The cellularity yield of three different 22-gauge endoscopic ultrasound fine needle aspiration needles

被引:14
|
作者
Othman, Mohamed O. [1 ]
Abdelfatah, Mohamed M. [2 ]
Padilla, Osvaldo [3 ]
Hussinat, Maha [1 ]
Elhanafi, Sherif [4 ]
Eloliby, Mohamed [4 ]
Torabi, Alireza [4 ]
Hakim, Nawar [4 ]
Boman, Darius A. [4 ]
机构
[1] Baylor Coll Med, Gastroenterol & Hepatol Sect, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] East Carolina Univ, Div Gastroenterol, Dept Internal Med, Greenville, NC USA
[3] Texas Tech Univ, Hlth Sci Ctr, Paul L Foster Sch Med, Dept Pathol, El Paso, TX USA
[4] Texas Tech Univ, Hlth Sci Ctr, Div Gastroenterol, Dept Internal Med,Paul L Foster Sch Med, El Paso, TX USA
关键词
endoscopic ultrasound; fine needle aspiration; 22; gauge; endoscopy; pancreatic adenocarcinoma; lymphadenopathy; SOLID PANCREATIC NEOPLASMS; SINGLE-CENTER EXPERIENCE; EUS-GUIDED FNA; BIOPSY; DIAGNOSIS; MASSES; CYTOLOGY;
D O I
10.1002/dc.23689
中图分类号
R446 [实验室诊断]; R-33 [实验医学、医学实验];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
BackgroundEndoscopic ultrasound (EUS) fine needle aspiration (FNA) is an integral part in the diagnosis of pancreatic, intestinal and extra-intestinal masses or lesions. There is no clear data on the superiority of the core biopsy needle over standard 22-gauge needles. The aim of this study is to prospectively compare the cellularity yield of three commonly used 22-gauge FNA needles available in the US market. Methods: This is a prospective, randomized study comparing the cellularity yield of three commercially available EUS needles (two standard FNA needles and core biopsy needle). Two blinded pathologists evaluated the cytology specimens based on an already agreed upon cytology score. We included adult patients (18-80 years old) who presented to our endoscopy unit for FNA of pancreatic or extrapancreatic masses. Results109 patients (57 F, 52 M) were recruited to the study, 88 lesions were pancreatic lesions. 39 patients were recruited in the EZ Shot 2 group, 36 in the Procore((R)) group and 34 in the Expect group. The average cellularity score and the mean number of passes (SD) were not different between the three needles; P=0.91 and P=0.16, respectively. There was no difference between the three needles in obtaining an onsite diagnosis (P=0.627) and no difference in reported adverse events between the three groups. ConclusionThe cellularity yields, the mean number of passes and reported adverse events were similar in the three compared 22-gauge needles. Diagn. Cytopathol. 2017;45:426-432. (c) 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:426 / 432
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Cellularity Yield of Three Different 22-Gauge Endoscopic Ultrasound Fine Needle Aspiration (FNA) Needles
    Othman, Mohamed O.
    Padilla, Osvaldo
    Elhanafi, Sherif
    Fallin, Sheri
    Acuna, Claudia
    Eloliby, Mohamed
    Torabi, Alireza
    Hakim, Nawar
    Boman, Darius A.
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2015, 81 (05) : AB541 - AB541
  • [2] Comparison of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration with 19-Gauge and 22-Gauge Needles for Solid Pancreatic Lesions
    Li, Changjuan
    Mi, Jianwei
    Gao, Fulai
    Zhu, Xinying
    Su, Miao
    Xie, Xiaoli
    Zhao, Dongqiang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GENERAL MEDICINE, 2021, 14 : 10439 - 10446
  • [3] Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration in Solid Pancreatic Tumors; A Prospective Randomized Comparison of 19-Gauge and 22-Gauge Aspiration Needles
    Song, Tae Jun
    Lee, Sang Soo
    Kim, Ji Hoon
    Park, Do Hyun
    Moon, Sung-Hoon
    Seo, Dong Wan
    Jang, Se Jin
    Lee, Sung Koo
    Kim, Myung-Hwan
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2009, 69 (05) : AB129 - AB129
  • [4] A prospective, randomized trial comparing 25-gauge and 22-gauge needles for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of pancreatic masses
    Lee, Jun Kyu
    Lee, Kyu Taek
    Choi, E. Ryoung
    Jang, Tae Hoon
    Jang, Kee-Taek
    Lee, Jong Kyun
    Lee, Kwang Hyuck
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2013, 48 (06) : 752 - 757
  • [5] 22-gauge core vs 22-gauge aspiration needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of abdominal masses
    William Sterlacci
    Athanasios D Sioulas
    Lothar Veits
    Pervin G?nüllü
    Guido Schachschal
    Stefan Groth
    Mario Anders
    Christos K Kontos
    Theodoros Topalidis
    Andrea Hinsch
    Michael Vieth
    Thomas R?sch
    Ulrike W Denzer
    World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2016, (39) : 8820 - 8830
  • [6] 22-gauge core vs 22-gauge aspiration needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of abdominal masses
    Sterlacci, William
    Sioulas, Athanasios D.
    Veits, Lothar
    Goenuellue, Pervin
    Schachschal, Guido
    Groth, Stefan
    Anders, Mario
    Kontos, Christos K.
    Topalidis, Theodoros
    Hinsch, Andrea
    Vieth, Michael
    Roescch, Thomas
    Denzer, Ulrike W.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2016, 22 (39) : 8820 - 8830
  • [7] Comparison of performace of 22 gauge and 25 gauge needles in endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) guided fine needle aspiration (FNA)
    Lee, Jeffrey H.
    Stewart, John
    Ananda, Sharmila
    Thirumurthi, Selvi
    Ross, William A.
    Xiao, Lianchun
    Staerkel, Gregg A.
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2007, 65 (05) : AB309 - AB309
  • [8] Comparison of the 22-gauge and 25-gauge needles for endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration
    Sakaguchi, Tadashi
    Inoue, Takeo
    Miyazawa, Teruomi
    Mineshita, Masamichi
    RESPIRATORY INVESTIGATION, 2021, 59 (02) : 235 - 239
  • [9] The diagnostic accuracy of 22-gauge and 25-gauge needles in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of solid pancreatic lesions: a meta-analysis
    Madhoun, M. F.
    Wani, S. B.
    Rastogi, A.
    Early, D.
    Gaddam, S.
    Tierney, W. M.
    Maple, J. T.
    ENDOSCOPY, 2013, 45 (02) : 86 - 92
  • [10] 22-gauge fine-needle biopsy needles: Primary workhorse for endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition
    Bang, Ji Young
    Varadarajulu, Shyam
    DIGESTIVE ENDOSCOPY, 2022, 34 (03) : 464 - 465