The cellularity yield of three different 22-gauge endoscopic ultrasound fine needle aspiration needles

被引:14
|
作者
Othman, Mohamed O. [1 ]
Abdelfatah, Mohamed M. [2 ]
Padilla, Osvaldo [3 ]
Hussinat, Maha [1 ]
Elhanafi, Sherif [4 ]
Eloliby, Mohamed [4 ]
Torabi, Alireza [4 ]
Hakim, Nawar [4 ]
Boman, Darius A. [4 ]
机构
[1] Baylor Coll Med, Gastroenterol & Hepatol Sect, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] East Carolina Univ, Div Gastroenterol, Dept Internal Med, Greenville, NC USA
[3] Texas Tech Univ, Hlth Sci Ctr, Paul L Foster Sch Med, Dept Pathol, El Paso, TX USA
[4] Texas Tech Univ, Hlth Sci Ctr, Div Gastroenterol, Dept Internal Med,Paul L Foster Sch Med, El Paso, TX USA
关键词
endoscopic ultrasound; fine needle aspiration; 22; gauge; endoscopy; pancreatic adenocarcinoma; lymphadenopathy; SOLID PANCREATIC NEOPLASMS; SINGLE-CENTER EXPERIENCE; EUS-GUIDED FNA; BIOPSY; DIAGNOSIS; MASSES; CYTOLOGY;
D O I
10.1002/dc.23689
中图分类号
R446 [实验室诊断]; R-33 [实验医学、医学实验];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
BackgroundEndoscopic ultrasound (EUS) fine needle aspiration (FNA) is an integral part in the diagnosis of pancreatic, intestinal and extra-intestinal masses or lesions. There is no clear data on the superiority of the core biopsy needle over standard 22-gauge needles. The aim of this study is to prospectively compare the cellularity yield of three commonly used 22-gauge FNA needles available in the US market. Methods: This is a prospective, randomized study comparing the cellularity yield of three commercially available EUS needles (two standard FNA needles and core biopsy needle). Two blinded pathologists evaluated the cytology specimens based on an already agreed upon cytology score. We included adult patients (18-80 years old) who presented to our endoscopy unit for FNA of pancreatic or extrapancreatic masses. Results109 patients (57 F, 52 M) were recruited to the study, 88 lesions were pancreatic lesions. 39 patients were recruited in the EZ Shot 2 group, 36 in the Procore((R)) group and 34 in the Expect group. The average cellularity score and the mean number of passes (SD) were not different between the three needles; P=0.91 and P=0.16, respectively. There was no difference between the three needles in obtaining an onsite diagnosis (P=0.627) and no difference in reported adverse events between the three groups. ConclusionThe cellularity yields, the mean number of passes and reported adverse events were similar in the three compared 22-gauge needles. Diagn. Cytopathol. 2017;45:426-432. (c) 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:426 / 432
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] COMPARISON OF 21 GAUGE AND 22-GAUGE ASPIRATION NEEDLE DURING ENDOBRONCHIAL ULTRASOUND-GUIDED TRANSBRONCHIAL NEEDLE ASPIRATION: A RANDOMISED TRIAL
    Grah, Christian
    Griff, Sergej
    Mairinger, Thomas
    Bollmann, Lutz
    Temme, Hilke
    Seiberth, Rose
    Vogelbusch, Mirijam
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2011, 6 (06) : S1148 - S1148
  • [42] The comparative study of endoscopic EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration using 22-gauge and 25-gauge aspiration needle for solid pancreatic or peripancreatic masses
    Jeong, Seung Uk
    Lee, Sang Soo
    Lee, Byung Uk
    Park, Do Hyun
    Seo, Dong-Wan
    Lee, Sung Koo
    Kim, Myung-Hwan
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2012, 27 : 123 - 123
  • [43] Increasing the yield of endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration
    Byfield, FC
    Stevens, PD
    Lightdale, CJ
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1999, 49 (04) : AB152 - AB152
  • [44] Comparison of 19-and 22-gauge needles in EUS-guided fine needle aspiration in patients with mediastinal masses and lymph nodes
    Songur, Necla
    Songur, Yildiran
    Bircan, Sema
    Kapucuoglu, Nilgun
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2011, 22 (05): : 472 - 478
  • [45] Randomized Study of 21-gauge Versus 22-gauge Endobronchial Ultrasound-guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration Needles for Sampling Histology Specimens
    Oki, Masahide
    Saka, Hideo
    Kitagawa, Chiyoe
    Kogure, Yoshihito
    Murata, Naohiko
    Ichihara, Shu
    Moritani, Suzuko
    Ando, Masahiko
    JOURNAL OF BRONCHOLOGY & INTERVENTIONAL PULMONOLOGY, 2011, 18 (04) : 306 - 310
  • [46] ENDOSCOPIC ULTRASOUND GUIDED FINE-NEEDLE BIOPSY OF SMALL SOLID PANCREATIC LESIONS USING A 22-GAUGE NEEDLE WITH SIDE FENESTRATION
    Fabbri, C.
    Luigiano, C.
    Maimone, A.
    Tarantino, I.
    Baccarini, P.
    Fornelli, A.
    Liotta, R.
    Polifemo, A. M.
    Barresi, L.
    Traina, M.
    Virgilio, C.
    Cennamo, V.
    DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE, 2014, 46 : S62 - S62
  • [47] Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Liver Biopsy: Comparing the Diagnostic Yield and Safety Between the 19-Gauge and 22-Gauge Needle
    Sampath, Kartik
    Gordon, Stuart R.
    Toor, Arifa
    Dinani, Amreen
    Dickson, Rolland C.
    Suriawinata, Arief
    Gardner, Timothy B.
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2017, 85 (05) : AB479 - AB479
  • [48] Diagnostic Yield and Safety of the 19-Gauge versus 22-Gauge Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration Needle in Subjects with Sarcoidosis (GUESS)
    Dhooria, Sahajal
    Sehgal, Inderpaul Singh
    Prasad, Kuruswamy Thurai
    Muthu, Valliappan
    Dogra, Pooja
    Saini, Mandeep
    Gupta, Nalini
    Bal, Amanjit
    Aggarwal, Ashutosh Nath
    Agarwal, Ritesh
    RESPIRATION, 2024, 103 (06) : 336 - 343
  • [49] BONE-MARROW ASPIRATION WITH A 22-GAUGE SPINAL NEEDLE
    URBAN, C
    MUTZ, I
    KAULFERSCH, W
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 1982, 101 (06): : 1036 - 1037
  • [50] The 22-gauge core needle is not optimal for endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy
    Mok, Shaffer R. S.
    Diehl, David L.
    Confer, Bradley D.
    Johal, Amitpal S.
    Khara, Harshit S.
    ENDOSCOPY, 2020, 52 (02) : 157 - 157