Diabetes self-management education: acceptability of using trained lay educators

被引:12
|
作者
Mandalia, P. K. [1 ]
Stone, M. A. [2 ]
Davies, M. J. [3 ]
Khunti, K. [3 ]
Carey, M. E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Leicester Gen Hosp, Univ Hosp Leicester, Leicester Diabet Ctr, Leicester LE5 4PW, Leics, England
[2] Leicester Gen Hosp, Univ Hosp Leicester, Diabet Res Ctr, Leicester LE5 4PW, Leics, England
[3] Univ Leicester, Coll Med Biol Sci & Psychol, Diabet Res Ctr, Leicester Diabet Ctr,Leicester Gen Hosp, Leicester, Leics, England
关键词
PEOPLE; PROGRAM; INTERVENTION;
D O I
10.1136/postgradmedj-2014-132865
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background The use of lay people to deliver education programmes for people with chronic conditions is a potential method of addressing healthcare staff capacity and increasing the cost efficiency of delivering education. This qualitative substudy is embedded within an equivalence trial (2008-2011 including development stage). Objectives In the qualitative substudy, we aimed to elicit the views of key stakeholders (patients, educators) about using lay people to deliver education to people recently diagnosed with type 2 diabetes, alongside a healthcare professional educator with an equal role. In this way, we sought to explore perceptions about acceptability and also contribute to understanding the reasons underlying positive or negative quantitative findings from main trial. Methods We conducted 27 telephone interviews with a purposive sample of patients, lay educators and healthcare professional educators involved in the main trial. Thematic analysis of transcribed data was underpinned by the constant comparative approach and structured using Framework methodology. Results Overall, the data suggested that the use of lay educators was acceptable to educators and patients. Perceived difference in knowledge levels between lay and healthcare professional educators did not appear to have an impact on perceived acceptability or the effectiveness of the education received. Additional themes explored were related to peer status of educators and feasibility. Some concerns were raised about lay educators with diabetes, transferring personal issues and about the impact of healthcare professional time taken up by mentoring and supporting lay educators. Conclusions Positive perceptions about the use of lay educators support the positive quantitative findings from the main trial. Acceptability is an important consideration in relation to implementation of the model of delivery studied. Concerns raised within the interviews should be considered in the design of training for lay educators.
引用
收藏
页码:638 / 642
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] USING A DIABETES SELF-MANAGEMENT APP TO INCREASE HEALTH LITERACY AND DIABETES SELF-MANAGEMENT: A PILOT STUDY
    Taut, Diana
    Monica, Popa
    PSYCHOSOMATIC MEDICINE, 2020, 82 (06): : A125 - A126
  • [42] Getting referrals for diabetes education and self-management training
    Albisser, AM
    Harris, RI
    Sperlich, M
    Albisser, JB
    DIABETES EDUCATOR, 1999, 25 (06): : 959 - +
  • [43] The Effects of Diabetes Self-Management Education on Weight Outcomes
    Parkes, Emmy
    Brackin, Bruce
    Bouldin, Marshall
    OBESITY, 2008, 16 : S312 - S313
  • [44] Effectiveness of Diabetes Self-Management Education in Community Health
    Brown, Keila
    Lee, Loretta T.
    Selleck, Cynthia
    JOURNAL OF DOCTORAL NURSING PRACTICE, 2019, 12 (01) : 96 - 101
  • [45] Diabetes self-management education core outcomes measures
    Mulcahy, K
    Maryniuk, M
    Peeples, M
    Peyrot, M
    Tomky, D
    Weaver, T
    Yarborough, P
    DIABETES EDUCATOR, 2003, 29 (05): : 768 - +
  • [46] National Standards for Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support
    Haas, Linda
    Maryniuk, Melinda
    Beck, Joni
    Cox, Carla E.
    Duker, Paulina
    Edwards, Laura
    Fisher, Edwin B.
    Hanson, Lenita
    Kent, Daniel
    Kolb, Leslie
    McLaughlin, Sue
    Orzeck, Eric
    Piette, John D.
    Rhinehart, Andrew S.
    Rothman, Russell
    Sklaroff, Sara
    Tomky, Donna
    Tomky, Donna
    Youssef, Gretchen
    DIABETES CARE, 2013, 36 : S100 - S108
  • [47] Are Benefits From Diabetes Self-Management Education Sustained?
    Sperl-Hillen, JoAnn
    Beaton, Sarah
    Fernandes, Omar
    Von Worley, Ann
    Vazquez-Benitez, Gabriela
    Hanson, Ann
    Lavin-Tompkins, Jodi
    Parsons, William
    Adams, Kenneth
    Spain, C. Victor
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MANAGED CARE, 2013, 19 (02): : 104 - 112
  • [48] National Standards for Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support
    Haas, Linda
    Maryniuk, Melinda
    Beck, Joni
    Cox, Carla E.
    Duker, Paulina
    Edwards, Laura
    Fisher, Edwin B.
    Hanson, Lenita
    Kent, Daniel
    Kolb, Leslie
    McLaughlin, Sue
    Orzeck, Eric
    Piette, John D.
    Rhinehart, Andrew S.
    Rothman, Russell
    Sklaroff, Sara
    Tomky, Donna
    Youssef, Gretchen
    DIABETES CARE, 2012, 35 (11) : 2393 - 2401
  • [49] National Standards for Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support
    Haas, Linda
    Maryniuk, Melinda
    Beck, Joni
    Cox, Carla E.
    Duker, Paulina
    Edwards, Laura
    Fisher, Edwin B.
    Hanson, Lenita
    Kent, Daniel
    Kolb, Leslie
    McLaughlin, Sue
    Orzeck, Eric
    Piette, John D.
    Rhinehart, Andrew S.
    Rothman, Russell
    Sklaroff, Sara
    Tomky, Donna
    Youssef, Gretchen
    DIABETES CARE, 2014, 37 : S144 - S153
  • [50] The impact of health literacy on diabetes self-management education
    Vandenbosch, Jessica
    Van den Broucke, Stephan
    Schinckus, Louise
    Schwarz, Peter
    Doyle, Gerardine
    Pelikan, Juergen
    Muller, Ingrid
    Levin-Zamir, Diane
    Schillinger, Dean
    Chang, Peter
    Terkildsen-Maindal, Helle
    HEALTH EDUCATION JOURNAL, 2018, 77 (03) : 349 - 362