Clinically relevant cancer biomarkers and pharmacogenetic assays

被引:6
|
作者
Patel, Jai N.
Mandock, Katherine
McLeod, Howard L.
机构
[1] Division of Pharmacotherapy and Experimental Therapeutics, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill, NC
[2] UNC Institute for Pharmacogenomics and Individualized Therapy, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill, NC
[3] Smilow Cancer Center, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT
关键词
Pharmacogenetic; cancer; biomarker; clinical; assay; IN-SITU HYBRIDIZATION; BREAST-CANCER; PHILADELPHIA-CHROMOSOME; LUNG-CANCER; MUTATIONS; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; IMPLEMENTATION; POLYMORPHISM; GENOTYPE; TPMT;
D O I
10.1177/1078155212473862
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BackgroundThe number of pharmacogenetic assays available is continuously expanding as more molecularly targeted anticancer drugs are under clinical development. While the literature regarding drug-gene associations and therapeutic implications is often robust, reviews regarding clinical assay availability and profiling methodologies of commonly used cancer biomarkers are often lacking. ObjectiveTo concisely identify and describe cancer biomarkers and their respective pharmacogenetic assays currently available in clinical practice. DiscussionAnalysis of germ-line DNA mutations can often help to predict pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic responses, whereas somatic DNA mutations are particularly useful in predicting tumor response. Molecular profiling and pre-emptive identification of cancer biomarkers can help to predict disease prognosis as well as response to anticancer therapy. Dozens of pharmacogenetic assays, utilizing several common methodologies, are currently available in clinical practice. It is essential for clinicians to understand the molecular pathways for anticancer drugs, the therapeutic implications of mutations within these pathways, the clinical assay(s) available to test for pharmacogenetic differences, and the common profiling methodology employed. ConclusionAs research continues to unveil more drug-gene and disease-gene associations, it is critical that clinicians understand which pharmacogenetic assays are available to identify inter-individual differences that predict safety and efficacy of anticancer drugs as we move toward the concept of personalized medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:65 / 72
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Discovery of clinically relevant fusions in pediatric cancer
    LaHaye, Stephanie
    Fitch, James R.
    Voytovich, Kyle J.
    Herman, Adam C.
    Kelly, Benjamin J.
    Lammi, Grant E.
    Arbesfeld, Jeremy A.
    Wijeratne, Saranga
    Franklin, Samuel J.
    Schieffer, Kathleen M.
    Bir, Natalie
    McGrath, Sean D.
    Miller, Anthony R.
    Wetzel, Amy
    Miller, Katherine E.
    Bedrosian, Tracy A.
    Leraas, Kristen
    Varga, Elizabeth A.
    Lee, Kristy
    Gupta, Ajay
    Setty, Bhuvana
    Boue, Daniel R.
    Leonard, Jeffrey R.
    Finlay, Jonathan L.
    Abdelbaki, Mohamed S.
    Osorio, Diana S.
    Koo, Selene C.
    Koboldt, Daniel C.
    Wagner, Alex H.
    Eisfeld, Ann-Kathrin
    Mrozek, Krzysztof
    Magrini, Vincent
    Cottrell, Catherine E.
    Mardis, Elaine R.
    Wilson, Richard K.
    White, Peter
    BMC GENOMICS, 2021, 22 (01)
  • [42] Clinically relevant mutational signatures in childhood cancer
    Shlien, Adam
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2020, 80 (14) : 25 - 26
  • [43] CLINICALLY RELEVANT GENE SEQUENCING IN LUNG CANCER
    Thompson, Patricia
    Dhillon, Navneet
    Bechara, Rabih
    Parks, Christopher
    Redmond, Terri
    Gershenhorn, Bruce
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2014, 9 (09) : S201 - S201
  • [44] Clinically relevant biology of hereditary breast cancer
    Foulkes, William D.
    SEMINARS IN ONCOLOGY, 2007, 34 (05) : 379 - 383
  • [45] Clinically Relevant Gene Sequencing in Lung Cancer
    Thompson, Patricia L.
    Redmond, Terri
    Parks, Christopher
    Bechara, Rabih
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2015, 10 (09) : S777 - S777
  • [46] Clinically Relevant Gene Sequencing in Lung Cancer
    Thompson, P.
    Bechara, R.
    Parks, C.
    Redmond, T.
    Dhillon, N.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2014, 90 : S50 - S50
  • [47] Tear Lactoferrin and Lysozyme as Clinically Relevant Biomarkers of Mucosal Immune Competence
    Hanstock, Helen G.
    Edwards, Jason P.
    Walsh, Neil P.
    FRONTIERS IN IMMUNOLOGY, 2019, 10
  • [48] Elecsys NT-ProBNP and BNP assays: Are there analytically and clinically relevant differences?
    Yeo, KTJ
    Dumont, KE
    Brough, T
    JOURNAL OF CARDIAC FAILURE, 2005, 11 (05) : S84 - S88
  • [49] Is the benefit of oxaliplatin in rectal cancer clinically relevant?
    Glimelius, Bengt
    LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2015, 16 (08): : 883 - 885
  • [50] Discovery of clinically relevant fusions in pediatric cancer
    Stephanie LaHaye
    James R. Fitch
    Kyle J. Voytovich
    Adam C. Herman
    Benjamin J. Kelly
    Grant E. Lammi
    Jeremy A. Arbesfeld
    Saranga Wijeratne
    Samuel J. Franklin
    Kathleen M. Schieffer
    Natalie Bir
    Sean D. McGrath
    Anthony R. Miller
    Amy Wetzel
    Katherine E. Miller
    Tracy A. Bedrosian
    Kristen Leraas
    Elizabeth A. Varga
    Kristy Lee
    Ajay Gupta
    Bhuvana Setty
    Daniel R. Boué
    Jeffrey R. Leonard
    Jonathan L. Finlay
    Mohamed S. Abdelbaki
    Diana S. Osorio
    Selene C. Koo
    Daniel C. Koboldt
    Alex H. Wagner
    Ann-Kathrin Eisfeld
    Krzysztof Mrózek
    Vincent Magrini
    Catherine E. Cottrell
    Elaine R. Mardis
    Richard K. Wilson
    Peter White
    BMC Genomics, 22