Attitudes, experiences, and preferences of ophthalmic professionals regarding routine use of patient-reported outcome measures in clinical practice

被引:7
|
作者
Robertson, Alexandra O. [1 ]
Tadic, Valerija [1 ,2 ]
Rahi, Jugnoo S. [1 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] UCL Great Ormond St GOS Inst Child Hlth, Populat Policy & Practice Res & Teaching Dept, London, England
[2] Univ Greenwich, Sch Human Sci, London, England
[3] Great Ormond St Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, London, England
[4] Moorfields Eye Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Biomed Res Ctr, Natl Inst Hlth Res NIHR, London, England
[5] UCL Inst Ophthalmol, London, England
[6] Ulverscroft Vis Res Grp, London, England
来源
PLOS ONE | 2020年 / 15卷 / 12期
关键词
FUNCTIONAL VISION; VISUAL IMPAIRMENT; MEASURES PROMS; YOUNG-PEOPLE; HEALTH-CARE; CHILDREN; FEEDBACK; IMPACT; TIME;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0243563
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background/Objectives Routine use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to assess quality of health care systems is mandated in many countries and has been implemented successfully in many specialities. Ophthalmology currently lags behind. To support and inform future implementation, we investigated paediatric ophthalmic clinicians' experience of, and future training needs for, using child-appropriate vision PROMs and their views about the barriers and enablers to future routine implementation in clinical practice. Methods We conducted a pilot study, using an online survey to elicit the experience, attitudes, training needs and perceptions of barriers and enablers to routine PROMs use of ophthalmic health professionals in the Paediatric Ophthalmology Department at Great Ormond Street Hospital, London. A focus-group was undertaken to discuss survey results and preferences regarding presentation of PROM data. Analysis comprised descriptive statistics, presented alongside complementary qualitative data. Results Eighteen clinicians in the department completed the survey. Twenty-seven took part in the focus group. Clinicians had limited experience of using PROMs but high confidence in the potential positive impact on communication with patients, monitoring chronic conditions and clinical decision-making. Clinicians identified operational issues (collection and analysis of data) and impact (interpretation and application of data) as the two key areas for consideration. Training and information requirements before implementation were clearly articulated, alongside the benefits of using digital/electronic data capture ahead of consultations to allow efficiency and automated analysis, and presentation in an appropriate visual format alongside clinical data to ensure meaningful use. Conclusion The findings of this pilot study of ophthalmic clinicians working in a specialist paediatric ophthalmology department, suggest that ophthalmic clinicians recognise the potential benefits of routine PROMs use in clinical practice. Together with existing literature outside ophthalmology relating to overcoming barriers and exploiting enablers to routine implementation, findings may be applicable in planning routine PROM implementation in paediatric ophthalmology.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Added Value of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Stroke Clinical Practice
    Katzan, Irene L.
    Thompson, Nicolas R.
    Lapin, Brittany
    Uchino, Ken
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION, 2017, 6 (07):
  • [32] Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Clinical Research
    Weinfurt, Kevin P.
    Reeve, Bryce B.
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2022, 328 (05): : 472 - 473
  • [33] Visualization formats of patient-reported outcome measures in clinical practice: a systematic review about preferences and interpretation accuracy
    Elaine A. C. Albers
    Itske Fraterman
    Iris Walraven
    Erica Wilthagen
    Sanne B. Schagen
    Iris M. van der Ploeg
    Michel W. J. M. Wouters
    Lonneke V. van de Poll-Franse
    Kelly M. de Ligt
    Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, 6
  • [34] Visualization formats of patient-reported outcome measures in clinical practice: a systematic review about preferences and interpretation accuracy
    Albers, Elaine A. C.
    Fraterman, Itske
    Walraven, Iris
    Wilthagen, Erica
    Schagen, Sanne B.
    van der Ploeg, Iris M.
    Wouters, Michel W. J. M.
    van de Poll-franse, Lonneke V.
    de Ligt, Kelly M.
    JOURNAL OF PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES, 2022, 6 (01)
  • [35] Patient Satisfaction with Collection of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Routine Care
    Pablo F. Recinos
    Cheryl J. Dunphy
    Nicolas Thompson
    Jesse Schuschu
    John L. Urchek
    Irene L. Katzan
    Advances in Therapy, 2017, 34 : 452 - 465
  • [36] Patient Satisfaction with Collection of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Routine Care
    Recinos, Pablo F.
    Dunphy, Cheryl J.
    Thompson, Nicolas
    Schuschu, Jesse
    Urchek, John L., III
    Katzan, Irene L.
    ADVANCES IN THERAPY, 2017, 34 (02) : 452 - 465
  • [37] The Usefulness of Patient-Reported Measures for Clinical Practice
    Van Vliet, Michael M.
    Maradey, Johann A.
    Homa, Karen A.
    Kerrigan, Carolyn L.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2013, 132 (01) : 105 - 112
  • [38] Patient-reported outcome measures for lung cancer in daily clinical use
    Davies, G.
    Collier, G.
    Whatling, K.
    LUNG CANCER, 2019, 127 : S67 - S67
  • [39] Patient-reported outcome measures for use in clinical trials of SLE: a review
    Izadi, Zara
    Gandrup, Julie
    Katz, Patricia P.
    Yazdany, Jinoos
    LUPUS SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2018, 5 (01):
  • [40] Patient experience with patient-reported outcome measures in neurologic practice
    Lapin, Brittany
    Udeh, Belinda
    Bautista, Jocelyn F.
    Katzan, Irene L.
    NEUROLOGY, 2018, 91 (12) : E1135 - E1151