Gender difference with the use of percutaneous left ventricular assist device in patients undergoing complex high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: From pVAD Working Group

被引:5
|
作者
Doshi, Rajkumar [1 ]
Singh, Avneet [1 ]
Jauhar, Rajiv [1 ]
Meraj, Perwaiz M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Zucker Sch Med Hofstra Northwell, North Shore Univ Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Northwell Hlth, Hempstead, NY USA
关键词
High-risk PCI; percutaneous left ventricle assist device; gender disparities; MULTI-VESSEL DISEASE; ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION; BYPASS GRAFT-SURGERY; DRUG-ELUTING STENTS; IMPELLA; 2.5; CARDIOGENIC-SHOCK; INCOMPLETE REVASCULARIZATION; ONLY REVASCULARIZATION; HEMODYNAMIC SUPPORT; ARTERY;
D O I
10.1177/2048872617745790
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: The interventional treatment of complex high-risk indicated patients is technically difficult and can result in poor outcomes. Thus, percutaneous left ventricular assist devices are being increasingly used to provide hemodynamic support. No data is available comparing male and female for Complex High-risk Indicated Patients treated with percutaneous left ventricular assist devices. Our goal was to evaluate in-hospital as well as short term outcomes comparing males and females. Methods: There were 160 complex high-risk indicated patients with percutaneous left ventricular assist device use who were not in cardiogenic shock. A total of 132 male and 28 female patients were included. Ejection fraction below 35% with one additional criterion such as use of atherectomy device or treatment on unprotected left main disease or multi-vessel disease were our inclusion criteria. An Impella 2.5 or Impella CP (Abiomed Inc.) device was used as a left ventricular support device. Results: There was no difference in in-hospital mortality between the genders after performing a propensity score matched analysis (8.3% vs. 12.5%, p=0.54). Secondary outcomes of myocardial infarction, cardiogenic shock, congestive heart failure, dysrhythmia, major adverse cardiac events and composite of all complications were higher in males. Furthermore, 30-day survival was similar in males and females (88.9% vs. 87.5%, p=0.31). In addition, worse complications rates and survival were noted in patients with incomplete revascularization compared with those patients with complete revascularization in both gender. Conclusion: This study demonstrated no gender difference in clinical outcomes when using percutaneous left ventricular assist device support for the treatment of complex high-risk indicated patients. Overall, males had higher secondary outcomes compared with females with no difference in in-hospital mortality or 30-day survival rates.
引用
收藏
页码:369 / 378
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Response by Flaherty to Letter Regarding Article, "Hemodynamic Support With a Micro-Axial Percutaneous Left Ventricular Assist Device (Impella) Protects Against Acute Kidney Injury in Patients Undergoing High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention"
    Flaherty, Michael P.
    CIRCULATION RESEARCH, 2017, 120 (11) : E52 - E53
  • [42] Left ventricular unloading and concomitant total cardiac output increase by the use of percutaneous impella recover LP 2.5 assist device during high-risk coronary intervention
    Valgimigli, M
    Steendijk, P
    Sianos, G
    Onderwater, E
    Serruys, PW
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2005, 65 (02) : 263 - 267
  • [43] Safety and Efficacy of Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Device Versus Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump Supported High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (HRPCI)
    Shah, Tayyab
    Holy, Chantal
    Moses, Jeffrey
    Parise, Helen
    Lemor, Alejandro
    O'Neill, William
    Lansky, Alexandra
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2024, 84 (18) : B210 - B210
  • [44] Haemodynamical effects o fleft ventricular assistance during high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions with a pneumatic left ventricular assist device
    Bastos, B. M.
    Schreuder, J. J.
    Daemen, J.
    Den Uil, C. A.
    Van Mieghem, N. M.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2019, 40 : 3617 - 3617
  • [45] Complex percutaneous coronary intervention of highly calcified distal left main coronary artery supported by percutaneous left ventricular assist device in an octogenarian with severely reduced left ventricular ejection fraction
    Zimoch, Wojciech
    Rakotoarison, Oscar
    Kubler, Piotr
    Kosowski, Michal
    Telichowski, Artur
    Reczuch, Krzysztof
    KARDIOLOGIA POLSKA, 2019, 77 (09) : 881 - 882
  • [46] Usefulness of percutaneous left ventricular assistance to support high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions
    Lemos, PA
    Cummins, P
    Lee, CH
    Degertekin, M
    Gardien, M
    Ottervanger, JP
    Vranckx, P
    de Feyter, P
    Serruys, PW
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2003, 91 (04): : 479 - +
  • [47] Clinical Application of Prophylactic Percutaneous Left Ventricular Assist Device (Tandem Heart™) in High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Using an Arterial Preclosure Technique: Single-Center Experience
    Rajdev, Sanjay
    Krishnan, Prakash
    Irani, Adil
    Kim, Michael C.
    Moreno, Pedro R.
    Sharma, Samin K.
    Kini, Annapoorna S.
    JOURNAL OF INVASIVE CARDIOLOGY, 2008, 20 (02): : 67 - 72
  • [48] High risk percutaneous coronary interventions-significance of left ventricular assist device for clinical practice
    Ganyukov, Vladimir
    Tarasov, Roman
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE, 2015, 7 (10) : 1716 - 1718
  • [49] Percutaneous ventricular assist device for higher-risk percutaneous coronary intervention in surgically ineligible patients: Indications and outcomes from the OPTIMUM study
    Hirai, Taishi
    Grantham, J. Aaron
    Kandzari, David E.
    Ballard, William
    Brown, W. Morris
    Allen, Keith B.
    Kirtane, Ajay J.
    Argenziano, Michael
    Yeh, Robert W.
    Khabbaz, Kamal
    Lombardi, William
    Lasala, John
    Kachroo, Puja
    Karmpaliotis, Dimitri
    Gosch, Kensey L.
    Salisbury, Adam C.
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2023, 102 (05) : 814 - 822
  • [50] Letter by Naranjo et al Regarding Article, "Hemodynamic Support With a Micro-Axial Percutaneous Left Ventricular Assist Device (Impella) Protects Against Acute Kidney Injury in Patients Undergoing High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention"
    Naranjo, Mario
    Rangaswami, Janani
    Witzke, Christian
    CIRCULATION RESEARCH, 2017, 120 (11) : E51 - E51