Diabetes self-management education: acceptability of using trained lay educators

被引:12
|
作者
Mandalia, P. K. [1 ]
Stone, M. A. [2 ]
Davies, M. J. [3 ]
Khunti, K. [3 ]
Carey, M. E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Leicester Gen Hosp, Univ Hosp Leicester, Leicester Diabet Ctr, Leicester LE5 4PW, Leics, England
[2] Leicester Gen Hosp, Univ Hosp Leicester, Diabet Res Ctr, Leicester LE5 4PW, Leics, England
[3] Univ Leicester, Coll Med Biol Sci & Psychol, Diabet Res Ctr, Leicester Diabet Ctr,Leicester Gen Hosp, Leicester, Leics, England
关键词
PEOPLE; PROGRAM; INTERVENTION;
D O I
10.1136/postgradmedj-2014-132865
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background The use of lay people to deliver education programmes for people with chronic conditions is a potential method of addressing healthcare staff capacity and increasing the cost efficiency of delivering education. This qualitative substudy is embedded within an equivalence trial (2008-2011 including development stage). Objectives In the qualitative substudy, we aimed to elicit the views of key stakeholders (patients, educators) about using lay people to deliver education to people recently diagnosed with type 2 diabetes, alongside a healthcare professional educator with an equal role. In this way, we sought to explore perceptions about acceptability and also contribute to understanding the reasons underlying positive or negative quantitative findings from main trial. Methods We conducted 27 telephone interviews with a purposive sample of patients, lay educators and healthcare professional educators involved in the main trial. Thematic analysis of transcribed data was underpinned by the constant comparative approach and structured using Framework methodology. Results Overall, the data suggested that the use of lay educators was acceptable to educators and patients. Perceived difference in knowledge levels between lay and healthcare professional educators did not appear to have an impact on perceived acceptability or the effectiveness of the education received. Additional themes explored were related to peer status of educators and feasibility. Some concerns were raised about lay educators with diabetes, transferring personal issues and about the impact of healthcare professional time taken up by mentoring and supporting lay educators. Conclusions Positive perceptions about the use of lay educators support the positive quantitative findings from the main trial. Acceptability is an important consideration in relation to implementation of the model of delivery studied. Concerns raised within the interviews should be considered in the design of training for lay educators.
引用
收藏
页码:638 / 642
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Using social marketing to develop diabetes self-management education interventions
    Thackeray, R
    Neiger, BL
    DIABETES EDUCATOR, 2002, 28 (04): : 536 - +
  • [32] Self-management education programmes by lay leaders for people with chronic conditions
    Foster, G.
    Taylor, S. J. C.
    Eldridge, S. E.
    Ramsay, J.
    Griffiths, C. J.
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2007, (04):
  • [33] Self-care Diabetes: a diabetes self-management application based on the seven self-management areas (AADE7) of the American Association of Diabetes Educators
    Nikoviotis, Rafail
    Ringas, Dimitrios
    25TH PAN-HELLENIC CONFERENCE ON INFORMATICS WITH INTERNATIONAL PARTICIPATION (PCI2021), 2021, : 477 - 482
  • [34] Education, education, education: a surge of interest in education for diabetes self-management
    Gregory, Robert
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF DIABETES AND VASCULAR DISEASE, 2015, 15 (01): : 1 - 2
  • [35] An Evaluation of a Diabetes Self-Management Education (DSME) Intervention Delivered Using Avatar-Based Technology: Certified Diabetes Educators' Ratings and Perceptions
    Duncan-Carnesciali, Joanne
    Wallace, Barbara C.
    Odlum, Michelle
    DIABETES EDUCATOR, 2018, 44 (03): : 216 - 224
  • [36] Participant acceptability of a diabetes self-management education program delivered through telemedicine in rural underserved communities
    Rizvi, Ali
    Haddock, K. Sue
    Davis, Richard M.
    Mayer-Davis, Elizabeth
    Hitch, Angela
    Nichols, Michele
    Salaam, Muhammad
    DIABETES, 2008, 57 : A247 - A247
  • [37] Is diabetes self-management education still the Cinderella of diabetes care?
    Hurley, Lorna
    O'Donnell, Maire
    O'Hara, Mary Clare
    Carey, Marian E.
    Willaing, Ingrid
    Daly, Heather
    Dinneen, Sean F.
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2017, 100 (10) : 1957 - 1960
  • [38] Development of the American association of diabetes educators' Diabetes Self-management Assessment Report Tool
    Peyrot, Mark
    Peeples, Malinda
    Tomky, Donna
    Charron-Prochownik, Denise
    Weaver, Todd
    DIABETES EDUCATOR, 2007, 33 (05): : 818 - 826
  • [39] The Efficacy of Diabetes Patient Education and Self-Management Education in Type 2 Diabetes
    McGowan, Patrick
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF DIABETES, 2011, 35 (01) : 46 - 53
  • [40] Internet Delivered Diabetes Self-Management Education: A Review
    Pereira, Katherine
    Phillips, Beth
    Johnson, Constance
    Vorderstrasse, Allison
    DIABETES TECHNOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2015, 17 (01) : 55 - 63