Clinically relevant cancer biomarkers and pharmacogenetic assays

被引:6
|
作者
Patel, Jai N.
Mandock, Katherine
McLeod, Howard L.
机构
[1] Division of Pharmacotherapy and Experimental Therapeutics, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill, NC
[2] UNC Institute for Pharmacogenomics and Individualized Therapy, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill, NC
[3] Smilow Cancer Center, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT
关键词
Pharmacogenetic; cancer; biomarker; clinical; assay; IN-SITU HYBRIDIZATION; BREAST-CANCER; PHILADELPHIA-CHROMOSOME; LUNG-CANCER; MUTATIONS; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; IMPLEMENTATION; POLYMORPHISM; GENOTYPE; TPMT;
D O I
10.1177/1078155212473862
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BackgroundThe number of pharmacogenetic assays available is continuously expanding as more molecularly targeted anticancer drugs are under clinical development. While the literature regarding drug-gene associations and therapeutic implications is often robust, reviews regarding clinical assay availability and profiling methodologies of commonly used cancer biomarkers are often lacking. ObjectiveTo concisely identify and describe cancer biomarkers and their respective pharmacogenetic assays currently available in clinical practice. DiscussionAnalysis of germ-line DNA mutations can often help to predict pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic responses, whereas somatic DNA mutations are particularly useful in predicting tumor response. Molecular profiling and pre-emptive identification of cancer biomarkers can help to predict disease prognosis as well as response to anticancer therapy. Dozens of pharmacogenetic assays, utilizing several common methodologies, are currently available in clinical practice. It is essential for clinicians to understand the molecular pathways for anticancer drugs, the therapeutic implications of mutations within these pathways, the clinical assay(s) available to test for pharmacogenetic differences, and the common profiling methodology employed. ConclusionAs research continues to unveil more drug-gene and disease-gene associations, it is critical that clinicians understand which pharmacogenetic assays are available to identify inter-individual differences that predict safety and efficacy of anticancer drugs as we move toward the concept of personalized medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:65 / 72
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Economic Value of Pharmacogenetic Testing for Cancer Drugs with Clinically Relevant Drug-Gene Associations: A Systematic Literature Review
    Faruque, Fahim
    Noh, Heejung
    Hussain, Arif
    Neuberger, Edward
    Onukwugha, Eberechukwu
    JOURNAL OF MANAGED CARE & SPECIALTY PHARMACY, 2019, 25 (02): : 260 - 271
  • [32] Molecular diagnostics evaluation laboratories (MoDEL), a program to optimize assays for clinically useful cancer biomarkers
    Jessup, J.
    Jacobson, J.
    Lively, T.
    Lubensky, I.
    Segal, D.
    Taube, S.
    EJC SUPPLEMENTS, 2007, 5 (08): : 26 - 26
  • [33] Biomarkers of Phenethyl Isothiocyanate-Mediated Mammary Cancer Chemoprevention in a Clinically Relevant Mouse Model
    Singh, Shivendra V.
    Kim, Su-Hyeong
    Sehrawat, Anuradha
    Arlotti, Julie A.
    Hahm, Eun-Ryeong
    Sakao, Kozue
    Beumer, Jan H.
    Jankowitz, Rachel C.
    Chandra-Kuntal, Kumar
    Lee, Joomin
    Powolny, Anna A.
    Dhir, Rajiv
    JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2012, 104 (16): : 1228 - 1239
  • [34] Multiplexed proximity ligation assays to profile putative plasma biomarkers relevant to pancreatic and ovarian cancer
    Fredriksson, Simon
    Horecka, Joe
    Brustugun, Odd Terje
    Schlingemann, Joerg
    Koong, Albert C.
    Tibshirani, Rob
    Davis, Ronald W.
    CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 2008, 54 (03) : 582 - 589
  • [35] Clinically Relevant microRNAs in Ovarian Cancer
    Zhang, Shu
    Lu, Zhen
    Unruh, Anna K.
    Ivan, Cristina
    Baggerly, Keith A.
    Calin, George A.
    Li, Zongfang
    Bast, Robert C., Jr.
    Le, Xiao-Feng
    MOLECULAR CANCER RESEARCH, 2015, 13 (03) : 393 - 401
  • [36] The identification of clinically relevant biomarkers and therapeutic targets in cardiovascular disease
    Genero, M. H.
    Orti, E.
    Ojeda, E.
    Codevilla, M.
    Chiocconi, A.
    Scharlat, A.
    Cabanas, M. L.
    Lago, N.
    Lozano, G.
    Holzschuh, N.
    Zappacosta, S.
    Mirabelli, C.
    Lankina, T.
    Comesana, D.
    Ramos, F.
    DiLuise, S.
    Ramondino, R. F.
    Villalba, A. L.
    MOLECULAR & CELLULAR PROTEOMICS, 2004, 3 (10) : S9 - S9
  • [37] Clinically relevant differences between assays for von Willebrand factor activity
    Boender, J.
    Eikenboom, J.
    van der Bom, J. G.
    Meijer, K.
    de Meris, J.
    Fijnvandraat, K.
    Cnossen, M. H.
    Laros-van Gorkom, B. A. P.
    van Heerde, W. L.
    Mauser-Bunschoten, E. P.
    de Maat, M. P. M.
    Leebeek, F. W. G.
    JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS, 2018, 16 (12) : 2413 - 2424
  • [38] Identification of Clinically Relevant Brain Endothelial Cell Biomarkers in Plasma
    Cordon, Jenifer
    Duggan, Michael R.
    Gomez, Gabriela T.
    Pucha, Krishna A.
    Peng, Zhongsheng
    Dark, Heather E.
    Davatzikos, Christos
    Erus, Guray
    Lewis, Alexandria
    Moghekar, Abhay
    Candia, Julian
    Ferrucci, Luigi
    Kapogiannis, Dimitrios
    Walker, Keenan A.
    STROKE, 2023, 54 (11) : 2853 - 2863
  • [39] IDENTIFICATION OF CLINICALLY RELEVANT NEGATIVE CONTROLS FOR IN VITRO CYP INDUCTION ASSAYS
    Prentiss, Pilar
    Czerwinski, Maciej
    Neat, Jason N.
    Klaus, Bradley
    Tiller, Kali
    Buckley, David B.
    DRUG METABOLISM REVIEWS, 2012, 44 : 106 - 106
  • [40] Digital Biomarkers: Using Smartwatch Data For Clinically Relevant Outcomes
    Bhavsar, Karan
    Singhal, Shivam
    Chandel, Vivek
    Samal, Avijit
    Khandelwal, Sundeep
    Ahmed, Nasimuddin
    Ghose, Avik
    2021 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PERVASIVE COMPUTING AND COMMUNICATIONS WORKSHOPS AND OTHER AFFILIATED EVENTS (PERCOM WORKSHOPS), 2021, : 630 - 635