Effect of central corneal thickness on intraocular pressure and comparison of Topcon CT-80 non-contact tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry

被引:22
|
作者
Mansoori, Tarannum [1 ]
Balakrishna, Nagalla [2 ]
机构
[1] Anand Eye Inst, Dept Glaucoma, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, India
[2] Natl Inst Nutr, Dept Stat, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, India
关键词
central corneal thickness; Goldmann applanation tonometer; Topcon CT-80 NCT; PNEUMOTONOMETER; AGREEMENT;
D O I
10.1111/cxo.12620
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Background: To compare intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements obtained with the Topcon CT-80 non-contact tonometer (NCT) and Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT), in different ranges of IOP in normal and glaucoma subjects, and to assess the influence of central corneal thickness (CCT) on the IOP measurements in Asian Indian eyes. Methods: Four hundred and two eyes of 402 subjects (193 newly diagnosed primary open angle glaucoma [POAG] and 209 normal) were enrolled for this prospective study. For each eye, IOP was measured with GAT by a glaucoma specialist and NCT by a trained optometrist. The IOP values were compared among the tonometers in the three different IOP ranges (<= 12 mmHg, 13-20 mmHg and >= 21 mmHg) using Bland-Altman graphs. Correlation between GAT and NCT was assessed by Pearson correlation co-efficient. CCT was measured with ultrasound pachymetry and its correlation with GAT and NCT was analysed using linear regression analysis. Results: The mean paired difference of IOP between NCT and GAT was 1.556 +/- 2.69 mmHg (r = 0.26, p = 0.006) at IOP range of <= 12 mmHg, -1.665 +/- 2.6 mmHg (r = 0.51, p < 0.0001) in IOP range of 13-20 mmHg and -2.202 +/- 3.44 mmHg (r = 0.82, p < 0.0001) in the IOP range of >= 21 mmHg. Linear regression analysis showed a mean IOP variation of 0.27 mmHg per 10 m change in CCT for NCT (p < 0.0001) and IOP change of 0.19 mmHg per 10 mu m change in CCT for GAT (p = 0.01). Conclusion: In this study of normotensive and POAG subjects, the Topcon CT-80 NCT showed an overestimation of IOP at the lower range and underestimation of IOP in normal and higher ranges of IOP. Clinicians should keep in mind that CCT influences IOP measurement with both types of tonometer and that the IOP readings obtained with these tonometers are not interchangeable.
引用
收藏
页码:206 / 212
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Intraocular pressure according to different types of tonometry (non-contact and Goldmann applanation) in patients with different degrees of bilateral tearing
    Seol, Bo Ram
    Kang, Tae Gu
    Gu, Bonhyeok
    PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (09):
  • [42] Goldmann Applanation Tonometry and Dynamic Contour Tonometry are not Correlated With Central Corneal Thickness in Primary Open Angle Glaucoma
    Regev, Guy
    Harris, Alon
    Siesky, Brent
    Shoshani, Yochai
    Egan, Patrick
    Moss, Adam
    Zalish, Miriam
    WuDunn, Darrell
    Ehrlich, Rita
    JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2011, 20 (05) : 282 - 286
  • [43] Influence of central corneal thickness on measured intraocular pressure differentials: Nidek RKT-7700, Topcon CT-80 NCTs and Goldmann Tonometer
    Ogbuehi, Kelechi C.
    Mucke, Sven
    Osuagwu, Uchechukwu L.
    OPHTHALMIC AND PHYSIOLOGICAL OPTICS, 2012, 32 (06) : 547 - 555
  • [44] Effect of central corneal thickness on Goldmann applanation tonometry measures - a different result with different pachymeters
    Doughty, Michael J.
    Jonuscheit, Sven
    GRAEFES ARCHIVE FOR CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2007, 245 (11) : 1603 - 1610
  • [45] The effect of contact lens-induced corneal edema on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry
    Oh, Jong-Hyun
    Yoo, Chungkwon
    Kim, Yong Yeon
    Kim, Hyo-Myung
    Song, Jong-Suk
    GRAEFES ARCHIVE FOR CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2009, 247 (03) : 371 - 375
  • [46] The effect of contact lens-induced corneal edema on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry
    Jong-Hyun Oh
    Chungkwon Yoo
    Yong Yeon Kim
    Hyo-Myung Kim
    Jong-Suk Song
    Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, 2009, 247 : 371 - 375
  • [47] Effect of central corneal thickness on Goldmann applanation tonometry measures—a different result with different pachymeters
    Michael J. Doughty
    Sven Jonuscheit
    Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, 2007, 245 : 1603 - 1610
  • [48] IOP Measured by Dynamic Contour Tonometry Correlates With IOP Measured by Goldmann Applanation Tonometry and Non-contact Tonometry in Japanese Individuals
    Ito, Ken
    Tawara, Akihiko
    Kubota, Toshiaki
    Harada, Yukinori
    JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2012, 21 (01) : 35 - 40
  • [49] A comparison of intraocular pressure measurements with the XPERT noncontact tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometry
    Popovich, KS
    Shields, MB
    JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 1997, 6 (01) : 44 - 46
  • [50] Comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry for measuring intraocular pressure in normal tension glaucomatous eyes
    Wang, Jing Grace
    Latina, Mark A.
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2017, 58 (08)