Variability in Response to Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Motor Cortex

被引:589
|
作者
Wiethoff, Sarah [1 ]
Hamada, Masashi [1 ,2 ]
Rothwell, John C. [1 ]
机构
[1] UCL Inst Neurol, Sobell Dept Motor Neurosci & Movement Disorders, London WC1N 3BG, England
[2] Univ Tokyo, Dept Neurol, Grad Sch Med, Bunkyo Ku, Tokyo 1138655, Japan
关键词
Transcranial direct current stimulation; (TDCS); I-waves; Plasticity; Motor cortex; Facilitation; PAIRED ASSOCIATIVE STIMULATION; THETA-BURST STIMULATION; MAGNETIC STIMULATION; CORTICAL PLASTICITY; CORTICOSPINAL EXCITABILITY; ELECTRIC-FIELDS; SURFACE EMG; MODULATION; POLARIZATION; POTENTIALS;
D O I
10.1016/j.brs.2014.02.003
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Responses to a number of different plasticity-inducing brain stimulation protocols are highly variable. However there is little data available on the variability of response to transcranial direct current stimulation (TDCS). Objective: We tested the effects of TDCS over the motor cortex on corticospinal excitability. We also examined whether an individual's response could be predicted from measurements of onset latency of motor evoked potential (MEP) following stimulation with different orientations of monophasic transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Methods: Fifty-three healthy subjects participated in a crossover-design. Baseline latency measurements with different coil orientations and MEPs were recorded from the first dorsal interosseous muscle prior to the application of 10 min of 2 mA TDCS (0.057 mA/cm(2)). Thirty MEPs were measured every 5 min for up to half an hour after the intervention to assess after-effects on corticospinal excitability. Results: Anodal TDCS at 2 mA facilitated MEPs whereas there was no significant effect of 2 mA cathodal TDCS. A two-step cluster analysis suggested that approximately 50% individuals had only a minor, or no response to TDCS whereas the remainder had a facilitatory effect to both forms of stimulation. There was a significant correlation between the latency difference of MEPs (anterior-posterior stimulation minus latero-medial stimulation) and the response to anodal, but not cathodal TDCS. Conclusions: The large variability in response to these TDCS protocols is in line with similar studies using other forms of non-invasive brain stimulation. The effects highlight the need to develop more robust protocols, and understand the individual factors that determine responsiveness. (C) 2014 Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:468 / 475
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Response Variability in Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: Why Sex Matters
    Rudroff, Thorsten
    Workman, Craig D.
    Fietsam, Alexandra C.
    Kamholz, John
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHIATRY, 2020, 11
  • [22] Bidirectional variability in motor cortex excitability modulation following 1 mA transcranial direct current stimulation in healthy participants
    Strube, Wolfgang
    Bunse, Tilmann
    Nitsche, Michael A.
    Nikolaeva, Alexandra
    Palm, Ulrich
    Padberg, Frank
    Falkai, Peter
    Hasan, Alkomiet
    PHYSIOLOGICAL REPORTS, 2016, 4 (15):
  • [23] Combining transcranial direct current stimulation with "bursty" repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the primary motor cortex: an electrophysiological study
    Hanganu, A.
    Siems, C.
    Groppa, S. A.
    Groppa, S.
    Siebner, H.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2009, 16 : 422 - 422
  • [24] Motor cortex abnormalities in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis with transcranial direct-current stimulation
    Quartarone, Angelo
    Lang, Nicolas
    Rizzo, Vincenzo
    Bagnato, Sergio
    Morgante, Francesca
    Sant'Angelo, Antonino
    Crupi, Domenica
    Battaglia, Fortunato
    Messina, Corrado
    Girlanda, Paolo
    MUSCLE & NERVE, 2007, 35 (05) : 620 - 624
  • [25] Comparison of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Electrode Montages for the Lower Limb Motor Cortex
    Patel, Radhika
    Madhavan, Sangeetha
    BRAIN SCIENCES, 2019, 9 (08)
  • [26] Electrophysiological Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Neural Activity in the Rat Motor Cortex
    Tanaka, Tomoko
    Isomura, Yoshikazu
    Kobayashi, Kazuto
    Hanakawa, Takashi
    Tanaka, Satoshi
    Honda, Manabu
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE, 2020, 14
  • [27] Expanding the parameter space of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of the primary motor cortex
    Agboada, Desmond
    Samani, Mohsen Mosayebi
    Jamil, Asif
    Kuo, Min-Fang
    Nitsche, Michael A.
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2019, 9 (1)
  • [28] Dural transcranial direct current stimulation over primary motor cortex during fMRI
    Joa, K. L.
    Min, J. H.
    Kim, W. H.
    Shin, Y. I.
    CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES, 2013, 35 : 417 - 417
  • [29] The effect of transcranial direct current stimulation of the motor cortex on exercise-induced pain
    Luca Angius
    James G. Hopker
    Samuele M. Marcora
    Alexis R. Mauger
    European Journal of Applied Physiology, 2015, 115 : 2311 - 2319
  • [30] Expanding the parameter space of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of the primary motor cortex
    Desmond Agboada
    Mohsen Mosayebi Samani
    Asif Jamil
    Min-Fang Kuo
    Michael A. Nitsche
    Scientific Reports, 9