The cellularity yield of three different 22-gauge endoscopic ultrasound fine needle aspiration needles

被引:14
|
作者
Othman, Mohamed O. [1 ]
Abdelfatah, Mohamed M. [2 ]
Padilla, Osvaldo [3 ]
Hussinat, Maha [1 ]
Elhanafi, Sherif [4 ]
Eloliby, Mohamed [4 ]
Torabi, Alireza [4 ]
Hakim, Nawar [4 ]
Boman, Darius A. [4 ]
机构
[1] Baylor Coll Med, Gastroenterol & Hepatol Sect, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] East Carolina Univ, Div Gastroenterol, Dept Internal Med, Greenville, NC USA
[3] Texas Tech Univ, Hlth Sci Ctr, Paul L Foster Sch Med, Dept Pathol, El Paso, TX USA
[4] Texas Tech Univ, Hlth Sci Ctr, Div Gastroenterol, Dept Internal Med,Paul L Foster Sch Med, El Paso, TX USA
关键词
endoscopic ultrasound; fine needle aspiration; 22; gauge; endoscopy; pancreatic adenocarcinoma; lymphadenopathy; SOLID PANCREATIC NEOPLASMS; SINGLE-CENTER EXPERIENCE; EUS-GUIDED FNA; BIOPSY; DIAGNOSIS; MASSES; CYTOLOGY;
D O I
10.1002/dc.23689
中图分类号
R446 [实验室诊断]; R-33 [实验医学、医学实验];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
BackgroundEndoscopic ultrasound (EUS) fine needle aspiration (FNA) is an integral part in the diagnosis of pancreatic, intestinal and extra-intestinal masses or lesions. There is no clear data on the superiority of the core biopsy needle over standard 22-gauge needles. The aim of this study is to prospectively compare the cellularity yield of three commonly used 22-gauge FNA needles available in the US market. Methods: This is a prospective, randomized study comparing the cellularity yield of three commercially available EUS needles (two standard FNA needles and core biopsy needle). Two blinded pathologists evaluated the cytology specimens based on an already agreed upon cytology score. We included adult patients (18-80 years old) who presented to our endoscopy unit for FNA of pancreatic or extrapancreatic masses. Results109 patients (57 F, 52 M) were recruited to the study, 88 lesions were pancreatic lesions. 39 patients were recruited in the EZ Shot 2 group, 36 in the Procore((R)) group and 34 in the Expect group. The average cellularity score and the mean number of passes (SD) were not different between the three needles; P=0.91 and P=0.16, respectively. There was no difference between the three needles in obtaining an onsite diagnosis (P=0.627) and no difference in reported adverse events between the three groups. ConclusionThe cellularity yields, the mean number of passes and reported adverse events were similar in the three compared 22-gauge needles. Diagn. Cytopathol. 2017;45:426-432. (c) 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:426 / 432
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Endobronchial Ultrasound Transbronchial Needle Aspiration With a 19-Gauge Needle vs 21-and 22-Gauge Needles for Mediastinal Lymphadenopathy
    Romatowski, Nicholas P. J.
    Gillson, Ashley-Mae
    Stollery, Daniel
    Dumoulin, Elaine
    Vakil, Erik
    Dhaliwal, Inderdeep
    MacEachern, Paul
    Hergott, Christopher A.
    Tyan, Chung Chun
    Mitchell, Michael
    Schieman, Colin
    Fortin, Marc
    Tremblay, Alain
    CHEST, 2022, 162 (03) : 712 - 720
  • [22] Comparison of 22-gauge aspiration needle with 22-gauge biopsy needle in endoscopic ultrasonography-guided subepithelial tumor sampling
    Kim, Gwang Ha
    Cho, Yu Kyung
    Kim, Eun Young
    Kim, Hyung Kil
    Cho, Jin Woong
    Lee, Tae Hee
    Moon, Jeong Seop
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2014, 49 (03) : 347 - 354
  • [23] Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound guided 22-gauge core needle with standard 25-gauge fine-needle aspiration for diagnosing solid pancreatic lesions
    Berzosa, Manuel
    Villa, Nicolas
    El-Serag, Hasheme B.
    Sejpal, Divyesh V.
    Patel, Kalpesh K.
    ENDOSCOPIC ULTRASOUND, 2015, 4 (01) : 28 - 33
  • [24] Comparison of tissue quantity and diagnostic yield between two core biopsy needles for endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition: A 22-gauge reverse bevel needle versus 22-gauge Franseen needle
    Naidu, J.
    Phan, V-A
    Zobel, J.
    Safaeian, R.
    Ruszkiewicz, A.
    Otto, S.
    Tam, W.
    Nguyen, N. Q.
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2021, 36 : 10 - 10
  • [25] Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy using 22-gauge needle in diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis
    Imai, Kenichiro
    Matsubayashi, Hiroyuki
    Fukutomi, Akira
    Uesaka, Katsuhiko
    Sasaki, Keiko
    Ono, Hiroyuki
    DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE, 2011, 43 (11) : 869 - 874
  • [26] Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration using 22-and 25-gauge needles alternately
    Iqbal, S.
    Mir, R. N.
    Sohn, W.
    ENDOSCOPY, 2009, 41 : E87 - E87
  • [27] Benefit of high negative pressure during endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration with standard 22-gauge needles for pancreatic lesions: a retrospective comparative study
    Sato, Junya
    Ishiwatari, Hirotoshi
    Sasaki, Keiko
    Fujie, Shinya
    Kaneko, Junichi
    Satoh, Tatsunori
    Matsubayashi, Hiroyuki
    Kishida, Yoshihiro
    Yoshida, Masao
    Ito, Sayo
    Kawata, Noboru
    Imai, Kenichiro
    Kakushima, Naomi
    Takizawa, Kohei
    Hotta, Kinichi
    Ono, Hiroyuki
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2019, 54 (01) : 108 - 113
  • [28] A Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing the 22-Gauge Needle With and Without a Side Port for Endoscopic Ultrasound Fine Needle Aspiration of Solid Pancreatic Mass Lesions
    Ishiwatari, Hirotoshi
    Hayashi, Tsuyoshi
    Kawakami, Hiroshi
    Isayama, Hiroyuki
    Itoi, Takao
    Hisai, Hiroyuki
    Ono, Michihiro
    Abe, Yoko
    Yamamoto, Natsuyo
    Itokawa, Fumihide
    Hasegawa, Tadashi
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2015, 81 (05) : AB201 - AB201
  • [29] Endoscopic Ultrasoundsonography-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsy Using 22-Gauge Needles Is Effective for Exclusion of Pancreatic Malignancy in Cases of Autoimmune Pancreatitis
    Imai, K.
    Matsubayashi, H.
    Ono, H.
    Uesaka, K.
    Sasaki, K.
    PANCREAS, 2009, 38 (08) : 1006 - 1006
  • [30] Endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: 22-gauge aspiration versus 25-gauge biopsy needles
    Yang, Min Jae
    Yim, Hyunee
    Hwang, Jae Chul
    Lee, Dakeun
    Kim, Young Bae
    Lim, Sun Gyo
    Kim, Soon Sun
    Kang, Joon Koo
    Yoo, Byung Moo
    Kim, Jin Hong
    BMC GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2015, 15