Discriminant Value of Custom Ocular Response Analyzer Waveform Derivatives in Keratoconus

被引:68
|
作者
Hallahan, Katie M. [1 ]
Roy, Abhijit Sinha [1 ]
Ambrosio, Renato, Jr. [2 ,3 ]
Salomao, Marcella [1 ,2 ]
Dupps, William J., Jr. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Cleveland Clin, Cole Eye Inst, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
[2] Inst Olhos, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
[3] Univ Sao Paulo, Dept Ophthalmol, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[4] Cleveland Clin, Lerner Res Inst, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
关键词
IN-SITU KERATOMILEUSIS; BIOMECHANICAL PROPERTIES; CORNEAL HYSTERESIS; PORCINE; ECTASIA; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.09.013
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate the performance of corneal hysteresis (CH), corneal resistance factor, and 16 investigator-derived Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA) variables in distinguishing keratoconus (KC) from the nondiseased state. Design: Retrospective case series. Participants: Fifty-four eyes of 27 unaffected patients and 49 eyes of 25 KC patients from the Instituto de Olhos, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Methods: Sixteen candidate variables were derived from exported ORA signals to characterize putative indicators of biomechanical behavior. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and the Z statistic were used to compare diagnostic performance. Main Outcome Measures: Discriminant value of standard and derived ORA variables as measured by AUC. Results: Fifteen of 16 candidate variables performed significantly better than chance (AUC, > 0.5) at discriminating KC. Diagnostic performance was greatest for a custom variable related to the depth of deformation as defined by the minimum applanation signal intensity during corneal deformation (concavity(min); mean AUC +/- standard error, 0.985 +/- 0.002) and a new measure incorporating the pressure-deformation relationship of the entire response cycle (hysteresis loop area, 0.967 +/- 0.002). Z statistics assessing the discriminative value of each of the top 5 variables demonstrated superiority to CH (AUC, 0.862 +/- 0.002). Concavity(min) had the best overall predictive accuracy (cutoff value, 50.37; 94.9% sensitivity, 91.7% specificity, and 93.2% test accuracy), and the top 4 variables demonstrated the most consistent relationships to KC severity. Conclusions: Investigator-derived ORA variables related to the depth of deformation and the pressuredeformation relationship demonstrated very high test accuracy for detecting the presence of KC. Beyond their diagnostic value, the candidate variables described in this report provide mechanistic insight into the nature of the ORA signal and the characteristic changes in corneal dynamics associated with KC. (C) 2014 by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.
引用
收藏
页码:459 / 468
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The Mechanical Interpretation of Ocular Response Analyzer Parameters
    Qin, Xiao
    Yu, Mengyao
    Zhang, Haixia
    Chen, Xinyan
    Li, Lin
    BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 2019
  • [32] A Clinical Description of Ocular Response Analyzer Measurements
    Lau, William
    Pye, David
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2011, 52 (06) : 2911 - 2916
  • [33] Ocular Response Analyzer in subjects with and without glaucoma
    Sullivan-Mee, Michael
    Billingsley, Shavon C.
    Patel, Amita D.
    Halverson, Kathy D.
    Alldredge, Brooks R.
    Qualls, Clifford
    OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 2008, 85 (06) : 463 - 470
  • [34] Changes in Ocular Response Analyzer Parameters After LASIK
    Chen, Shihao
    Chen, Ding
    Wang, Jianhua
    Lu, Fan
    Wang, Qinmei
    Qu, Jia
    JOURNAL OF REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2010, 26 (04) : 279 - 288
  • [35] Evaluation of the Intraocular Pressure Measured with the Ocular Response Analyzer
    Ogbuehi, Kelechi C.
    Almubrad, Turki M.
    CURRENT EYE RESEARCH, 2010, 35 (07) : 587 - 596
  • [36] Assessing Corneal Hysteresis Using the Ocular Response Analyzer
    McMonnies, Charles W.
    OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 2012, 89 (03) : E343 - E349
  • [37] Identification of Biomechanical Properties of the Cornea: The Ocular Response Analyzer
    Terai, Naim
    Raiskup, Frederik
    Haustein, Michael
    Pillunat, Lutz E.
    Spoerl, Eberhard
    CURRENT EYE RESEARCH, 2012, 37 (07) : 553 - 562
  • [38] The effects of Valsalva manoeuvre on Ocular Response Analyzer measurements
    Palamar, Melis
    Dag, Medine Yilmaz
    Yagci, Ayse
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPTOMETRY, 2015, 98 (05) : 447 - 450
  • [39] Assessment of the Ocular Response Analyzer as a Tool for Intraocular Pressure Measurement
    Elsheikh, Ahmed
    Alhasso, Daad
    Kotecha, Aachal
    Garway-Heath, David
    JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICAL ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2009, 131 (08):
  • [40] Evaluation of corneal biomechanical properties with the Reichert Ocular Response Analyzer
    Detry-Morel, Michele
    Jamart, Jacques
    Pourjavan, Saveh
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2011, 21 (02) : 138 - 148