    Gao, Jian
    Mabon, Adrian
    Mazaheri, Mandana
    Mullins, Benjamin
    Nyaku, Mawutorli
    Ristovski, Zoran
    Scorgie, Yvonne
    Phong Thai
    Dunbabin, Matthew
    Morawska, Lidia
    AEROSOL AND AIR QUALITY RESEARCH, 2020, 20 (03) : 520 - 532
  • [29] Design and evaluation of a portable PM2.5 monitor featuring a low-cost sensor in line with an active filter sampler
    Tryner, Jessica
    Quinn, Casey
    Windom, Bret C.
    Volckens, John
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE-PROCESSES & IMPACTS, 2019, 21 (08) : 1403 - 1415
  • [30] Evaluating the Performance of Low-Cost PM2.5 Sensors in Mobile Settings
    deSouza, Priyanka
    Wang, An
    Machida, Yuki
    Duhl, Tiffany
    Mora, Simone
    Kumar, Prashant
    Kahn, Ralph
    Ratti, Carlo
    Durant, John L.
    Hudda, Neelakshi
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 57 (41) : 15401 - 15411