Gender difference with the use of percutaneous left ventricular assist device in patients undergoing complex high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: From pVAD Working Group

被引:5
|
作者
Doshi, Rajkumar [1 ]
Singh, Avneet [1 ]
Jauhar, Rajiv [1 ]
Meraj, Perwaiz M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Zucker Sch Med Hofstra Northwell, North Shore Univ Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Northwell Hlth, Hempstead, NY USA
关键词
High-risk PCI; percutaneous left ventricle assist device; gender disparities; MULTI-VESSEL DISEASE; ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION; BYPASS GRAFT-SURGERY; DRUG-ELUTING STENTS; IMPELLA; 2.5; CARDIOGENIC-SHOCK; INCOMPLETE REVASCULARIZATION; ONLY REVASCULARIZATION; HEMODYNAMIC SUPPORT; ARTERY;
D O I
10.1177/2048872617745790
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: The interventional treatment of complex high-risk indicated patients is technically difficult and can result in poor outcomes. Thus, percutaneous left ventricular assist devices are being increasingly used to provide hemodynamic support. No data is available comparing male and female for Complex High-risk Indicated Patients treated with percutaneous left ventricular assist devices. Our goal was to evaluate in-hospital as well as short term outcomes comparing males and females. Methods: There were 160 complex high-risk indicated patients with percutaneous left ventricular assist device use who were not in cardiogenic shock. A total of 132 male and 28 female patients were included. Ejection fraction below 35% with one additional criterion such as use of atherectomy device or treatment on unprotected left main disease or multi-vessel disease were our inclusion criteria. An Impella 2.5 or Impella CP (Abiomed Inc.) device was used as a left ventricular support device. Results: There was no difference in in-hospital mortality between the genders after performing a propensity score matched analysis (8.3% vs. 12.5%, p=0.54). Secondary outcomes of myocardial infarction, cardiogenic shock, congestive heart failure, dysrhythmia, major adverse cardiac events and composite of all complications were higher in males. Furthermore, 30-day survival was similar in males and females (88.9% vs. 87.5%, p=0.31). In addition, worse complications rates and survival were noted in patients with incomplete revascularization compared with those patients with complete revascularization in both gender. Conclusion: This study demonstrated no gender difference in clinical outcomes when using percutaneous left ventricular assist device support for the treatment of complex high-risk indicated patients. Overall, males had higher secondary outcomes compared with females with no difference in in-hospital mortality or 30-day survival rates.
引用
收藏
页码:369 / 378
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] UTILIZATION OF PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION (PCI) IN LEFT VENTRICULAR ASSIST DEVICE (LVAD) PATIENTS
    Shah, Deep
    Shah, Ali
    Bittenbender, Peter M.
    Varian, Kenneth
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2023, 81 (08) : 3100 - 3100
  • [22] Trends in the Outcomes of High-risk Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Device-assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, 2008-2018
    Lemor, Alejandro
    Basir, Mir B.
    Truesdell, Alexander G.
    Tamis-Holland, Jacqueline E.
    Alqarqaz, Mohammad
    Grines, Cindy L.
    Villablanca, Pedro A.
    Alaswad, Khaldoon
    Pinto, Duane S.
    O'Neill, William
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2021, 156 : 65 - 71
  • [23] LEFT VENTRICULAR ASSIST DEVICE VERSUS INTRA AORTIC BALLOON PUMP IN HIGH-RISK PATIENTS UNDERGOING PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION: A META-ANALYSIS OF RANDOMIZED TRIALS
    Majmundar, Monil M.
    Azhar, Abdullah Zoheb
    Kansara, Tikal
    Shah, Palak
    Doshi, Rajkumar P.
    Mene-Afejuku, Tuoyo
    Patel, Krunalkumar
    Patel, Harsh
    Visco, Ferdinand
    Pekler, Gerald
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2020, 75 (11) : 1239 - 1239
  • [24] Percutaneous left ventricular assist devices during cardiogenic shock and high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions
    Cook S.
    Windecker S.
    Current Cardiology Reports, 2009, 11 (5) : 369 - 376
  • [25] Illness Severity Among Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Device Versus Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump Supported High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (HRPCI)
    Shah, Tayyab
    Holy, Chantal
    Moses, Jeffrey
    Parise, Helen
    Lemor, Alejandro
    O'Neill, William
    Lansky, Alexandra
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2024, 84 (18) : B209 - B209
  • [26] Percutaneous left ventricular assist device for high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions: Real-world versus clinical trial experience
    Cohen, Mauricio G.
    Matthews, Ray
    Maini, Brij
    Dixon, Simon
    Vetrovec, George
    Wohns, David
    Palacios, Igor
    Popma, Jeffrey
    Ohman, E. Magnus
    Schreiber, Theodore
    O'Neill, William W.
    AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2015, 170 (05) : 872 - 879
  • [27] Outcomes of bailout percutaneous ventricular assist device versus prophylactic strategy in patients undergoing nonemergent percutaneous coronary intervention
    O'Neill, Brian P.
    Grines, Cindy
    Moses, Jeffrey W.
    Ohman, E. Magnus
    Lansky, Alexandra
    Popma, Jeffery
    Kapur, Navin K.
    Schreiber, Theodore
    Mannino, Salvatore
    O'Neill, William W.
    Medjamia, Amin M.
    Mahmud, Ehtisham
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2021, 98 (04) : E501 - E512
  • [28] The Impella ventricular assist device: use in patients at high risk for coronary interventions: successful multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention in a 62-year-old high-risk patient
    Marella, Punnaiah C.
    Lassetter, John E.
    Heuser, Richard R.
    CARDIOVASCULAR REVASCULARIZATION MEDICINE, 2011, 12 (01) : 69E9 - 69E12
  • [29] Percutaneous Circulatory Assist Devices for High-Risk Coronary Intervention
    Myat, Aung
    Patel, Niket
    Tehrani, Shana
    Banning, Adrian P.
    Redwood, Simon R.
    Bhatt, Deepak L.
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2015, 8 (02) : 229 - 244
  • [30] Meta-Analysis of Usefulness of Percutaneous Left Ventricular Assist Devices for High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Interventions
    Briasoulis, Alexandros
    Telila, Tesfaye
    Palla, Mohan
    Mercado, Nestor
    Kondur, Ashok
    Grines, Cindy
    Schreiber, Theodore
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2016, 118 (03): : 369 - 375