Attitudes, experiences, and preferences of ophthalmic professionals regarding routine use of patient-reported outcome measures in clinical practice

被引:7
|
作者
Robertson, Alexandra O. [1 ]
Tadic, Valerija [1 ,2 ]
Rahi, Jugnoo S. [1 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] UCL Great Ormond St GOS Inst Child Hlth, Populat Policy & Practice Res & Teaching Dept, London, England
[2] Univ Greenwich, Sch Human Sci, London, England
[3] Great Ormond St Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, London, England
[4] Moorfields Eye Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Biomed Res Ctr, Natl Inst Hlth Res NIHR, London, England
[5] UCL Inst Ophthalmol, London, England
[6] Ulverscroft Vis Res Grp, London, England
来源
PLOS ONE | 2020年 / 15卷 / 12期
关键词
FUNCTIONAL VISION; VISUAL IMPAIRMENT; MEASURES PROMS; YOUNG-PEOPLE; HEALTH-CARE; CHILDREN; FEEDBACK; IMPACT; TIME;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0243563
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background/Objectives Routine use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to assess quality of health care systems is mandated in many countries and has been implemented successfully in many specialities. Ophthalmology currently lags behind. To support and inform future implementation, we investigated paediatric ophthalmic clinicians' experience of, and future training needs for, using child-appropriate vision PROMs and their views about the barriers and enablers to future routine implementation in clinical practice. Methods We conducted a pilot study, using an online survey to elicit the experience, attitudes, training needs and perceptions of barriers and enablers to routine PROMs use of ophthalmic health professionals in the Paediatric Ophthalmology Department at Great Ormond Street Hospital, London. A focus-group was undertaken to discuss survey results and preferences regarding presentation of PROM data. Analysis comprised descriptive statistics, presented alongside complementary qualitative data. Results Eighteen clinicians in the department completed the survey. Twenty-seven took part in the focus group. Clinicians had limited experience of using PROMs but high confidence in the potential positive impact on communication with patients, monitoring chronic conditions and clinical decision-making. Clinicians identified operational issues (collection and analysis of data) and impact (interpretation and application of data) as the two key areas for consideration. Training and information requirements before implementation were clearly articulated, alongside the benefits of using digital/electronic data capture ahead of consultations to allow efficiency and automated analysis, and presentation in an appropriate visual format alongside clinical data to ensure meaningful use. Conclusion The findings of this pilot study of ophthalmic clinicians working in a specialist paediatric ophthalmology department, suggest that ophthalmic clinicians recognise the potential benefits of routine PROMs use in clinical practice. Together with existing literature outside ophthalmology relating to overcoming barriers and exploiting enablers to routine implementation, findings may be applicable in planning routine PROM implementation in paediatric ophthalmology.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Routine Hematology Cancer Care
    Kirkpatrick, Suriya
    Campbell, Karen
    Harding, Samantha
    Rudd, Sarah
    CANCER NURSING, 2024,
  • [42] Stroke survivors’ preferences on assessing patient-reported outcome measures
    Richard Schmidt
    Daniela Geisler
    Daniela Urban
    Rebecca Pries
    Christina Franzisket
    Christian Voigt
    Galina Ivanova
    Thomas Neumuth
    Joseph Classen
    Markus Wagner
    Dominik Michalski
    Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, 7
  • [43] Stroke survivors' preferences on assessing patient-reported outcome measures
    Schmidt, Richard
    Geisler, Daniela
    Urban, Daniela
    Pries, Rebecca
    Franzisket, Christina
    Voigt, Christian
    Ivanova, Galina
    Neumuth, Thomas
    Classen, Joseph
    Wagner, Markus
    Michalski, Dominik
    JOURNAL OF PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES, 2023, 7 (01)
  • [44] Experience With the Routine Use of Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Patients With Lung Cancer
    Crockett, Cathryn
    Price, James
    Pham, Mai
    Abdulwahid, Danya
    Bayman, Neil
    Blackhall, Fiona
    Bostock, Layla
    Califano, Raffaele
    Chan, Clara
    Coote, Joanna
    Cove-Smith, Laura
    Eaton, Marie
    Fenemore, Jacqueline
    Gomes, Fabio
    Harris, Margaret
    Halkyard, Emma
    Hughes, Sarah
    Lindsay, Colin
    Neal, Hilary
    Mcentee, Delyth
    Pemberton, Laura
    Sheikh, Hamid
    Summers, Yvonne
    Taylor, Paul
    Woolf, David
    Yorke, Janelle
    Faivre-Finn, Corinne
    JCO CLINICAL CANCER INFORMATICS, 2023, 7
  • [45] Experience With the Routine Use of Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Patients With Lung Cancer
    Crockett, Cathryn
    Price, James
    Pham, Mai
    Abdulwahid, Danya
    Bayman, Neil
    Blackhall, Fiona
    Bostock, Layla
    Califano, Raffaele
    Chan, Clara
    Coote, Joanna
    Cove-Smith, Laura
    Eaton, Marie
    Fenemore, Jacqueline
    Gomes, Fabio
    Harris, Margaret
    Halkyard, Emma
    Hughes, Sarah
    Lindsay, Colin
    Neal, Hilary
    McEntee, Delyth
    Pemberton, Laura
    Sheikh, Hamid
    Summers, Yvonne
    Taylor, Paul
    Woolf, David
    Yorke, Janelle
    Faivre-Finn, Corinne
    JCO CLINICAL CANCER INFORMATICS, 2023, 7 : e2200150
  • [46] Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Use in Clinical Trials and Clinical Practice in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: A Systematic Review
    de Jong, Marin J.
    Huibregtse, Roxanne
    Masclee, Ad A. M.
    Jonkers, Daisy M. A. E.
    Pierik, Marie J.
    CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2018, 16 (05) : 648 - +
  • [47] AOFAS Position Statement Regarding Patient-Reported Outcome Measures
    Kitaoka, Harold B.
    Meeker, James E.
    Phisitkul, Phinit
    Adams, Samuel B., Jr.
    Kaplan, Jonathan R.
    Wagner, Emilio
    FOOT & ANKLE INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 39 (12) : 1389 - 1393
  • [48] Importance of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures on Clinical Practice in Patients With Kidney Disease
    Frazier, Rebecca
    Peipert, John Devin
    KIDNEY MEDICINE, 2021, 3 (04) : 473 - 474
  • [49] The impact of patient-reported outcome measures in clinical practice for pain: a systematic review
    Michelle M. Holmes
    George Lewith
    David Newell
    Jonathan Field
    Felicity L. Bishop
    Quality of Life Research, 2017, 26 : 245 - 257
  • [50] Head and Neck Cancer: Improving Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Clinical Practice
    Augusta Silveira
    Eurico Monteiro
    Teresa Sequeira
    Current Treatment Options in Oncology, 2018, 19