Variability in Response to Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Motor Cortex

被引:589
|
作者
Wiethoff, Sarah [1 ]
Hamada, Masashi [1 ,2 ]
Rothwell, John C. [1 ]
机构
[1] UCL Inst Neurol, Sobell Dept Motor Neurosci & Movement Disorders, London WC1N 3BG, England
[2] Univ Tokyo, Dept Neurol, Grad Sch Med, Bunkyo Ku, Tokyo 1138655, Japan
关键词
Transcranial direct current stimulation; (TDCS); I-waves; Plasticity; Motor cortex; Facilitation; PAIRED ASSOCIATIVE STIMULATION; THETA-BURST STIMULATION; MAGNETIC STIMULATION; CORTICAL PLASTICITY; CORTICOSPINAL EXCITABILITY; ELECTRIC-FIELDS; SURFACE EMG; MODULATION; POLARIZATION; POTENTIALS;
D O I
10.1016/j.brs.2014.02.003
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Responses to a number of different plasticity-inducing brain stimulation protocols are highly variable. However there is little data available on the variability of response to transcranial direct current stimulation (TDCS). Objective: We tested the effects of TDCS over the motor cortex on corticospinal excitability. We also examined whether an individual's response could be predicted from measurements of onset latency of motor evoked potential (MEP) following stimulation with different orientations of monophasic transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Methods: Fifty-three healthy subjects participated in a crossover-design. Baseline latency measurements with different coil orientations and MEPs were recorded from the first dorsal interosseous muscle prior to the application of 10 min of 2 mA TDCS (0.057 mA/cm(2)). Thirty MEPs were measured every 5 min for up to half an hour after the intervention to assess after-effects on corticospinal excitability. Results: Anodal TDCS at 2 mA facilitated MEPs whereas there was no significant effect of 2 mA cathodal TDCS. A two-step cluster analysis suggested that approximately 50% individuals had only a minor, or no response to TDCS whereas the remainder had a facilitatory effect to both forms of stimulation. There was a significant correlation between the latency difference of MEPs (anterior-posterior stimulation minus latero-medial stimulation) and the response to anodal, but not cathodal TDCS. Conclusions: The large variability in response to these TDCS protocols is in line with similar studies using other forms of non-invasive brain stimulation. The effects highlight the need to develop more robust protocols, and understand the individual factors that determine responsiveness. (C) 2014 Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:468 / 475
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Motor cortex-induced plasticity by noninvasive brain stimulation: a comparison between transcranial direct current stimulation and transcranial magnetic stimulation
    Simis, Marcel
    Adeyemo, Bamidele O.
    Medeiros, Liciane F.
    Miraval, Forella
    Gagliardi, Rubens J.
    Fregni, Felipe
    NEUROREPORT, 2013, 24 (17) : 973 - 975
  • [42] Exploring the Differential Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: A Comparative Analysis of Motor Cortex and Cerebellar Stimulation
    Ul-ain, Qurat
    Ilyas, Saad
    Ali, Hamid
    Ali, Ijaz
    Ullah, Riaz
    Arshad, Hafsah
    Khalid, Sana
    Azim, Muhammad Ehab
    Liu, Tian
    Wang, Jue
    HELIYON, 2024, 10 (06)
  • [43] Effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on motor evoked potentials variability in humans
    Bashir, Shahid
    Ahmad, Shafiq
    Alatefi, Moath
    Hamza, Ali
    Sharaf, Mohamed
    Fecteau, Shirely
    Yoo, Woo Kyoung
    PHYSIOLOGICAL REPORTS, 2019, 7 (13):
  • [44] Transcranial magnetic and direct current stimulation of the visual cortex
    Antal, A
    Nitsche, MA
    Paulus, W
    TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION AND TRANSCRANIAL DIRECT CURRENT STIMULATION, 2003, 56 : 291 - +
  • [45] The contribution of interindividual factors to variability of response in transcranial direct current stimulation studies
    Li, Lucia M.
    Uehara, Kazumasa
    Hanakawa, Takashi
    FRONTIERS IN CELLULAR NEUROSCIENCE, 2015, 9
  • [46] Intra-individual variability in the response to anodal transcranial direct current stimulation
    Lopez-Alonso, Virginia
    Fernandez-del-Olmo, Miguel
    Costantini, Alessia
    Gonzalez-Henriquez, Juan Jose
    Cheeran, Binith
    CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2015, 126 (12) : 2342 - 2347
  • [47] Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Leg Motor Cortex Enhances Coordinated Motor Output During Walking With a Large Inter-Individual Variability
    van Asseldonk, Edwin H. F.
    Boonstra, Tjitske A.
    BRAIN STIMULATION, 2016, 9 (02) : 182 - 190
  • [48] Inter-individual variability in optimal current direction for transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex
    Balslev, Daniela
    Braet, Wouter
    McAllister, Craig
    Miall, R. Chris
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE METHODS, 2007, 162 (1-2) : 309 - 313
  • [49] BOLD fMRI response to direct stimulation (transcranial magnetic stimulation) of the motor cortex shows no decline with age
    McConnell, KA
    Bohning, DE
    Nahas, Z
    Shastri, A
    Teneback, C
    Lorberbaum, JP
    Lomarev, MP
    Vincent, DJ
    George, MS
    JOURNAL OF NEURAL TRANSMISSION, 2003, 110 (05) : 495 - 507
  • [50] BOLD fMRI response to direct stimulation (transcranial magnetic stimulation) of the motor cortex shows no decline with age
    K. A. McConnell
    D. E. Bohning
    Z. Nahas
    A. Shastri
    C. Teneback
    J. P. Lorberbaum
    M. P. Lomarev
    D. J. Vincent
    M. S. George
    Journal of Neural Transmission, 2003, 110 : 495 - 507