The cellularity yield of three different 22-gauge endoscopic ultrasound fine needle aspiration needles

被引:14
|
作者
Othman, Mohamed O. [1 ]
Abdelfatah, Mohamed M. [2 ]
Padilla, Osvaldo [3 ]
Hussinat, Maha [1 ]
Elhanafi, Sherif [4 ]
Eloliby, Mohamed [4 ]
Torabi, Alireza [4 ]
Hakim, Nawar [4 ]
Boman, Darius A. [4 ]
机构
[1] Baylor Coll Med, Gastroenterol & Hepatol Sect, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] East Carolina Univ, Div Gastroenterol, Dept Internal Med, Greenville, NC USA
[3] Texas Tech Univ, Hlth Sci Ctr, Paul L Foster Sch Med, Dept Pathol, El Paso, TX USA
[4] Texas Tech Univ, Hlth Sci Ctr, Div Gastroenterol, Dept Internal Med,Paul L Foster Sch Med, El Paso, TX USA
关键词
endoscopic ultrasound; fine needle aspiration; 22; gauge; endoscopy; pancreatic adenocarcinoma; lymphadenopathy; SOLID PANCREATIC NEOPLASMS; SINGLE-CENTER EXPERIENCE; EUS-GUIDED FNA; BIOPSY; DIAGNOSIS; MASSES; CYTOLOGY;
D O I
10.1002/dc.23689
中图分类号
R446 [实验室诊断]; R-33 [实验医学、医学实验];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
BackgroundEndoscopic ultrasound (EUS) fine needle aspiration (FNA) is an integral part in the diagnosis of pancreatic, intestinal and extra-intestinal masses or lesions. There is no clear data on the superiority of the core biopsy needle over standard 22-gauge needles. The aim of this study is to prospectively compare the cellularity yield of three commonly used 22-gauge FNA needles available in the US market. Methods: This is a prospective, randomized study comparing the cellularity yield of three commercially available EUS needles (two standard FNA needles and core biopsy needle). Two blinded pathologists evaluated the cytology specimens based on an already agreed upon cytology score. We included adult patients (18-80 years old) who presented to our endoscopy unit for FNA of pancreatic or extrapancreatic masses. Results109 patients (57 F, 52 M) were recruited to the study, 88 lesions were pancreatic lesions. 39 patients were recruited in the EZ Shot 2 group, 36 in the Procore((R)) group and 34 in the Expect group. The average cellularity score and the mean number of passes (SD) were not different between the three needles; P=0.91 and P=0.16, respectively. There was no difference between the three needles in obtaining an onsite diagnosis (P=0.627) and no difference in reported adverse events between the three groups. ConclusionThe cellularity yields, the mean number of passes and reported adverse events were similar in the three compared 22-gauge needles. Diagn. Cytopathol. 2017;45:426-432. (c) 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:426 / 432
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: 22-gauge aspiration versus 25-gauge biopsy needles
    Min Jae Yang
    Hyunee Yim
    Jae Chul Hwang
    Dakeun Lee
    Young Bae Kim
    Sun Gyo Lim
    Soon Sun Kim
    Joon Koo Kang
    Byung Moo Yoo
    Jin Hong Kim
    BMC Gastroenterology, 15
  • [32] Comparison of 21-gauge and 22-gauge aspiration needle during endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration
    Nakajima, Takahiro
    Yasufuku, Kazuhiro
    Takahashi, Ryo
    Shingyoji, Masato
    Hirata, Tetsushi
    Itami, Makiko
    Matsui, Yukiko
    Itakura, Meiji
    Iizasa, Toshihiko
    Kimura, Hideki
    RESPIROLOGY, 2011, 16 (01) : 90 - 94
  • [33] Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy of Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS)-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration (FNA) Using 22-gauge and 25-gauge Needles for Pancreatic Masses
    Tian, Guo
    Bao, Haiwei
    Li, Ju
    Jiang, Tian'an
    MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR, 2018, 24 : 8333 - 8341
  • [34] Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of pancreatic lesions with 22 versus 25 Gauge needles: A meta-analysis
    Facciorusso, Antonio
    Stasi, Elisa
    Di Maso, Marianna
    Serviddio, Gaetano
    Ali Hussein, Mohammed Salah
    Muscatiello, Nicola
    UNITED EUROPEAN GASTROENTEROLOGY JOURNAL, 2017, 5 (06) : 846 - 853
  • [35] Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration by using 22-and 25-gauge needles alternatively: an observational study
    Iqbal, Shahzad
    Eldarway, Wael
    Mir, Rabia
    Cerulli, Maurice
    Sohn, Won
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2008, 103 : S482 - S482
  • [36] Feasibility of endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy using a 22-gauge needle
    Takahashi, Koji
    Ohyama, Hiroshi
    Ouchi, Mayu
    Kan, Motoyasu
    Nagashima, Hiroki
    Iino, Yotaro
    Kusakabe, Yuko
    Okitsu, Kohichiroh
    Ohno, Izumi
    Takiguchi, Yuichi
    Kato, Naoya
    MEDICINE, 2022, 101 (44) : E31545
  • [37] Comparison of the 22-gauge Aspiration and 22-gauge Biopsy Needles for EUS-guided Sampling of Subepithelial Lesions
    El Chafic, Abdul Hamid
    Loren, David
    Mounzer, Rawad
    Siddiqui, Ali
    Kowalski, Omas
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2016, 111 : S493 - S494
  • [38] Comparison of 22-gauge aspiration needles for histologic sampling during endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA)
    Izumo, Takehiro
    Sasada, Shinji
    Watanabe, Junko
    Chavez, Christine
    Matsumoto, Yuji
    Tsuchida, Takaaki
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2014, 44
  • [39] Comparison of 21-gauge and 22-gauge Needles for Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration of Mediastinal and Hilar Lymph Nodes
    Saji, Junko
    Kurimoto, Noriaki
    Morita, Katsuhiko
    Nakamura, Miho
    Inoue, Takeo
    Nakamura, Haruhiko
    Miyazawa, Teruomi
    JOURNAL OF BRONCHOLOGY & INTERVENTIONAL PULMONOLOGY, 2011, 18 (03) : 239 - 246
  • [40] Comparison of 22-gauge and 19-gauge needles in endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) transbronchlall needle aspiration (TBNA) in mediastinum lymph node assessment
    Shiu, Kelvin K.
    Eberhardt, Ralf
    Herth, Felix J.
    CHEST, 2007, 132 (04) : 465S - 465S