Variability in Response to Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Motor Cortex

被引:589
|
作者
Wiethoff, Sarah [1 ]
Hamada, Masashi [1 ,2 ]
Rothwell, John C. [1 ]
机构
[1] UCL Inst Neurol, Sobell Dept Motor Neurosci & Movement Disorders, London WC1N 3BG, England
[2] Univ Tokyo, Dept Neurol, Grad Sch Med, Bunkyo Ku, Tokyo 1138655, Japan
关键词
Transcranial direct current stimulation; (TDCS); I-waves; Plasticity; Motor cortex; Facilitation; PAIRED ASSOCIATIVE STIMULATION; THETA-BURST STIMULATION; MAGNETIC STIMULATION; CORTICAL PLASTICITY; CORTICOSPINAL EXCITABILITY; ELECTRIC-FIELDS; SURFACE EMG; MODULATION; POLARIZATION; POTENTIALS;
D O I
10.1016/j.brs.2014.02.003
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Responses to a number of different plasticity-inducing brain stimulation protocols are highly variable. However there is little data available on the variability of response to transcranial direct current stimulation (TDCS). Objective: We tested the effects of TDCS over the motor cortex on corticospinal excitability. We also examined whether an individual's response could be predicted from measurements of onset latency of motor evoked potential (MEP) following stimulation with different orientations of monophasic transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Methods: Fifty-three healthy subjects participated in a crossover-design. Baseline latency measurements with different coil orientations and MEPs were recorded from the first dorsal interosseous muscle prior to the application of 10 min of 2 mA TDCS (0.057 mA/cm(2)). Thirty MEPs were measured every 5 min for up to half an hour after the intervention to assess after-effects on corticospinal excitability. Results: Anodal TDCS at 2 mA facilitated MEPs whereas there was no significant effect of 2 mA cathodal TDCS. A two-step cluster analysis suggested that approximately 50% individuals had only a minor, or no response to TDCS whereas the remainder had a facilitatory effect to both forms of stimulation. There was a significant correlation between the latency difference of MEPs (anterior-posterior stimulation minus latero-medial stimulation) and the response to anodal, but not cathodal TDCS. Conclusions: The large variability in response to these TDCS protocols is in line with similar studies using other forms of non-invasive brain stimulation. The effects highlight the need to develop more robust protocols, and understand the individual factors that determine responsiveness. (C) 2014 Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:468 / 475
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Can genetic polymorphisms predict response variability to anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of the primary motor cortex?
    Pellegrini, Michael
    Zoghi, Maryam
    Jaberzadeh, Shapour
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2021, 53 (05) : 1569 - 1591
  • [2] Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on the excitability of the leg motor cortex
    Jeffery, Dean T.
    Norton, Jonathan A.
    Roy, Francois D.
    Gorassini, Monica A.
    EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2007, 182 (02) : 281 - 287
  • [3] Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on the excitability of the leg motor cortex
    Dean T. Jeffery
    Jonathan A. Norton
    Francois D. Roy
    Monica A. Gorassini
    Experimental Brain Research, 2007, 182 : 281 - 287
  • [4] Shaping the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation of the human motor cortex
    Nitsche, M. A.
    Doemkes, S.
    Karakose, T.
    Antal, A.
    Liebetanz, D.
    Lang, N.
    Tergau, F.
    Paulus, W.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2007, 97 (04) : 3109 - 3117
  • [5] Modulation of pharyngeal motor cortex by transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): A dose response study
    Jefferson, S. J.
    Mistry, S.
    Singh, S.
    Hamdy, S.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2007, 14 : 315 - 315
  • [6] Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of motor cortex enhances running performance
    Park, Seung-Bo
    Sung, Dong Jun
    Kim, Bokyung
    Kim, SoJung
    Han, Joung-Kyue
    PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (02):
  • [7] Dual transcranial direct current stimulation on primaary motor cortex by fMRI
    Joa, K. L.
    Min, J. H.
    Kim, W. H.
    Shin, Y. I.
    CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES, 2013, 35 : 413 - 414
  • [8] Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Motor Cortex in Healthy Volunteers
    E. T. Erdogan
    S. S. Saydam
    A. Kurt
    S. Karamursel
    Neurophysiology, 2018, 50 : 124 - 130
  • [9] Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Motor Cortex in Healthy Volunteers
    Erdogan, E. T.
    Saydam, S. S.
    Kurt, A.
    Karamursel, S.
    NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2018, 50 (02) : 124 - 130
  • [10] Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on cortex modulation by stimulation of the primary motor cortex and parietal cortex in humans
    Bashir, Shahid
    Aisha, Dowihi
    Hamza, Ali
    Al-Hussain, Fawaz
    Yoo, Woo-Kyoung
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2021, 131 (11) : 1107 - 1114