Attitudes, experiences, and preferences of ophthalmic professionals regarding routine use of patient-reported outcome measures in clinical practice

被引:7
|
作者
Robertson, Alexandra O. [1 ]
Tadic, Valerija [1 ,2 ]
Rahi, Jugnoo S. [1 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] UCL Great Ormond St GOS Inst Child Hlth, Populat Policy & Practice Res & Teaching Dept, London, England
[2] Univ Greenwich, Sch Human Sci, London, England
[3] Great Ormond St Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, London, England
[4] Moorfields Eye Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Biomed Res Ctr, Natl Inst Hlth Res NIHR, London, England
[5] UCL Inst Ophthalmol, London, England
[6] Ulverscroft Vis Res Grp, London, England
来源
PLOS ONE | 2020年 / 15卷 / 12期
关键词
FUNCTIONAL VISION; VISUAL IMPAIRMENT; MEASURES PROMS; YOUNG-PEOPLE; HEALTH-CARE; CHILDREN; FEEDBACK; IMPACT; TIME;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0243563
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background/Objectives Routine use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to assess quality of health care systems is mandated in many countries and has been implemented successfully in many specialities. Ophthalmology currently lags behind. To support and inform future implementation, we investigated paediatric ophthalmic clinicians' experience of, and future training needs for, using child-appropriate vision PROMs and their views about the barriers and enablers to future routine implementation in clinical practice. Methods We conducted a pilot study, using an online survey to elicit the experience, attitudes, training needs and perceptions of barriers and enablers to routine PROMs use of ophthalmic health professionals in the Paediatric Ophthalmology Department at Great Ormond Street Hospital, London. A focus-group was undertaken to discuss survey results and preferences regarding presentation of PROM data. Analysis comprised descriptive statistics, presented alongside complementary qualitative data. Results Eighteen clinicians in the department completed the survey. Twenty-seven took part in the focus group. Clinicians had limited experience of using PROMs but high confidence in the potential positive impact on communication with patients, monitoring chronic conditions and clinical decision-making. Clinicians identified operational issues (collection and analysis of data) and impact (interpretation and application of data) as the two key areas for consideration. Training and information requirements before implementation were clearly articulated, alongside the benefits of using digital/electronic data capture ahead of consultations to allow efficiency and automated analysis, and presentation in an appropriate visual format alongside clinical data to ensure meaningful use. Conclusion The findings of this pilot study of ophthalmic clinicians working in a specialist paediatric ophthalmology department, suggest that ophthalmic clinicians recognise the potential benefits of routine PROMs use in clinical practice. Together with existing literature outside ophthalmology relating to overcoming barriers and exploiting enablers to routine implementation, findings may be applicable in planning routine PROM implementation in paediatric ophthalmology.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Myotonic dystrophy patient preferences in patient-reported outcome measures
    Heatwole, Chad
    Johnson, Nicholas
    Dekdebrun, Jeanne
    Dilek, Nuran
    Eichinger, Kate
    Hilbert, James
    Luebbe, Elizabeth
    Martens, William
    Mcdermott, Michael P.
    Thornton, Charles
    Moxley, Richard
    MUSCLE & NERVE, 2018, 58 (01) : 49 - 55
  • [22] Preferences of Individuals With Cancer for Patient-Reported Outcome Measures
    Whisenant, Meagan S.
    Bamidele, Oluwatosin
    Cleeland, Charles
    Williams, Loretta A.
    ONCOLOGY NURSING FORUM, 2021, 48 (02) : 173 - 183
  • [23] The use of patient reported outcome measures in routine clinical practice: lack of impact or lack of theory?
    Greenhalgh, J
    Long, AF
    Flynn, R
    SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2005, 60 (04) : 833 - 843
  • [24] Knowledge, use and attitudes of healthcare professionals towards patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) at a comprehensive cancer center
    Brunelli, Cinzia
    Zito, Emanuela
    Alfieri, Sara
    Borreani, Claudia
    Roli, Anna
    Caraceni, Augusto
    Apolone, Giovanni
    BMC CANCER, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [25] Knowledge, use and attitudes of healthcare professionals towards patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) at a comprehensive cancer center
    Brunelli, Cinzia
    Zito, Emanuela
    Alfieri, Sara
    Borreani, Claudia
    Caraceni, Augusto
    Roli, Anna
    Apolone, Giovanni
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2021, 30 (SUPPL 1) : S170 - S171
  • [26] Knowledge, use and attitudes of healthcare professionals towards patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) at a comprehensive cancer center
    Cinzia Brunelli
    Emanuela Zito
    Sara Alfieri
    Claudia Borreani
    Anna Roli
    Augusto Caraceni
    Giovanni Apolone
    BMC Cancer, 22
  • [27] Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Routine Clinical Care: The PROMise of a Better Future?
    Hutchings, Hayley A.
    Alrubaiy, Laith
    DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 2017, 62 (08) : 1841 - 1843
  • [28] Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Routine Clinical Care: The PROMise of a Better Future?
    Hayley A. Hutchings
    Laith Alrubaiy
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 2017, 62 : 1841 - 1843
  • [29] Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Routine Pediatric Clinical Care: A Systematic Review
    Bele, Sumedh
    Chugh, Ashton
    Mohamed, Bijan
    Teela, Lorynn
    Haverman, Lotte
    Santana, Maria J.
    FRONTIERS IN PEDIATRICS, 2020, 8
  • [30] Surgeon Perceptions of the Integration of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures into Clinical Practice
    Driscoll, Brittni
    Leonard, Laura D.
    Kovar, Alexandra
    Billings, Joshua
    Tevis, Sarah E.
    Kim, Simon P.
    Cumbler, Ethan
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2022, 280 : 486 - 494