Gender difference with the use of percutaneous left ventricular assist device in patients undergoing complex high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: From pVAD Working Group

被引:5
|
作者
Doshi, Rajkumar [1 ]
Singh, Avneet [1 ]
Jauhar, Rajiv [1 ]
Meraj, Perwaiz M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Zucker Sch Med Hofstra Northwell, North Shore Univ Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Northwell Hlth, Hempstead, NY USA
关键词
High-risk PCI; percutaneous left ventricle assist device; gender disparities; MULTI-VESSEL DISEASE; ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION; BYPASS GRAFT-SURGERY; DRUG-ELUTING STENTS; IMPELLA; 2.5; CARDIOGENIC-SHOCK; INCOMPLETE REVASCULARIZATION; ONLY REVASCULARIZATION; HEMODYNAMIC SUPPORT; ARTERY;
D O I
10.1177/2048872617745790
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: The interventional treatment of complex high-risk indicated patients is technically difficult and can result in poor outcomes. Thus, percutaneous left ventricular assist devices are being increasingly used to provide hemodynamic support. No data is available comparing male and female for Complex High-risk Indicated Patients treated with percutaneous left ventricular assist devices. Our goal was to evaluate in-hospital as well as short term outcomes comparing males and females. Methods: There were 160 complex high-risk indicated patients with percutaneous left ventricular assist device use who were not in cardiogenic shock. A total of 132 male and 28 female patients were included. Ejection fraction below 35% with one additional criterion such as use of atherectomy device or treatment on unprotected left main disease or multi-vessel disease were our inclusion criteria. An Impella 2.5 or Impella CP (Abiomed Inc.) device was used as a left ventricular support device. Results: There was no difference in in-hospital mortality between the genders after performing a propensity score matched analysis (8.3% vs. 12.5%, p=0.54). Secondary outcomes of myocardial infarction, cardiogenic shock, congestive heart failure, dysrhythmia, major adverse cardiac events and composite of all complications were higher in males. Furthermore, 30-day survival was similar in males and females (88.9% vs. 87.5%, p=0.31). In addition, worse complications rates and survival were noted in patients with incomplete revascularization compared with those patients with complete revascularization in both gender. Conclusion: This study demonstrated no gender difference in clinical outcomes when using percutaneous left ventricular assist device support for the treatment of complex high-risk indicated patients. Overall, males had higher secondary outcomes compared with females with no difference in in-hospital mortality or 30-day survival rates.
引用
收藏
页码:369 / 378
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION IN HIGH-RISK PATIENTS
    Alekyan, B. G.
    Navaliev, Yu M.
    KARDIOLOGIYA, 2024, 64 (10)
  • [32] In-Hospital Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Protected Left Main Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Percutaneous Left Ventricle Assist Device Protection
    Legutko, Jacek
    Kleczynski, Pawel
    Niewiara, Luke
    Pawlik, Artur
    Weglan, Katarzyna
    Kwiatkowska, Ewa
    Stanislaw, Bartus
    CIRCULATION, 2023, 148
  • [33] MECHANICAL LEFT-VENTRICULAR UNLOADING DURING HIGH-RISK CORONARY ANGIOPLASTY - FIRST USE OF A NEW PERCUTANEOUS TRANSVALVULAR LEFT-VENTRICULAR ASSIST DEVICE
    SCHOLZ, KH
    FIGULLA, HR
    SCHWEDA, F
    SMALLING, RW
    HELLIGE, G
    KREUZER, H
    ABOULHOSN, W
    WAMPLER, RK
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR DIAGNOSIS, 1994, 31 (01): : 61 - 69
  • [34] Use of a Percutaneous Left Ventricular Assist Device for Patients with Cardiogenic Shock
    Malick, Waqas
    Nouri, Shayan Nabavi
    Takeda, Koji
    Topkara, Veli
    Coromilas, Ellie
    Karmpaliotis, Dimitri
    Takayama, Hiroo
    Naka, Yoshifumi
    Colombo, Paolo
    Parikh, Manish
    Kodali, Susheel
    Green, Philip
    Vahl, Torsten
    Ali, Ziad
    Leon, Martin
    Moses, Jeffrey W.
    Kirtane, Ajay Jayant
    Garan, Arthur Reshad
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2018, 72 (13) : B196 - B196
  • [35] Feasibility of Complex Coronary Intervention in Combination With Percutaneous Aortic Valve Implantation in Patients With Aortic Stenosis Using Percutaneous Left Ventricular Assist Device (TandemHeart®)
    Piazza, Nicolo
    Serruys, Patrick W.
    de Jaegere, Peter
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2009, 73 (02) : 161 - 166
  • [36] Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Under Cover of Left Ventricular Assist Device (Impella 2.5)
    Iftikhar, Imran
    Khan, Hamid Sharif
    Kayani, Azhar Mahmood
    Shahzad, Hassan
    JCPSP-JOURNAL OF THE COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS PAKISTAN, 2015, 25 (10): : S78 - S80
  • [37] Use of a Percutaneous Left Ventricular Assist Device for High Risk Percutaneous Coronary Interventions. Clinical Trial versus Real World Experience
    Cohen, Mauricio G.
    Matthews, Ray V.
    Maini, Brij
    Dixon, Simon
    Vetrovec, George W.
    Wohns, David H.
    Palacios, Igor F.
    Popma, Jeffrey
    Ohman, E. Magnus
    Schreiber, Theodore
    O'Neill, William W.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2015, 66 (15) : B8 - B9
  • [38] Percutaneous coronary intervention with a percutaneous left ventricular assist device support (TandemHeart®): 6 years' experience and outcomes
    Loyalka, Pranav
    Nascimbene, Angelo
    Gregoric, Igor
    Kar, Biswajit
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2013, 62 (18) : B134 - B134
  • [39] Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With the TandemHeart™ Percutaneous Left Ventricular Assist Device Support: Six Years of Experience and Outcomes
    Nascimbene, Angelo
    Loyalka, Pranav
    Gregoric, Igor D.
    Kar, Biswajit
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2016, 87 (06) : 1101 - 1110
  • [40] Effects of Mechanical Left Ventricular Unloading by Impella on Left Ventricular Dynamics in High-Risk and Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Patients
    Remmelink, Maurice
    Sjauw, Krischan D.
    Henriques, Jose P. S.
    de Winter, Robbert J.
    Vis, Marije M.
    Koch, Karel T.
    Paulus, Walter J.
    de Mol, Bas A. J. M.
    Tijssen, Jan G. P.
    Piek, Jan J.
    Baan, Jan, Jr.
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2010, 75 (02) : 187 - 194