Alveolar Ridge Split on Horizontal Bone Augmentation: A Systematic Review

被引:46
|
作者
Elnayef, Basel [1 ]
Monje, Alberto [2 ]
Lin, Guo-Hao [2 ]
Gargallo-Albiol, Jordi [1 ]
Chan, Hsun-Liang [1 ]
Wang, Hom-Lay [2 ]
Hernandez-Alfaro, Federico [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Int Catalunya, Dept Oral Surg & Implantol, Barcelona, Spain
[2] Univ Michigan, Dept Periodont & Oral Med, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
alveolar ridge augmentation; bone regeneration; dental implants; osteotomy; systematic review; treatment outcome; IMMEDIATE IMPLANT PLACEMENT; ANORGANIC BOVINE BONE; EXPANSION TECHNIQUE; TOOTH EXTRACTION; MANDIBULAR RIDGE; CREST TECHNIQUE; BLOCK GRAFTS; FOLLOW-UP; MAXILLARY; RECONSTRUCTION;
D O I
10.11607/jomi.4051
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: Many techniques have been proposed to overcome the limitations displayed by maxillary atrophy. The aim of this systematic review was to assess the predictability, dimensional changes, and associated factors to successfully perform the alveolar ridge split (ARS) technique of augmentation. Materials and Methods: An electronic and manual literature searches was conducted by two independent reviewers in several databases, including Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Cochrane Oral Health Group Trials Register, for articles written in English up to February 2014. A manual search was also performed to ensure a thorough screening process. Based on the PICO (problem, intervention, comparison, outcome) model, the chief question of this study was: Can patients with horizontal ridge deficiency be successfully treated with the ARS technique and implant therapy? Results: Overall, 17 articles met the inclusion criteria, and a subsequent meta-analysis was performed. A Cohen kappa interagreement rate of 0.82 was reached. The implant survival rate of the included studies was 97.0% (range, 94.4% to 100%) with the full-thickness flap (FTF) approach and 95.7% (range, 86.6% to 100%) with the partial-thickness flap (PTF) approach. The weighted mean (WM) of horizontal bone width gain was calculated for included studies using FTF for the ARS technique. Four studies that had data were included in the meta-analysis. The WM +/- standard deviation of bone width gain was 3.19 +/- 1.19 mm (range, 2.00 to 4.03 mm). For studies using PTF for ARS, only one study provided mean and standard deviation of horizontal bone width gain (4.13 +/- 3.13 mm); hence, meta-analysis could not be performed. Buccal wall fracture represented the most frequent postoperative complication, followed by postoperative ridge resorption. Conclusion: In selected scenarios, the ARS technique might represent a predictable approach as demonstrated by a high implant survival rate, adequate horizontal bone gain, and minimal intra-and postoperative complications. Further research is needed to determine the influence of the grafting materials inserted and flap tissue biotype, as well as the anatomical characteristics on final bone augmentation outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:596 / 606
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Clinical performance of alveolar ridge augmentation with xenogeneic bone block grafts versus autogenous bone block grafts. A systematic review
    Sanchez-Labrador, Luis
    Molinero-Mourelle, Pedro
    Perez-Gonzalez, Fabian
    Saez-Alcaide, Luis Miguel
    Brinkmann, Jorge Cortes-Breton
    Martinez, Juan Lopez-Quiles
    Martinez-Gonzalez, Jose Maria
    JOURNAL OF STOMATOLOGY ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2021, 122 (03) : 293 - 302
  • [32] Lateral Alveolar Ridge Augmentation with Autogenous Tooth Block Graft Compared with Autogenous Bone Block Graft: a Systematic Review
    Starch-Jensen, Thomas
    Vitenson, Julie
    Deluiz, Daniel
    Ostergaard, Kimie Bols
    Tinoco, Eduardo Muniz Barretto
    JOMR-JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL RESEARCH, 2022, 13 (01):
  • [33] Block Allograft for Reconstruction of Alveolar Bone Ridge in Implantology: A Systematic Review
    Araujo, Pryscyla P. T.
    Oliveira, Kerlison P.
    Montenegro, Sheyla C. L.
    Carreiro, Adriana F. P.
    Silva, Jose S. P.
    Germano, Adriano R.
    IMPLANT DENTISTRY, 2013, 22 (03) : 304 - 308
  • [34] Horizontal Alveolar Ridge Augmentation with Xenogenic Block Grafts Compared with Autogenous Bone Block Grafts for Implant-retained Rehabilitation: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Christensen, Jeppe Gronemann
    Gronlund, Gustav Pors
    Georgi, Signe Risom
    Jensen, Thomas Starch-
    Bruun, Niels Henrik
    Jensen, Simon Storgard
    JOMR-JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL RESEARCH, 2023, 14 (02):
  • [35] Clinical Outcomes of Alveolar Ridge Augmentation with In Situ Autogenous Block Bone: A Retrospective Review
    Yang, Zinan
    Liang, Qian
    Lu, Haibin
    Chu, Hongxing
    Gan, Zekun
    Rong, Mingdeng
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2021, 36 (05) : 1008 - 1015
  • [36] Alveolar Ridge and Maxillary Sinus Augmentation Using rhBMP-2: A Systematic Review
    de Freitas, Rubens Moreno
    Spin-Neto, Rubens
    Marcantonio Junior, Elcio
    Violin Dias Pereira, Luis Antonio
    Wikesjoe, Ulf M. E.
    Susin, Cristiano
    CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2015, 17 : E192 - E201
  • [37] Alveolar ridge augmentation with the Bone Into Bone technique: a histological and histomorphometric analysis
    Lopez, M. A.
    Passarelli, P. C.
    Rella, E.
    Netti, A.
    Lopez, A.
    Casale, M.
    D'Addona, A.
    JOURNAL OF OSSEOINTEGRATION, 2021, 13 (03) : 121 - 126
  • [38] Horizontal Ridge Augmentation in Conjunction with or Prior to Implant Placement in the Anterior Maxilla: A Systematic Review
    Kuchler, Ulrike
    von Arx, Thomas
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2014, 29 : 14 - 24
  • [39] A review of the association between osteoporosis and alveolar ridge augmentation
    Erdogan, Oezguer
    Shafer, David M.
    Taxel, Pamela
    Freilich, Martin A.
    ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTOLOGY, 2007, 104 (06): : 738 - 746
  • [40] Alveolar ridge augmentation for implant fixation: status review
    Zakhary, Ibrahim E.
    El-Mekkawi, Hatem A.
    Elsalanty, Mohammed E.
    ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY, 2012, 114 (05): : S179 - S189