Thermal effect of clinical brain MRI protocol with high magnetic fields (1.5 and 3.0 T MRI) in a phantom model pork sample

被引：0
|
作者：
Kim, M. S. [1 ]
Kim, Y. J. [1 ]
机构：
[1] Seoul Natl Univ, Grad Sch Publ Hlth, Natl Canc Ctr, Seoul 151, South Korea
来源：
TOXICOLOGY LETTERS | 2010年 / 196卷
关键词：
D O I：
10.1016/j.toxlet.2010.03.237
中图分类号：
R99 [毒物学（毒理学）];
学科分类号：
100405 ;
摘要：
引用
收藏
页码：S61 / S61
页数：1
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Exposure levels of radiofrequency magnetic fields and static magnetic fields in 1.5 and 3.0 T MRI units
    Rathebe, P.
    Weyers, C.
    Raphela, F.
    SN APPLIED SCIENCES, 2021, 3 (02):
  • [2] Exposure levels of radiofrequency magnetic fields and static magnetic fields in 1.5 and 3.0 T MRI units
    P. Rathebe
    C. Weyers
    F. Raphela
    SN Applied Sciences, 2021, 3
  • [3] Clinical advantages of 3.0 T MRI over 1.5 T
    Willinek, Winfried A.
    Schild, Hans H.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2008, 65 (01) : 2 - 14
  • [4] An Investigation Into the Effect of Different Static Magnetic Fields of 1.5-T and 3.0-T MRI on the Measurement of Tumor Diameters in Breast Cancer
    Yamamoto, Shinji
    Okada, Yukinori
    Yoshida, Nobukiyo
    Takeshita, Koji
    Sakurai, Noriko
    Ichikawa, Atsushi
    Takimoto, Manabu
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (01)
  • [5] Application of Quantitative MRI for Brain Tissue Segmentation at 1.5 T and 3.0 T Field Strengths
    West, Janne
    Blystad, Ida
    Engstrom, Maria
    Warntjes, Jan B. M.
    Lundberg, Peter
    PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (09):
  • [6] A health and safety model for occupational exposure to radiofrequency fields and static magnetic fields from 1.5 and 3 T MRI scanners
    P. Rathebe
    C. Weyers
    F. Raphela
    Health and Technology, 2020, 10 : 39 - 50
  • [7] A health and safety model for occupational exposure to radiofrequency fields and static magnetic fields from 1.5 and 3 T MRI scanners
    Rathebe, P.
    Weyers, C.
    Raphela, F.
    HEALTH AND TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 10 (01) : 39 - 50
  • [8] Brain MR imaging (MRI) on a high field (3.0T) vertical bore system in comparison to conventional horizontal 3.0T MRI
    Nakada, T
    Fujii, Y
    Matsuzawa, H
    Suzuki, K
    Kwee, IL
    RADIOLOGY, 2000, 217 : 513 - 513
  • [9] CLINICAL OUTCOMES OF BRAIN METASTASES TREATED WITH GAMMA KNIFE RADIOSURGERY WITH 3.0 T VS. 1.5 T MRI-BASED TREATMENT PLANNING
    Loganathan, Amritraj G.
    Chan, Michael D.
    Alphonse, Natalie
    Peiffer, Ann M.
    Johnson, Annette
    McMullen, Kevin P.
    Urbanic, James J.
    Saconn, Paul A.
    Bourland, J. D.
    Munley, Michael T.
    Shaw, Edward G.
    Tatter, Stephen B.
    Ellis, Thomas L.
    NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2011, 13 : 129 - 129
  • [10] 3.0 vs 1.5 T MRI in the detection of focal cartilage pathology - ROC analysis in an experimental model
    Link, TM
    Sell, CA
    Masi, JN
    Phan, C
    Newitt, D
    Steinbach, L
    Majumdar, S
    OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 2006, 14 (01) : 63 - 70
12345