Diabetes self-management education: acceptability of using trained lay educators

被引:12
|
作者
Mandalia, P. K. [1 ]
Stone, M. A. [2 ]
Davies, M. J. [3 ]
Khunti, K. [3 ]
Carey, M. E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Leicester Gen Hosp, Univ Hosp Leicester, Leicester Diabet Ctr, Leicester LE5 4PW, Leics, England
[2] Leicester Gen Hosp, Univ Hosp Leicester, Diabet Res Ctr, Leicester LE5 4PW, Leics, England
[3] Univ Leicester, Coll Med Biol Sci & Psychol, Diabet Res Ctr, Leicester Diabet Ctr,Leicester Gen Hosp, Leicester, Leics, England
关键词
PEOPLE; PROGRAM; INTERVENTION;
D O I
10.1136/postgradmedj-2014-132865
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background The use of lay people to deliver education programmes for people with chronic conditions is a potential method of addressing healthcare staff capacity and increasing the cost efficiency of delivering education. This qualitative substudy is embedded within an equivalence trial (2008-2011 including development stage). Objectives In the qualitative substudy, we aimed to elicit the views of key stakeholders (patients, educators) about using lay people to deliver education to people recently diagnosed with type 2 diabetes, alongside a healthcare professional educator with an equal role. In this way, we sought to explore perceptions about acceptability and also contribute to understanding the reasons underlying positive or negative quantitative findings from main trial. Methods We conducted 27 telephone interviews with a purposive sample of patients, lay educators and healthcare professional educators involved in the main trial. Thematic analysis of transcribed data was underpinned by the constant comparative approach and structured using Framework methodology. Results Overall, the data suggested that the use of lay educators was acceptable to educators and patients. Perceived difference in knowledge levels between lay and healthcare professional educators did not appear to have an impact on perceived acceptability or the effectiveness of the education received. Additional themes explored were related to peer status of educators and feasibility. Some concerns were raised about lay educators with diabetes, transferring personal issues and about the impact of healthcare professional time taken up by mentoring and supporting lay educators. Conclusions Positive perceptions about the use of lay educators support the positive quantitative findings from the main trial. Acceptability is an important consideration in relation to implementation of the model of delivery studied. Concerns raised within the interviews should be considered in the design of training for lay educators.
引用
收藏
页码:638 / 642
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] National Standards for Diabetes Self-Management Education
    Funnell, Martha M.
    Brown, Tammy L.
    Childs, Belinda P.
    Haas, Linda B.
    Hosey, Gwen M.
    Jensen, Brian
    Maryniuk, Melinda
    Peyrot, Mark
    Piette, John D.
    Reader, Diane
    Siminerio, Linda M.
    Weinger, Katie
    Weiss, Michael A.
    DIABETES CARE, 2011, 34 : S89 - S96
  • [22] National standards for diabetes self-management education
    Funnell, Martha M.
    Brown, Tammy L.
    Childs, Belinda P.
    Haas, Linda B.
    Hosey, Gwen M.
    Jensen, Brian
    Maryniuk, Melinda
    Peyrot, Mark
    Piette, John D.
    Reader, Diane
    Siminerio, Linda M.
    Weinger, Katie
    Weiss, Michael A.
    DIABETES CARE, 2008, 31 : S97 - S104
  • [23] National Standards for Diabetes Self-Management Education
    Funnell, Martha M.
    Brown, Tammy L.
    Childs, Belinda P.
    Haas, Linda B.
    Hosey, Gwen M.
    Jensen, Brian
    Maryniuk, Melinda
    Peyrot, Mark
    Piette, John D.
    Reader, Diane
    Siminerio, Linda M.
    Weinger, Katie
    Weiss, Michael A.
    DIABETES CARE, 2012, 35 (01) : S101 - S108
  • [24] National standards for diabetes self-management education
    Funnell, Martha M.
    Brown, Tammy L.
    Childs, Belinda P.
    Haas, Linda B.
    Hosey, Gwen M.
    Jensen, Brian
    Maryniuk, Melinda
    Peyrot, Mark
    Piette, John D.
    Reader, Diane
    Siminerio, Linda M.
    Weinger, Katie
    Weiss, Michael A.
    DIABETES CARE, 2007, 30 (06) : 1630 - 1637
  • [25] National standards for diabetes self-management education
    Mensing, C
    Boucher, J
    Cypress, M
    Weinger, K
    Mulcahy, K
    Barta, P
    Hosey, G
    Kopher, W
    Lasichak, A
    Lamb, B
    Mangan, M
    Norman, J
    Tanja, J
    Yauk, L
    Wisdom, K
    Adams, C
    DIABETES CARE, 2006, 29 : S78 - S85
  • [26] Diabetes UK Education and Self-management Award
    Williams, D. M.
    Nawaz, A.
    Stephens, E.
    Roberts, A.
    George, L.
    DIABETIC MEDICINE, 2020, 37 : 9 - 10
  • [27] Diabetes Self-Management Education: Miles to Go
    Klein, Helen Altman
    Jackson, Sarah M.
    Street, Kenley
    Whitacre, James C.
    Klein, Gary
    NURSING RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2013, 2013
  • [28] National Standards for Diabetes Self-Management Education
    Funnel, Martha M.
    Brown, Tammy L.
    Childs, Belinda P.
    Haas, Linda B.
    Hosey, Gwen M.
    Jensen, Brain
    Maryniuk, Melinda
    Peyrot, Mark
    Piette, John D.
    Reader, Diane
    Diminerio, Linda M.
    Weinger, Katie
    Weiss, Michael A.
    DIABETES CARE, 2009, 32 : S87 - S94
  • [29] Effectiveness of the diabetes self-management education programme
    Shah, Sangeeta
    DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2008, 79 : S120 - S120
  • [30] ECONOMIC IMPACT OF DIABETES SELF-MANAGEMENT EDUCATION
    Chinaeke, E. E.
    Lu, K. Z.
    Li, M. S.
    Wu, J.
    Reeder, G.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2018, 21 : S74 - S74