Clinically relevant cancer biomarkers and pharmacogenetic assays

被引:6
|
作者
Patel, Jai N.
Mandock, Katherine
McLeod, Howard L.
机构
[1] Division of Pharmacotherapy and Experimental Therapeutics, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill, NC
[2] UNC Institute for Pharmacogenomics and Individualized Therapy, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill, NC
[3] Smilow Cancer Center, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT
关键词
Pharmacogenetic; cancer; biomarker; clinical; assay; IN-SITU HYBRIDIZATION; BREAST-CANCER; PHILADELPHIA-CHROMOSOME; LUNG-CANCER; MUTATIONS; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; IMPLEMENTATION; POLYMORPHISM; GENOTYPE; TPMT;
D O I
10.1177/1078155212473862
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BackgroundThe number of pharmacogenetic assays available is continuously expanding as more molecularly targeted anticancer drugs are under clinical development. While the literature regarding drug-gene associations and therapeutic implications is often robust, reviews regarding clinical assay availability and profiling methodologies of commonly used cancer biomarkers are often lacking. ObjectiveTo concisely identify and describe cancer biomarkers and their respective pharmacogenetic assays currently available in clinical practice. DiscussionAnalysis of germ-line DNA mutations can often help to predict pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic responses, whereas somatic DNA mutations are particularly useful in predicting tumor response. Molecular profiling and pre-emptive identification of cancer biomarkers can help to predict disease prognosis as well as response to anticancer therapy. Dozens of pharmacogenetic assays, utilizing several common methodologies, are currently available in clinical practice. It is essential for clinicians to understand the molecular pathways for anticancer drugs, the therapeutic implications of mutations within these pathways, the clinical assay(s) available to test for pharmacogenetic differences, and the common profiling methodology employed. ConclusionAs research continues to unveil more drug-gene and disease-gene associations, it is critical that clinicians understand which pharmacogenetic assays are available to identify inter-individual differences that predict safety and efficacy of anticancer drugs as we move toward the concept of personalized medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:65 / 72
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Ewing Sarcoma: A Tough Road to Clinically Relevant Biomarkers
    Shukla, Neerav
    PEDIATRIC BLOOD & CANCER, 2015, 62 (05) : 741 - 742
  • [22] Identification of clinically relevant biomarkers of epileptogenesis — a strategic roadmap
    Michele Simonato
    Denes V. Agoston
    Amy Brooks-Kayal
    Chris Dulla
    Brandy Fureman
    David C. Henshall
    Asla Pitkänen
    William H. Theodore
    Roy E. Twyman
    Firas H. Kobeissy
    Kevin K. Wang
    Vicky Whittemore
    Karen S. Wilcox
    Nature Reviews Neurology, 2021, 17 : 231 - 242
  • [23] Identification of clinically relevant biomarkers of epileptogenesis - a strategic roadmap
    Simonato, Michele
    Agoston, Denes V.
    Brooks-Kayal, Amy
    Dulla, Chris
    Fureman, Brandy
    Henshall, David C.
    Pitkanen, Asla
    Theodore, William H.
    Twyman, Roy E.
    Kobeissy, Firas H.
    Wang, Kevin K.
    Whittemore, Vicky
    Wilcox, Karen S.
    NATURE REVIEWS NEUROLOGY, 2021, 17 (04) : 231 - 242
  • [24] Clinically relevant discrepancies between different rheumatoid factor assays
    Falkenburg, Willem J. J.
    von Richthofen, Helen J.
    Koers, Jana
    Weykamp, Cas
    Schreurs, Marco W. J.
    Bakker-Jonges, Liesbeth E.
    Haagen, Inez-Anne
    Lems, Willem F.
    Hamann, Dorte
    van Schaardenburg, Dirkjan
    Rispens, Theo
    CLINICAL CHEMISTRY AND LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2018, 56 (10) : 1749 - 1758
  • [25] Clinically Relevant Biomarkers in Acute Heart Failure: An Update
    Mukherji, Agnibh
    Ansari, Uzair
    Borggrefe, Martin
    Akin, Ibrahim
    Behnes, Michael
    CURRENT PHARMACEUTICAL BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2017, 18 (06) : 482 - 490
  • [26] Development of a New Microtiter Plate Format for Clinically Relevant Assays
    Piletska, Elena V.
    Piletsky, Stanislav S.
    Whitcombe, Michael J.
    Chianella, Iva
    Piletsky, Sergey A.
    ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2012, 84 (04) : 2038 - 2043
  • [27] Communicating Clinically Relevant Information from NGS Oncology Assays
    Fernandes, H.
    Zia, H.
    Rennert, H.
    Kluk, M.
    JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS, 2016, 18 (06): : 1025 - 1026
  • [28] THE USE OF URINARY ENZYME ASSAYS TO OBTAIN CLINICALLY RELEVANT INFORMATION
    BONINI, PA
    FRANZINI, C
    ANNALES DE BIOLOGIE CLINIQUE, 1982, 40 (04) : 343 - 345
  • [29] Clinically relevant interpretation of solid phase assays for HLA antibody
    Bettinotti, Maria P.
    Zachary, Andrea A.
    Leffell, Mary S.
    CURRENT OPINION IN ORGAN TRANSPLANTATION, 2016, 21 (04) : 453 - 458
  • [30] CLINICALLY RELEVANT DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN DIFFERENT RHEUMATOID FACTOR ASSAYS
    Falkenburg, W.
    von Richthofen, H.
    Koers, J.
    Weykamp, C.
    Schreurs, M.
    Bakker-Jonges, L.
    Haagen, I. -A
    Lems, W.
    Hamann, D.
    van Schaardenburg, D.
    Rispens, T.
    ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2018, 77 : 1238 - 1238