Evaluation of the ACR MRI phantom for quality assurance tests of 1.5 T MRI scanners in Estonian hospitals

被引:4
|
作者
Kaljuste, Doris [1 ]
Nigul, Mait [2 ]
机构
[1] Tallinn Univ Technol, Dept Biomed Engn, EE-19086 Tallinn, Estonia
[2] East Tallinn Cent Hosp, EE-10138 Tallinn, Estonia
关键词
magnetic resonance imaging; ACR MRI phantom; quality assurance; MRI image quality;
D O I
10.3176/proc.2014.3.06
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Since its discovery, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been one of the main methods of imaging in radiology. So far, there are not many national or international guidelines for MRI quality assurance compared to imaging methods that are using ionizing radiation. American College of Radiology (ACR) has an accreditation program that includes a standardized image quality measurement protocol and a phantom. Seven important assessments of MRI image quality are included with acceptance criteria. The aim of this study was to determine whether using the ACR MRI phantom would be a suitable quality assurance method for MRI systems in Estonia. In order to determine if the ACR MRI phantom would be a suitable quality assurance method for MRI systems in Estonia, six MRI scanners were tested using the ACR MRI accreditation program phantom and method. Information about the image quality was obtained and 33% of the MRI scanners passed all seven assessments. In conclusion, the ACR MRI phantom is a suitable test body for some of the MRI scanners in Estonia and should be considered to be used for regular quality testing. Due to the fact that in some cases the ACR MRI phantom did not fit into the head coil, using the ACR MRI phantom cannot be nationally required and other quality assurance phantoms should also be assessed. Adding signal-to-noise ratio assessment to seven assessment criteria, provided by ACR quality assurance manual, and developing an automated ACR quality assurance procedure would make quality assurance with ACR MRI phantom more beneficial.
引用
收藏
页码:240 / 246
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] COMPARISON of VARIOUS MRI FAT SUPPRESSION TECHNIQUES on A WATER-FAT PHANTOM at 1.5 T
    Wang H.-C.
    Chen P.-C.
    Chou C.-H.
    Shy C.-G.
    Jao J.-C.
    Jao, Jo-Chi (jochja@kmu.edu.tw), 1600, World Scientific (29):
  • [42] 1.5T MRI, ARTHROGRAPHY AND ARTHROSCOPY IN THE EVALUATION OF LESIONS OF THE KNEE
    JUNG, T
    RODRIGUEZ, M
    AUGUSTINY, N
    FRIEDERICH, N
    VONSCHULTHESS, G
    FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIETE DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER NUKLEARMEDIZIN, 1988, 148 (04): : 390 - 393
  • [43] Evaluation of axial gradient Echo spiral MRI of the spine at 1.5 T
    Robison, Ryan K. K.
    Cornejo, Patricia
    Kuwabara, Michael
    Ooi, Melvyn B. B.
    Temkit, Hamy
    Miller, Jeffrey H. H.
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2022, 89 : 24 - 32
  • [44] Thermal effect of clinical brain MRI protocol with high magnetic fields (1.5 and 3.0 T MRI) in a phantom model pork sample
    Kim, M. S.
    Kim, Y. J.
    TOXICOLOGY LETTERS, 2010, 196 : S61 - S61
  • [45] A Path to Qualification of PET/MRI Scanners for Multicenter Brain Imaging Studies: Evaluation of MRI-Based Attenuation Correction Methods Using a Patient Phantom
    Catana, Ciprian
    Laforest, Richard
    An, Hongyu
    Boada, Fernando
    Cao, Tuoyu
    Faul, David
    Jakoby, Bjoern
    Jansen, Floris P.
    Kemp, Bradley J.
    Kinahan, Paul E.
    Larson, Peder
    Levine, Michael A.
    Maniawski, Piotr
    Mawlawi, Osama
    McConathy, Jonathan E.
    McMillan, Alan B.
    Price, Julie C.
    Rajagopal, Abhejit
    Sunderland, John
    Veit-Haibach, Patrick
    Wangerin, Kristen A.
    Ying, Chunwei
    Hope, Thomas A.
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2022, 63 (04) : 615 - 621
  • [46] Assessment the Influencing Factors on MRS Signal Obtained from High Magnetic Field Strength (1.5T) MRI Scanners During the Application of Homemade Metabolite Phantom
    Saeedi-Moghadam, Mahdi
    Pouladian, Majid
    Lotfi, Mehrzad
    Faghihi, Reza
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETICS, 2019, 24 (01) : 90 - 98
  • [47] Qualitative comparison of 3-T and 1.5-T MRI in the evaluation of epilepsy
    Phal, Pramit M.
    Usmanov, Alexander
    Nesbit, Gary M.
    Anderson, James C.
    Spencer, David
    Wang, Paul
    Helwig, Jonathan A.
    Roberts, Colin
    Hamilton, Bronwyn E.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2008, 191 (03) : 890 - 895
  • [48] Fully-automated quality assurance in multi-center studies using MRI phantom measurements
    Davids, Mathias
    Zoellner, Frank G.
    Ruttorf, Michaela
    Nees, Frauke
    Flor, Herta
    Schumann, Gunter
    Schad, Lothar R.
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2014, 32 (06) : 771 - 780
  • [49] Electromagnetic Exposure of Personnel Involved in Cardiac MRI Examinations in 1.5T, 3T and 7T Scanners
    Sklinda, Katarzyna
    Karpowicz, Jolanta
    Stepniewski, Andrzej
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (01)
  • [50] Development and Implementation of Task-Specific Modular Phantom for MRI Quality Evaluation
    Cho, H.
    Hong, C.
    Doh, I.
    Ahn, B.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 43 (06) : 3391 - 3391