Discriminant Value of Custom Ocular Response Analyzer Waveform Derivatives in Keratoconus

被引:68
|
作者
Hallahan, Katie M. [1 ]
Roy, Abhijit Sinha [1 ]
Ambrosio, Renato, Jr. [2 ,3 ]
Salomao, Marcella [1 ,2 ]
Dupps, William J., Jr. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Cleveland Clin, Cole Eye Inst, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
[2] Inst Olhos, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
[3] Univ Sao Paulo, Dept Ophthalmol, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[4] Cleveland Clin, Lerner Res Inst, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
关键词
IN-SITU KERATOMILEUSIS; BIOMECHANICAL PROPERTIES; CORNEAL HYSTERESIS; PORCINE; ECTASIA; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.09.013
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate the performance of corneal hysteresis (CH), corneal resistance factor, and 16 investigator-derived Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA) variables in distinguishing keratoconus (KC) from the nondiseased state. Design: Retrospective case series. Participants: Fifty-four eyes of 27 unaffected patients and 49 eyes of 25 KC patients from the Instituto de Olhos, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Methods: Sixteen candidate variables were derived from exported ORA signals to characterize putative indicators of biomechanical behavior. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and the Z statistic were used to compare diagnostic performance. Main Outcome Measures: Discriminant value of standard and derived ORA variables as measured by AUC. Results: Fifteen of 16 candidate variables performed significantly better than chance (AUC, > 0.5) at discriminating KC. Diagnostic performance was greatest for a custom variable related to the depth of deformation as defined by the minimum applanation signal intensity during corneal deformation (concavity(min); mean AUC +/- standard error, 0.985 +/- 0.002) and a new measure incorporating the pressure-deformation relationship of the entire response cycle (hysteresis loop area, 0.967 +/- 0.002). Z statistics assessing the discriminative value of each of the top 5 variables demonstrated superiority to CH (AUC, 0.862 +/- 0.002). Concavity(min) had the best overall predictive accuracy (cutoff value, 50.37; 94.9% sensitivity, 91.7% specificity, and 93.2% test accuracy), and the top 4 variables demonstrated the most consistent relationships to KC severity. Conclusions: Investigator-derived ORA variables related to the depth of deformation and the pressuredeformation relationship demonstrated very high test accuracy for detecting the presence of KC. Beyond their diagnostic value, the candidate variables described in this report provide mechanistic insight into the nature of the ORA signal and the characteristic changes in corneal dynamics associated with KC. (C) 2014 by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.
引用
收藏
页码:459 / 468
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Repeatability of Ocular Response Analyzer Waveform Parameters in Normal Eyes and Eyes After Refractive Surgery
    Landoulsi, Hana
    Saad, Alain
    Haddad, NourMaya N.
    Guilbert, Emmanuel
    Gatinel, Damien
    JOURNAL OF REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2013, 29 (10) : 708 - 716
  • [22] Improved Keratoconus Detection by Ocular Response Analyzer Testing After Consideration of Corneal Thickness as a Confounding Factor
    Gaston Galletti, Jeremias
    Pfoertner, Tomas
    Fuentes Bonthoux, Fernando
    JOURNAL OF REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2012, 28 (03) : 202 - U131
  • [23] Precision of Ocular Response Analyzer
    Goebels, Susanne Christiane
    Seitz, Berthold
    Langenbucher, Achim
    CURRENT EYE RESEARCH, 2012, 37 (08) : 689 - 693
  • [24] A Multicenter Study of Ocular Response Analyzer Custom Variables in Disqualified and Candidate Refractive Surgery Screening Patients
    De Stefano, Vinicius Silbiger
    Seven, Ibrahim
    Randleman, James Bradley
    Dupps, William J.
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2016, 57 (12)
  • [25] Comparison of the effect of eye rubbing in keratoconus and normal eyes using Scheimpflug analysis and Ocular Response Analyzer.
    Cerrate, Michelle
    Izquierdo, Luis
    Hadid, Marta G.
    Canola, Laura
    Maldonado, Carmen
    Chauca, Jose A.
    Henriquez, Maria
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2018, 59 (09)
  • [26] Ocular Response Analyzer Measurements in Keratoconus With Normal Central Corneal Thickness Compared With Matched Normal Control Eyes
    Fontes, Bruno M.
    Ambrosio, Renato, Jr.
    Velarde, Guillermo Coca
    Nose, Walton
    JOURNAL OF REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2011, 27 (03) : 209 - 215
  • [27] Inter-examiner Reproducibility of Ocular Response Analyzer Using the Waveform Score Quality Index in Healthy Subjects
    Mandalos, Achilleas
    Anastasopoulos, Eleftherios
    Makris, Leonidas
    Dervenis, Nikolaos
    Kilintzis, Vasilis
    Topouzis, Fotis
    JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2013, 22 (02) : 152 - 155
  • [28] Influence of Ocular Pulse Amplitude on Ocular Response Analyzer Measurements
    Xu, Guihua
    Lam, Dennis Shun
    Leung, Christopher Kai-shun
    JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2011, 20 (06) : 344 - 349
  • [29] Visualizing the dynamic change of Ocular Response Analyzer waveform using Variational Autoencoder in association with the peripapillary retinal arteries angle
    Asano, Shotaro
    Asaoka, Ryo
    Yamashita, Takehiro
    Aoki, Shuichiro
    Matsuura, Masato
    Fujino, Yuri
    Murata, Hiroshi
    Nakakura, Shunsuke
    Nakao, Yoshitaka
    Kiuchi, Yoshiaki
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2020, 10 (01)
  • [30] Visualizing the dynamic change of Ocular Response Analyzer waveform using Variational Autoencoder in association with the peripapillary retinal arteries angle
    Shotaro Asano
    Ryo Asaoka
    Takehiro Yamashita
    Shuichiro Aoki
    Masato Matsuura
    Yuri Fujino
    Hiroshi Murata
    Shunsuke Nakakura
    Yoshitaka Nakao
    Yoshiaki Kiuchi
    Scientific Reports, 10