Variability in Response to Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Motor Cortex

被引:589
|
作者
Wiethoff, Sarah [1 ]
Hamada, Masashi [1 ,2 ]
Rothwell, John C. [1 ]
机构
[1] UCL Inst Neurol, Sobell Dept Motor Neurosci & Movement Disorders, London WC1N 3BG, England
[2] Univ Tokyo, Dept Neurol, Grad Sch Med, Bunkyo Ku, Tokyo 1138655, Japan
关键词
Transcranial direct current stimulation; (TDCS); I-waves; Plasticity; Motor cortex; Facilitation; PAIRED ASSOCIATIVE STIMULATION; THETA-BURST STIMULATION; MAGNETIC STIMULATION; CORTICAL PLASTICITY; CORTICOSPINAL EXCITABILITY; ELECTRIC-FIELDS; SURFACE EMG; MODULATION; POLARIZATION; POTENTIALS;
D O I
10.1016/j.brs.2014.02.003
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Responses to a number of different plasticity-inducing brain stimulation protocols are highly variable. However there is little data available on the variability of response to transcranial direct current stimulation (TDCS). Objective: We tested the effects of TDCS over the motor cortex on corticospinal excitability. We also examined whether an individual's response could be predicted from measurements of onset latency of motor evoked potential (MEP) following stimulation with different orientations of monophasic transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Methods: Fifty-three healthy subjects participated in a crossover-design. Baseline latency measurements with different coil orientations and MEPs were recorded from the first dorsal interosseous muscle prior to the application of 10 min of 2 mA TDCS (0.057 mA/cm(2)). Thirty MEPs were measured every 5 min for up to half an hour after the intervention to assess after-effects on corticospinal excitability. Results: Anodal TDCS at 2 mA facilitated MEPs whereas there was no significant effect of 2 mA cathodal TDCS. A two-step cluster analysis suggested that approximately 50% individuals had only a minor, or no response to TDCS whereas the remainder had a facilitatory effect to both forms of stimulation. There was a significant correlation between the latency difference of MEPs (anterior-posterior stimulation minus latero-medial stimulation) and the response to anodal, but not cathodal TDCS. Conclusions: The large variability in response to these TDCS protocols is in line with similar studies using other forms of non-invasive brain stimulation. The effects highlight the need to develop more robust protocols, and understand the individual factors that determine responsiveness. (C) 2014 Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:468 / 475
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The effect of the anodal transcranial direct current stimulation over the cerebellum on the motor cortex excitability
    Ates, Mehlika Panpalli
    Alaydin, Hahl Can
    Cengiz, Bulent
    BRAIN RESEARCH BULLETIN, 2018, 140 : 114 - 119
  • [32] How electrode montage affects transcranial direct current stimulation of the human motor cortex
    Salvador, Ricardo
    Wenger, Cornelia
    Nitsche, Michael A.
    Miranda, Pedro C.
    2015 37TH ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY (EMBC), 2015, : 6924 - 6927
  • [33] Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation
    Nitsche, MA
    Paulus, W
    JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 2000, 527 (03): : 633 - 639
  • [34] Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of Motor Cortex in Cerebral Palsy: A Study Protocol
    Carvalho Duarte, Natalia de Almeida
    Collange Grecco, Luanda Andre
    Lazzari, Roberta Delasta
    Pasini Neto, Hugo
    Galli, Manuela
    Oliveira, Claudia Santos
    PEDIATRIC PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2018, 30 (01) : 67 - 71
  • [35] Modulation of motor cortex plasticity by transcranial direct current stimulation in control and stroked mice
    Podda, M. V.
    Barbati, S. A.
    Cocco, S.
    Longo, V.
    Gironi, K.
    Mainardi, M.
    Grassi, C.
    CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES, 2017, 43
  • [36] The effect of transcranial direct current stimulation of the motor cortex on exercise-induced pain
    Angius, Luca
    Hopker, James G.
    Marcora, Samuele M.
    Mauger, Alexis R.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY, 2015, 115 (11) : 2311 - 2319
  • [37] Language training and anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of the motor cortex in chronic aphasia
    Floeel, A.
    Darkow, R.
    Meinzer, M.
    51ST ACADEMY OF APHASIA PROCEEDINGS, 2013, 94 : 243 - 244
  • [38] Modulation of intracortical inhibition and facilitation of motor cortex through transcranial direct current stimulation
    Ogata, Katsuya
    Yamasaki, Takao
    Tobimatsu, Shozo
    2007 IEEE/ICME INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPLEX MEDICAL ENGINEERING, VOLS 1-4, 2007, : 2000 - 2003
  • [39] Effect of cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation of the primary motor and sensory cortex on migraine
    Rahimi, Mohammad Dawood
    Fadardi, Javad Salehi
    Bigdeli, Imanolla
    Saeidi, Morteza
    Ghasemi, Mohammad Mahdi
    Nikkhah, Karim
    CEPHALALGIA, 2017, 37 : 39 - 39
  • [40] Facilitation of implicit motor learning by weak transcranial direct current stimulation of the primary motor cortex in the human
    Nitsche, MA
    Schauenburg, A
    Lang, N
    Liebetanz, D
    Exner, C
    Paulus, W
    Tergau, F
    JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2003, 15 (04) : 619 - 626